Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Wed, 19 Oct 2005 05:05:49 GMT, Dave Heil
wrote: wrote: On Wed, 19 Oct 2005 04:45:07 GMT, Dave Heil wrote: wrote: Dave Heil wrote: wrote: KØHB wrote: "an Old friend" wrote I was trying to tlak the subject in general merely giving an example ??????????????????????? Hans appears incapable. Try your local frequency coordinating body, perhaps the repeater coordinating body for 6M, if that is your interest. Each state or locality is different. Not for 6m AM, SSB or CW it isn't. No? Every state and locality can be different. For 6m AM, SSB and CW? You're simply incorrect. more pronoucement from on High you make the assertion explain why Follow the url I posted for the ARRL band plans. Read them. We can discuss it when you're educated. I have nothing is stated that says CW SSB or AM are somehow not subject to adjustment or local (or repgional) varriation, indeed the ARRL would lack the power to say that your assertion you back it up don't be your normal lazy bum self and tell others to do your work for you do it One size does not fit all. Read your ARRL repeater guide. Notice all the caveats wrt band plans, coordination, and even spacing. Those are regional differences, not local ones. What does the repeater guide say about 6m AM operation? Do you know of any 6m AM repeaters anywhere? Do you know why there can't be? There is no reason that my house can't be chartreuse...but it isn't. Do you know of any 6m AM repeaters? Just one will get you off the hook. which matters how no reason a 6m Am repeater can be built. No reason it can be built? Did you mean "can't be built". Read my comments above. you understand the question so answer rather than evade, lazy bum I know Riley was going on about a 2m AM repeater at one point Great. There've been AM repeaters on 5m, 6m and 2m in the past. I know of none at the present. Were you and the boys in the club going to start a 6m AM repeater? which mean you knoew of them? which means your point was what? you are about as myopic as Stevie Dave K8MN _________________________________________ Usenet Zone Free Binaries Usenet Server More than 140,000 groups Unlimited download http://www.usenetzone.com to open account |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Wed, 19 Oct 2005 16:59:52 GMT, Dave Heil
wrote: wrote: On Wed, 19 Oct 2005 05:05:49 GMT, Dave Heil wrote: cut more pronoucement from on High you make the assertion explain why Follow the url I posted for the ARRL band plans. Read them. We can discuss it when you're educated. I have nothing is stated that says CW SSB or AM are somehow not subject to adjustment or local (or repgional) varriation, indeed the ARRL would lack the power to say that Don't tell me what it doesn't say, Mark. one asshole I'll say what I like two it says not a thing about CW SSB or AM being different than FM wrt to local varriation Tell me what it says. It doesn't say anything about ending world hunger, saving the whales or any number of things. Six meters frequently opens for regional QSOs and even worldwide QSOs. Tell me what negative consequences there might be for a national band plan if guys in Podunk, Iowa began implementing a local band plan. depends on what they did. Using AM say near the top of 6M as a local window to avoid DX is unlikely to harm anything esp if they stay off the repeater pairs your assertion you back it up What was my assertion, Mark? That you go to the ARRL band plan url and read it? "For 6m AM, SSB and CW? You're simply incorrect." you aserted it and then were too dumb to remeber what you said don't be your normal lazy bum self and tell others to do your work for you do it That is *precisely* what you repeatedly ask others to do for you. I do ask it which is not what I was talking about. I don't give people ORDERS. I don't tell what what to do, except to get of when they start giving orders You ask questions about a topic of which you know little. "which is how we find out things I think I read that in maual somewhere" (drfloyd 2010) You're provided information or are pointed to where the information can be found (which you haven't troubled yourself to find and study on your own). sometimes never done with much in the way manners something the ProCoders keep telling they have more of but moving along You begin disputing the information. as is my right esp when you present things as "facts" that clearly are not It is the question of the 5 MHz frequencies all over again. and you just can't stand anyone daring to dispute anything you say You don't use a spell checking program because you can't be bothered, so you continue to post gibberish and to tell readers that it is their problem. is someone holding a gun to head and MAKING you read. if call the Cops I make no one read anything of mine I do think however as the ProCoders them selves say that if they want to read they should expect to work at it, then they will value it more. It is like poetry you make it too easy and it means nothing. In my case I seek to reach those that "will ignore the shout but strain to hear the wishper" (a ST:NG quote a trill amabssdor anmed Odan) If you want to see a lazy guy, stare into a mirror. One size does not fit all. Read your ARRL repeater guide. Notice all the caveats wrt band plans, coordination, and even spacing. Those are regional differences, not local ones. What does the repeater guide say about 6m AM operation? Do you know of any 6m AM repeaters anywhere? Do you know why there can't be? There is no reason that my house can't be chartreuse...but it isn't. Do you know of any 6m AM repeaters? Just one will get you off the hook. which matters how no reason a 6m Am repeater can be built. No reason it can be built? Did you mean "can't be built". Read my comments above. you understand the question so answer rather than evade, lazy bum The lazy bum was the guy who wrote it incorrectly and posted it without correction. stil does bother with the issue always the attack SoP of the stpid and the Lazy I know Riley was going on about a 2m AM repeater at one point Great. There've been AM repeaters on 5m, 6m and 2m in the past. I know of none at the present. Were you and the boys in the club going to start a 6m AM repeater? which mean you knoew of them? which means your point was what? I "knoew" of them? I know a lot of things, Mark. My point was exactly what I asked you: Do you know of any 6m AM repeaters in existence in the United States of America? not at this time and still what was the point? you are about as myopic as Stevie I'm sure it seems that way to a lazy dyslexic. more bashing and not even original boring Davie Dave K8MN Dave K8MN an ture oppentant to invovation of any kind in Ham radio what is Ham luddites club number Davie? _________________________________________ Usenet Zone Free Binaries Usenet Server More than 140,000 groups Unlimited download http://www.usenetzone.com to open account |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() wrote Using AM say near the top of 6M as a local window to avoid DX is unlikely to harm anything esp if they stay off the repeater pairs IIRC there are some simplex frequencies scattered between 53.0 and the top of the band. Any of them ought to be OK to use regardless of mode, without any blessing from anyone. I suggested the lower segment because of the wide-open nature down there, without the possibility of being clobbered (or clobbering) nearby WBFM repeaters. Beep beep de Hans, K0HB |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() wrote: Dave Heil wrote: wrote: cut I know Riley was going on about a 2m AM repeater at one point Great. There've been AM repeaters on 5m, 6m and 2m in the past. I know of none at the present. Were you and the boys in the club going to start a 6m AM repeater? Dave K8MN I'm floored by this MMM coming out against a legacy mode. Wow and Hi! indeed and fixacting on the example rather than the issue Indeed the behavoir of the MMM is forcing me to reconsider wether there might not be serious negitive health in some sectors of the population induced by exposure to Mosre Coded CW but indeed a 6M Am repeater has been kicked around althought the desire is imply to use AM simplex mostly some where it general is not looked for so we locals can chat. I and others find I like AM simplex over FM simplex but when we try using using we sometimes get interfed with by DX |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
The Pool | Policy | |||
New ARRL Proposal | Policy | |||
The Pool | Policy | |||
Length of Coax Affecting Incident Power to Meter? | Antenna |