On Wed, 19 Oct 2005 04:52:41 GMT, Dave Heil
wrote:

wrote:
Dave Heil wrote:

an_old_friend wrote:

Dave Heil wrote:


KØHB wrote:


"an Old friend" wrote


I was trying to tlak the subject in general merely giving an example

???????????????????????

His local gang was tlaking to their new club official. None of them
knew anything about frequencies used for 6m AM operation.

not at all

I was trying to spark an On Topic discussion HERE about how folks
would go about local band planing

It is "band planning", Mark and it isn't done on a local basis.


It can be on vhf and above frequencies. You just need to open your
mind a little, a very little.

It can't be done locally if there is any chance of interfering with
other regional repeaters.

more pronucements from on high

the MM's have spoken
If you are coordinating to avoid putting your
local machine with one 50 or 75 miles away, you aren't dealing with
local band planning. You're dealing with regional band planning.

not according to the ARRL you are being pretty certain about the
meaning of words

the ARRL says local bandplaning is possible

Now, what do your comments have to do with 6m AM operation?

why does it have to?

the topic was local band planing as described in the ARRL repeater
guide as possible

It is
done on a national and regional basis. If we decided to implement a
local band plan for 2m here, the 2m users in Pittsburgh, Morgantown,
Parkersburg, Marietta and Columbus would be in a dither.


There is still room for local variation in a regional plan.

...not if there is any chance of interfering with other repeaters in
your region, there isn't.

You told us of

your lack of knowledge of where 6m AM activity might be found. A couple
of us told you. Now you'll undoubtedly string us along for a number of
posts as you did over the 60m "band".

Perhaps he and other associates have no 6M crystal for where the AM
activity might be found and wants a local variation.

Yeah, that not being able to buy a crystal would be a significant hurdle.

Sheesh.

Dave K8MN

_________________________________________
Usenet Zone Free Binaries Usenet Server
More than 140,000 groups
Unlimited download
http://www.usenetzone.com to open account

wrote:
On Wed, 19 Oct 2005 04:52:41 GMT, Dave Heil
wrote:


wrote:

Dave Heil wrote:


an_old_friend wrote:


Dave Heil wrote:



KØHB wrote:



"an Old friend" wrote



I was trying to tlak the subject in general merely giving an example

???????????????????????

His local gang was tlaking to their new club official. None of them
knew anything about frequencies used for 6m AM operation.

not at all

I was trying to spark an On Topic discussion HERE about how folks
would go about local band planing

It is "band planning", Mark and it isn't done on a local basis.


It can be on vhf and above frequencies. You just need to open your
mind a little, a very little.

It can't be done locally if there is any chance of interfering with
other regional repeaters.


more pronucements from on high

the MM's have spoken

Not "pronucements", Mark, but "pronouncements". With which of my
statements do you disagree?

If you are coordinating to avoid putting your
local machine with one 50 or 75 miles away, you aren't dealing with
local band planning. You're dealing with regional band planning.


not according to the ARRL you are being pretty certain about the
meaning of words

I understand that the concept might be alien to a guy who has trouble
with words. Yes, I'm generally pretty certain about the meaning of
words. That is a tool which has served me well.


the ARRL says local bandplaning is possible

Not "bandplaning", Mark, but "band planning". Quote the material. I
provided you a url to the ARRL band plans. Nothing is mentioned about
local band planning.

Now, what do your comments have to do with 6m AM operation?


why does it have to?

....because you brought it up.

the topic was local band planing as described in the ARRL repeater
guide as possible

"Band planning", Mark. Please provide some evidence that the ARRL
endorses local band plans. Feel free to demonstrate that you have any
knowledge at all of band planning anywhere, any time.

Dave K8MN

On Wed, 19 Oct 2005 16:48:03 GMT, Dave Heil
wrote:

wrote:
On Wed, 19 Oct 2005 04:52:41 GMT, Dave Heil
wrote:
cut

"Band planning", Mark. Please provide some evidence that the ARRL
endorses local band plans. Feel free to demonstrate that you have any
knowledge at all of band planning anywhere, any time.

please show you have any such knowledge

indeed please show us you know anything true at all

Dave K8MN

_________________________________________
Usenet Zone Free Binaries Usenet Server
More than 140,000 groups
Unlimited download
http://www.usenetzone.com to open account

On Wed, 19 Oct 2005 16:48:03 GMT, Dave Heil
wrote:

wrote:
On Wed, 19 Oct 2005 04:52:41 GMT, Dave Heil
wrote:


wrote:

Dave Heil wrote:


an_old_friend wrote:
cut
not at all

I was trying to spark an On Topic discussion HERE about how folks
would go about local band planing

It is "band planning", Mark and it isn't done on a local basis.


It can be on vhf and above frequencies. You just need to open your
mind a little, a very little.

It can't be done locally if there is any chance of interfering with
other regional repeaters.


more pronucements from on high

the MM's have spoken

Not "pronucements", Mark, but "pronouncements". With which of my
statements do you disagree?

all of them

you advance the notion that nothing can be if the is ANY chance of
interference.

That statement is a load of ****

nothing say anything like that


If you are coordinating to avoid putting your
local machine with one 50 or 75 miles away, you aren't dealing with
local band planning. You're dealing with regional band planning.


not according to the ARRL you are being pretty certain about the
meaning of words

I understand that the concept might be alien to a guy who has trouble
with words. Yes, I'm generally pretty certain about the meaning of
words. That is a tool which has served me well.

do publish the dictionary of the words you choose to make up new
meanings for

it might help

but then I forgot you can't be helpfull or constructive can you?



the ARRL says local bandplaning is possible

Not "bandplaning", Mark, but "band planning".

shve the distintion up your ass

Quote the material. I
provided you a url to the ARRL band plans. Nothing is mentioned about
local band planning.

I am quote the text PRINTED by the ARRL

but then when you see fit the ARRL lies


Now, what do your comments have to do with 6m AM operation?


why does it have to?

...because you brought it up.

no I did not

the subject was Bandplaning you myopicaly choose to focus on an
example to exclusion of all other examples or posiiblities

I know asking you to think is asking you to exceed your abilities, but
I never asked you in particular to jump.

now that you have you might try being constructive

or not of course as you choose

the topic was local band planing as described in the ARRL repeater
guide as possible

"Band planning", Mark. Please provide some evidence that the ARRL
endorses local band plans. Feel free to demonstrate that you have any
knowledge at all of band planning anywhere, any time.

Dave K8MN

_________________________________________
Usenet Zone Free Binaries Usenet Server
More than 140,000 groups
Unlimited download
http://www.usenetzone.com to open account