Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#11
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Alun L. Palmer" wrote in message ... "Usenet Central" wrote in link.net: [snip] It's only an even race if you count those who want to retain a code test for Extra only as being in the anti camp. I guarantee that the FCC will be able to think of no reason to retain it only for Extras. In your dreams, maybe. The same thing could be said about any topic that isn't rules, good operating practice, electrical safety or RF safety. A single license class and single test would suffice to easily cover those three areas. Afterall, whether or not the licensee knows how to detect or fix a problem does not let him get out of following the rules and being responsible for his operation. However, the FCC continues to follow the concept that people need motivation beyond just personal curiosity to pursue the "self training" part of the basis and purpose. Code is as logical a choice as any other topic. But I agree that the FCC will decide to drop code entirely if they choose to move forward. Dee D. Flint, N8UZE |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Docket Scorecard | Policy | |||
Docket 05-235 Scorecard | Policy | |||
Stonewalling on WT Docket 05-235? | Policy | |||
Stonewalling WT Docket 05-235? | Policy | |||
Status of WT Docket 05-235 | Policy |