![]() |
FAQ
huLLy wrote: The Magnum wrote: Hold about a bit matey boy... Just because someone uses a CB doesnt make them a lower class person or less intellectual than an Amateur radio user. They may have brains far exceeding yours on several topics, just not on radio. Just because you know a bit about radio doesnt make you a higher class of person... IT JUST MEANS YOU KNOW ABOUT RADIO'S..... now try learning common sense, respect for ones fellow man and remember.. Amateur Radio.. Just like CB.. is JUST A HOBBY... I love the bit though where you say "it is neither my wish to insult them" but you manage to do it anyhow... 10-4 over and out .. or in your case QRT.. Poly Parrot has forgotten he has owned a CB and a license (still does, I expect), ignore him.. having been arrested he is a prime example of what amateur radio has descended to. -- huLLy Mobile phone 07976 123278 ICQ 136-987-925 Does he get on there with a linear and talk to W4LLI, Billy Jack like he used to do on 75/80 meters? |
FAQ
Unbeknown to me, this thread had already been cross-posted to
the CB groups, and I would have removed that cross-posting had I been aware of it. In respect of that, I apologise if my remarks have caused any offence to the CB community. However, I do not withdraw my remarks - they are my opinion as to the relative standing of Radio Hams and of CB Radio enthusiasts where the playing-field is that of Radio Hams. However, having said that, the material quoted below serves, I think, to illustrate quite well the intellectual standing of CB Radio enthusiasts upon which I have commented..... wrote: you are one of the worst.....idiots..... little motherf*cker.....complete idiots like you.....F*cking idiot moron. |
FAQ
Especially for you.
|
FAQ
Frank Gilliland wrote:
Gee, why didn't you crosspost this to rrcb? Yeah, that was a waste of bandwidth, it is much too technical for cbers to comprehend. |
FAQ
Cmd Buzz Corey wrote: Frank Gilliland wrote: Gee, why didn't you crosspost this to rrcb? Yeah, that was a waste of bandwidth, it is much too technical for cbers to comprehend. Especially you. |
FAQ
|
FAQ
On Fri, 21 Oct 2005 19:11:52 +0100, "The Magnum"
wrote: Hold about a bit matey boy... Just because someone uses a CB doesnt make them a lower class person or less intellectual than an Amateur radio user. They may have brains far exceeding yours on several topics, just not on radio. Just because you know a bit about radio doesnt make you a higher class of person... IT JUST MEANS YOU KNOW ABOUT RADIO'S..... now try learning common sense, respect for ones fellow man and remember.. Amateur Radio.. Just like CB.. is JUST A HOBBY... I love the bit though where you say "it is neither my wish to insult them" but you manage to do it anyhow... 10-4 over and out .. or in your case QRT.. Another CB-er and potential F-class adherent. (You can spot them the minute they put finger to keyboard). -- 73 de Jock. "Choice has always been a privilege of those who could afford to pay for it." - Ellen Frankfort |
FAQ
Now stop this at once please Children! GROW UP
-- -- 73deG1LVN(M0WWS) it's back it's: http://qsy.to/ChorleyFM !! http://www.g1lvn.org.uk/wavefiles/ "Cmd Buzz Corey" wrote in message m... wrote: Cmd Buzz Corey wrote: Frank Gilliland wrote: Gee, why didn't you crosspost this to rrcb? Yeah, that was a waste of bandwidth, it is much too technical for cbers to comprehend. Especially you. Hey wogie, tell us all about that negative swr. LOLOLOLOLOLOLOL!!!! |
FAQ
|
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 08:36 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
RadioBanter.com