| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
|
|
#2
October 28th 05, 12:07 PM
|
|||
|
|||
Lennie's Scorecard Backfires
wrote: On 27 Oct 2005 20:14:29 -0700, wrote: wrote: On 27 Oct 2005 16:33:17 -0700, wrote: wrote: Iitoi wrote: I wonder if James cut 73 de Jim, N2EY Since someone else is also performing the tally, would you care to compare/contrast the tallies? obviously not he seem to prefer carping at Len Yep. He has no real interest in the issue since he's made up his mind that the FCC is against his precious Morse Code exam. His only purpose now is to try to discredit his primary antagonist before he departs RRAP for Coslo's exclusive BBS. amusing and sad how he and other go on Len's lack of license but are still vitaly concerned about what he may say Yep. They protest too loudly, drawing the attention to Len's words which might otherwise not attract so much attention. Have you seen the new thread where James points out Len being uncomfortable with children participating in what Len believes to be a primarily adult activity? Hi! |
|
#3
October 29th 05, 12:17 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Lennie's Scorecard Backfires
From: on Fri 28 Oct 2005 03:07
wrote: On 27 Oct 2005 20:14:29 -0700, wrote: wrote: On 27 Oct 2005 16:33:17 -0700, wrote: wrote: Iitoi wrote: Since someone else is also performing the tally, would you care to compare/contrast the tallies? obviously not he seem to prefer carping at Len Yep. He has no real interest in the issue since he's made up his mind that the FCC is against his precious Morse Code exam. His only purpose now is to try to discredit his primary antagonist before he departs RRAP for Coslo's exclusive BBS. amusing and sad how he and other go on Len's lack of license but are still vitaly concerned about what he may say Yep. They protest too loudly, drawing the attention to Len's words which might otherwise not attract so much attention. ...in one way that's good...in another, bad... :-) Have you seen the new thread where James points out Len being uncomfortable with children participating in what Len believes to be a primarily adult activity? Hi! Tsk, tsk, tsk...I think Jimmie-James is all for children VOTING in elections! Or perhaps, it is okay for children having state drivers' licenses...maybe it being okay for them to go into liquor stores to buy alcohol without age limit...or serving in armed forces of the United States (like Jimmie Noserve)...get married...piloting aircraft with legal license to do so in his age-limit-less world? James P. Miccolis has NOT answered a repeated question: How many children has HE parented? He won't say, doesn't answer. That's NOT the real subject of Jimmie-James' efforts. He is still ****ed at being confronted with opposite opinions in here by those who will not accept HIS opinions. He MUST re-argue and re-argue and re-argue old, Old, OLD issues from years back. Maybe he hopes to "win" an old argument that way? I don't think so. If the Muppets need a new character, I'd nominate him as "Miss ****y." :-) Meanwhile, Jimmie-James keeps up his "Philly-tuff" personna asking me if I'm "afraid" of anothers' tally on WT Docket 05-235. :-) NPRM 05-143 is *THE* issue for U.S. amateur radio in this new millennium. This is the end of the 15th week of filings in WT Docket 05-235 and the total is (to 27th October) 3,174 total. That's roughly 209 filings a week average, about four times more than on 98-143 ("Restructuring") in its 11 month open comment period. Brian, you've posted (I have a copy along with others from rrap who've filed on WT Docket 05-235) and so have others. But, for all his macho morsemanship, neither James P. Miccolis nor the mighty morsemen regulars in here have NOT filed! Sunnuvagun! |
|
#4
October 29th 05, 03:55 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Lennie's Scorecard Backfires
|
|
#5
October 29th 05, 04:02 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Lennie's Scorecard Backfires
On 28 Oct 2005 18:55:32 -0700, wrote:
wrote: Tsk, tsk, tsk...I think Jimmie-James is all for children VOTING in elections! I don't know who "Jimmie-James" is supposed to be, Len. But I'm not "all for children VOTING in elections". I'm just opposed to a minimum age requirement for an amateur radio license. Jim in answering the post I am afraid you just lied above Or perhaps, it is okay for children having state drivers' licenses... I don't think it's okay for children to have driver's licenses. I'm just opposed to a minimum age requirement for an amateur radio license. and Len supports the notion at this point I neither support nor oppose such a notion, but you have been beating this dead equine for years cuting reps _________________________________________ Usenet Zone Free Binaries Usenet Server More than 140,000 groups Unlimited download http://www.usenetzone.com to open account |
|
#6
October 29th 05, 04:35 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Lennie's Scorecard Backfires
wrote:
On 28 Oct 2005 18:55:32 -0700, wrote: wrote: Tsk, tsk, tsk...I think Jimmie-James is all for children VOTING in elections! I don't know who "Jimmie-James" is supposed to be, Len. But I'm not "all for children VOTING in elections". I'm just opposed to a minimum age requirement for an amateur radio license. Jim in answering the post I am afraid you just lied above Where? Len uses multiple names in his posts. I'm not sure who he means by "Jimmie-James". Is it me, or Jim Weir (who posts as "RSTEngineering") or somebody else? If he means me, *why* can't he just call me Jim, or N2EY? And it's a fact that I'm not "all for children VOTING in elections". I'm just opposed to a minimum age requirement for an amateur radio license. Or perhaps, it is okay for children having state drivers' licenses... I don't think it's okay for children to have driver's licenses. I'm just opposed to a minimum age requirement for an amateur radio license. and Len supports the notion at this point Why? Can he or anyone else supply *ANY* evidence that the lack of an age requirement has had *any* negative effects on the amateur radio service? We've had licensed amateur radio in the USA for 93 years now. In all that time there has *never* been an age requirement. So if the lack of an age requirement is a problem, there should be plenty of evidence by now. Yet Len provides no evidence, but wants an age requirement of 14 years for anyone to have a US amateur license. If you look at FCC enforcement letters, the age of the worst offenders is much closer to Len's age than to 14 years.... I neither support nor oppose such a notion, Why don't you oppose it? It's a completely unnecessary requirement for a license. No evidence has been presented to support it. |
|
#7
October 30th 05, 02:50 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Lennie's Scorecard Backfires
wrote: wrote: On 28 Oct 2005 18:55:32 -0700, wrote: wrote: Tsk, tsk, tsk...I think Jimmie-James is all for children VOTING in elections! I don't know who "Jimmie-James" is supposed to be, Len. But I'm not "all for children VOTING in elections". I'm just opposed to a minimum age requirement for an amateur radio license. Jim in answering the post I am afraid you just lied above Where? Len uses multiple names in his posts. I'm not sure who he means by "Jimmie-James". Is it me, or Jim Weir (who posts as "RSTEngineering") or somebody else? Then you must be dim-witted. If he means me, *why* can't he just call me Jim, or N2EY? All this confusion, then you go ahead and answer af if it were you he was referring to. That is the lie that Mark refers to. And it's a fact that I'm not "all for children VOTING in elections". Why would you care? He's not talking about what you are in favor of, is he? I'm just opposed to a minimum age requirement for an amateur radio license. Good for you. Len is in favor of an age requirement. Or perhaps, it is okay for children having state drivers' licenses... I don't think it's okay for children to have driver's licenses. I'm just opposed to a minimum age requirement for an amateur radio license. and Len supports the notion at this point Why? Why not? The books are full of minimum age requirements for various things. Can he or anyone else supply *ANY* evidence that the lack of an age requirement has had *any* negative effects on the amateur radio service? We've had licensed amateur radio in the USA for 93 years now. In all that time there has *never* been an age requirement. So if the lack of an age requirement is a problem, there should be plenty of evidence by now. Yet Len provides no evidence, but wants an age requirement of 14 years for anyone to have a US amateur license. If you look at FCC enforcement letters, the age of the worst offenders is much closer to Len's age than to 14 years.... It's possible that yet another arbitrary licensing requirement might be good for the ARS. Imagine all those 11, 12, and 13 year old trying to sneak in under the FCC's radar and get their licenses prematurely. Those poor old VE's will have to break out "thier" bi-focals and check for proper age. Imagine all the "job security" that Riley will have checking the birth dates of all those No-Code Technician wannabe's. I neither support nor oppose such a notion, Why don't you oppose it? It's a completely unnecessary requirement for a license. No evidence has been presented to support it. Morse Code in sheep's clothing? Hi! Just what we need is another unnecessary, arbitrary license requirement! |
|
#8
October 30th 05, 05:03 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Lennie's Scorecard Backfires
On 28 Oct 2005 19:35:45 -0700, wrote:
wrote: On 28 Oct 2005 18:55:32 -0700, wrote: wrote: Tsk, tsk, tsk...I think Jimmie-James is all for children VOTING in elections! I don't know who "Jimmie-James" is supposed to be, Len. But I'm not "all for children VOTING in elections". I'm just opposed to a minimum age requirement for an amateur radio license. Jim in answering the post I am afraid you just lied above Where? Hot ham handled that for me he is right I'll just you were being dense to need it Len uses multiple names in his posts. I'm not sure who he means by "Jimmie-James". Is it me, or Jim Weir (who posts as "RSTEngineering") or somebody else? If he means me, *why* can't he just call me Jim, or N2EY? And it's a fact that I'm not "all for children VOTING in elections". I'm just opposed to a minimum age requirement for an amateur radio license. Or perhaps, it is okay for children having state drivers' licenses... I don't think it's okay for children to have driver's licenses. I'm just opposed to a minimum age requirement for an amateur radio license. and Len supports the notion at this point Why? he has explained his reasoning over the years I agree there is something to it Can he or anyone else supply *ANY* evidence that the lack of an age requirement has had *any* negative effects on the amateur radio service? I doubt it he points out a peotencail bad effect but one that seems not to be problem We've had licensed amateur radio in the USA for 93 years now. In all that time there has *never* been an age requirement. So if the lack of an age requirement is a problem, there should be plenty of evidence by now. Yet Len provides no evidence, but wants an age requirement of 14 years for anyone to have a US amateur license. If you look at FCC enforcement letters, the age of the worst offenders is much closer to Len's age than to 14 years.... I neither support nor oppose such a notion, Why don't you oppose it? for the same reason I don't oppose voice testing before the voice modes, there is no serious proposal on the table to do anything about it It's a completely unnecessary requirement for a license. No evidence has been presented to support it. just like code testing which is why the later is likely out of the service very soon _________________________________________ Usenet Zone Free Binaries Usenet Server More than 140,000 groups Unlimited download http://www.usenetzone.com to open account |
|
#9
October 29th 05, 06:47 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Lennie's Scorecard Backfires
wrote: wrote: Brian, you've posted (I have a copy along with others from rrap who've filed on WT Docket 05-235) and so have others. But, for all his macho morsemanship, neither James P. Miccolis nor the mighty morsemen regulars in here have NOT filed! So? What's your point, Len? I'll "file" when I want to. Len, the old saying goes, if you don't "vote" you can't bitch. Except for these guys. They can bitch up a storm. |
|
#10
October 30th 05, 09:31 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Lennie's Scorecard Backfires
From: on Fri 28 Oct 2005 21:47
wrote: wrote: Brian, you've posted (I have a copy along with others from rrap who've filed on WT Docket 05-235) and so have others. But, for all his macho morsemanship, neither James P. Miccolis nor the mighty morsemen regulars in here have NOT filed! So? What's your point, Len? I'll "file" when I want to. Len, the old saying goes, if you don't "vote" you can't bitch. The U.S. Constitution has a (gasp!) "age requirment" minimum on voters! Jimmie has implied he is an EXPERT on military matters and can "judge" veterans. However he NEVER served one moment of time IN the military. [there's a minimum age requirement for that as well as a maximum age...:-) ] Except for these guys. They can bitch up a storm. In HERE. They seem to get "lost" when it comes time to communicate with their own government...but that does NOT stop them being judgemental to an ultimate degree in HERE. Jimmie will "file when he wants to." In order to be counted, he MUST file a Comment by October 31st and a Reply to Comments by November 14. Maybe he thinks (because of his "superiority") that the U.S. government will "listen to him" even if he files beyond the official ending date? [I'm sure he does] Jimmie ain't said he read ALL of the Comments in Docket 05-235. He's said he will NOT do his own tally...but he is QUICK to condemn and berate and call "inaccurate" the tallies of others! Anyplace else he would be called a hypocrite. In here he is a Morseman Extra. Beep, beep, huh-rawhhh! |
| Reply |
|
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| Scorecard on WT Docket 05-235 | Policy | |||
| Docket Scorecard | Policy | |||
| Docket 05-235 Scorecard | Policy | |||
| Lennie's Back In Form...Old Rant's...Same Form... | Policy | |||
| Lennie's Double Standard Once Again Revealed...BY Lennie! | Policy | |||
Hybrid Mode
