|
More Markie Mularkie
K4YZ wrote: stole from old friend wrote: more violationof of property right K4YZ wrote: raped an old friend wrote: violation of Proety right by K4YZ What's a "Proety right"...?!?! There's no such thing. K4YZ wrote: raped_by_an_old_friend wrote: You didn't correct Brian and tell him that Steve did not prescribe medicine, did you? no I did not nor do I feel there is anything to correct so why should try But that's NOT what you said in OTHER posts, Markie! I never said I felt there was anything to corect in any other post Stevie "correct" But that's not what you suggested in the previous post. what post and what are you talking about? Every recent post in which you suggest that I "prescribed" medication. And you substantiated that in the very post that you've now thrice quoted. There's not a single word in anything I've said that violates either the Nurse Practice Act OR the Medical Practice Act of the State of Tennessee...or any OTHER state, for THAT matter! it does violate the regs posted for LPN by the BoN of TN Nope. sure seems to What "seems" to you is nothing more than your inappropriate interpretation of something you HOPE you can use against me. The truth is something different. Keep dreaming, Markie. not dreaming Actually, DAYdreaming is more appropriate. nothing concerning is dream, a nightmare prehaps never a dream Again, you leave words out, disorganize others, and the meaning is lost. How does your imprecision with words become my splitting of hairs? no imprecision with word occoured therefore of course that is not what became your spliting of hairs Yes, a very OBVIOUS "imprecision" occured! where? that I choose not to dispute that others may form different opinion than mine? No, from your imprecison with the written word. what imprecision are you refering to? Your assinine attempt to suggest my "take an Ativan" comment was an attempot to prescribe a medicine. As for what may be a "different opinion" or what is just jibberish, who's to tell? me for one How can you tell? Your English comprehension skills, in a word, suck. Your grammar is worse. cut yes Then you're even more confused than you first appeared to be.... prehaps "perhaps" No "prehaps" to it...You're confused. another stevie lie How can THAT be? YOU have suggested that you ARE confused! You even requoted it right here! obviously I don't think so but you may be right There's no "may be" to it. yet another lie Again, how can it be? YOU suggested that I am right, and even quoted it in your OWN post! Both of these examples simply substantiate my opinion that you ARE confused! Your past fabrications regarding your military service and lies on numerous other topics, what lies on other topics? my lies conering my rank I can easily explain, and were obviously legal enough that dispite the fact Stevie claims to have reported the matter to the DoD no action was taken Lying about being a Field Grade commissioned officer is NOT legal under ANY circumstances, save perhaps for obvious theatrical performances. as was the case those years ago as I said it was clearly legal enough since the DoD did nothing in response to your complaints That the DoD has better things to do than intervene in a USENET exchange is one thing. meaning they found legal enough not to bother with, exactly as I said Not as you said. People "break laws" every day without being cited or prosecuted for them...But that does NOT legitimize their infractions. yep you would certainly know about that Stevie Nope. cuting steve being nonresponive What's "nonresponive"...?!?!? yes I can since they can no longer file charges, and never choose to file them espite your infroming them "chose" "despite" "informing" That they dismiss you as the nutcase you are does not lefitimize breaking the law. It just means you're probably THAT insignificant... Stevie it means as a matter of law I am inocent of the offense You are only innocent of an offense when so adjudicated by the court. I am inocent of any crime any crime til proved guilty get over it Get over what? That you're a liar and deceiver? respect the rule of law The law has not "ruled" here. I reported myself to the FBI all those years ago And they ALSO get people "confessing" to be JFK's assassin, to have been abducted by aliens and hundreds of other crank and obviously mentally inadequate states of mind ever year. so? So it puts you into that pile. still makes me an innocent man No, it means you've not had your day in court. an innocent man that you hound despite the legal facts of the case There are no "legal facts" until the evidence has been submitted to a court and deemed valid. So far that's not happened. No doubt you made the list. That you would "call and confess" only made you look more idiotic! but it legaly would start the clock on the staute of limitations "legally" "statute" Riiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii iight. right Uh huh. Thanks! for what? BBBWWWHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA HAHA HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA HA HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! I guess your ignorance really DOES know no bounds! and you refuse to enlighten me I've been trying...Lord knows I've been trying, as have dozens of others. You're beyond being "enlightened"...Sooooooooooooooooooo far beyond! your ideas on sexual fun--you don't think those might lessen your credibility? the State of TN requires that I not recieve any discrimination based on my sexuality so yes I expect that Tennesse to obey its own rules Hot flash, Hot Rod...No prosecutable act of discrimination has occured. agreed nor do I expect one to occour therefore I expect the State of TN to ignore my sexuality as I said to Dave So now we have TWO statements in ONE 12 hour period wherein you acknowledge that no censurable act has occured. nope we have no such stament at all we have Stevie lying again about what I have said Nope. I have YOUR words. Again, YOU requoted them in this most immediate post! You can't even follow your own words in the attributes! Thanks. I'll file this one too. if the State treats me with less credibility becuase of My sexuality then a violation would occour but I don't expect that to happen We can wrap you in Saran Wrap, .... no you can not that would be assualt "assault" hide every religious icon, tatoo or other mark or symbol you may wear or bear, and it won't make a difference. except those acts would be violating my civil rights gues you have not heard of the 1st amendment Oh, I've heard of it! And Markie, in the above exchanges, the First Ammendment has NOTHING TO DO WITH ANY OF THE COMMENTS. If you're going to invoke the Bill of Rights, Markie, invoke the RIGHT ONES! Idiot! Sheeeeeeeeeeesh! You've already admitted on occassions too numerous to catalog that you lie, do so liberally, and consider it to be a "right" and a morally just act. you keep omiting the full quote "in some cases" Oh Mr Markie! Don't YOU give ME any guff about "full quotes" ! ! ! We have a billion of your "cut" and "cuting" comments throughout RRAP! That's all I need, Markie. how does my lying allow you to claim Todds Father has Aids Your LYING has ALSO included numerous occassions wherein you've deceided to add your own "definitions". You failed to quote my "definition" of "AIDS". You've not been "denied" a seconds worth of "free speech" here, nor have you been denied the vote, kept from health care (indeed I think you are more in need than most) nor have you been impeded from one inch's worth of unfettered travel or free movement. never claimed any such thing Sure you have! nope Oh yes you have, Markie! (More Markie Lies!) You've made numerous rants wherein you've suggested that the exchanges herein somehow "prevented" you from getting something you think you deserve. Lately that "something" you THINK you deserve is "respect", suggesting that everyone in this forum has yet to "earn" it from you! THAT is the epitome of ARROGANCE! Good luck proving "discrimination". why I wasn't planing on trying to prove discrimnation (by the State of TN) nor claiming any had occoured or was likely to occour Three admissions of no violations or censurable acts. three lies Nope. your censurable acts concern your LYING not any act of the state of TN You've not "proved" a single one! cut if he lies about pumbing you can be sure I will It get's deeper and deeper. The liar threatening action against others for "lying":.... why not? you do Nope. yes you do OK Markie...if you say so! (snickersnickergigglegiggle.....) cut I know dave is one of them from his words as are you No, we're not. yes you are both of you More random words in search of order, Markie. cut Lot's of "cut" Markie. Guess you're getting tired of stuff to get your nose rubbed in, eh...?!?! none presented for your either You're the one spouting what real doctors would say. None have popped up here to challenge my diagnosis, Colonel. becuase you can't make one But you claim I have, Markie! yes I do but I was addresing Dave Dave can't make one He sure did! he isn't an LPN last time I heard therefore the standards of nursing don't aplly to him they do apply to you Sure they do! They "aplly" to you to! Since you seem to be having so much fun with the Tennessee Nurse Practice Act, I'll give you some time to find out why! It's in there! Good luck!~ get your attributions correct I did. YOU are confused again. you are confusing when you lie so much and so baddly yes "badly" You are confused becasue YOUR lies are so interwoven and complex, leaving your unable to keep all the stories straight. That ONE simple fact is why you keep getting tripped up on your own posts! The OTHER simple fact is that your misuse and abuse of the English language leaves you hanging out to dry! BTW why don't you stop your lying about addresing a Colonel Dave But YOU have refered to YOURSELF as a Colonel, Colonel. you lying about that to? Nope. yep Sheesh. You HAVE refered to yourself as a "Colonel" As you and Brain say..."Google provides"... but you are lying in reffering to me as one No... YOU were lying in refering to yourself as one. as to the other "charge" I am inncocent of it as a matter of law What's "inncocent"...?!?! As for being "guilty" of claiming that you were a Colonel, that was proven a long time ago. YOu continue to foul this newsgroup with your paranoid and juvenile posts. you foul it with your bigoted lying postings If you'll look to some of the material which appears above, you'll find at least two lies spouted by you. not a one Dave Yes...Several. nope S E V E R A L........................ not a one S E V E R A L......................... As to the accusations of bigotry on my part, deal with it. I will of course THAT would be a first. nope I deal with it all the time Obviously not. obvioulsy how? Obviously you have a problem "dealing" with reality. Everyone is a "bigot" to you. The only thing that IS "obvious" is that you misuse the word "bigot" I view your sexual perversity as being immoral. what sexual perverity? Geeze, Markie! You can't even quote a word in the very next sentence! but you evade the question while claerly understanding it Markie, there was no QUESTION posed there! another lie "what sexual perverity?" is a question That's NOT what I said, Markie! I said you couldn't even quote words correctly in the following sentence! As for the "QUESTION", that was the one you posed to DAVE. I was commenting on your abusive use of the King's English. A "question" is an interrogative, grammatically stated with the use of a question mark at the end of it. a lie is the willing willing stament of falsehood and you have lied in stateing, "Markie, there was no QUESTION posed there!" There wasn't. Not to me. FOLLOW THE ATTRIBUTES, BLOCKHEAD! cuting stevie libel There's no "libel". Just you making a fool of yourself. I've seen evidence of your frequent lying. really you see thing that don't exist then wow prehaps help is out there for you if you seek it not sure if you need an Optical felow or MD or an MSSW He needs none of the above. I think he does Based upon what professional credential of your own? no need for one Sure there is! Otherwise YOU are "practicing medicine" without a license. That's what YOU have been accusing ME of all week! I think you need much the same help too Same question. same answer Then you've made a NON-answer, Markie. "Evasion" You've shrouded yourself in victimhood and you want a free ride in life. another lie on your part Nope....Tons of posts attesting to same under any one of dozen or more screen names you've used in the last eight years. nope more Stevie lies Nope. You're only deluding yourself if you think so. you are the deluded one Nope. We have your posts to substantiate my conclusions. As you and Brain say, "Google provides". where? "www.google.com" Select "Groups", then "rec.radio.amateur.policy" You blame all of your numerous problems on others. another lie Dave Nope. yep Nope. Fact. As you and Brain like to say..."Google provides". no Yes. where? "www.google.com" Select "Groups", then "rec.radio.amateur.policy". Now, see if you can have me fired. where do you work? if it is your wosh that I try and get you fired, I am willing to help you out, but you need to provide the name of your boss a means of contacting him and I promise to look into it A "promise" from you is like using a roll of toilet paper to dry up Lake Erie. not at all Absolutely "at all". nope I have every intention of trying to get dave fired if he comfrimed that it is his wish I do so Uh huh. if Dave wishes me to get him fired all he needs to do is amke it clear that is what he wants give the means to contact his boss and I will get to work on it More empty threats. another lie from Stevie No threat at all Dave has offered a contract if he accept the services he seem to be requesting I will accept the deal and carry out the contract nothing threating in offering to cary out his wishes for him (unless we are talking about assiting him in suicide or something like that although I don't think that should be crime, the legal system does disagree at this time) but we both know (i know at least I hope you do but you know I can't be sure you do know) that Dave is talking #### Markie, That was priceless. cut the same offer extend to you, if you WANT me to get you fired tell me where you work the name of chian of supervisours and I will get to work on it BBBWWWHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA HAHA HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA HAHA HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA HA ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! I take it you decline my offer, might senible of you I must say "sensible" Markie, creeps like you call the hospitals EVERY DAY and try to "get Nurse So-and-So fired" for some perceived sleight. Your "attempts" from the UP would be dismissed just as rapidly as the local ones are. I can be quite generous with such things when i please The only thing you are "generous" with, Markie, is deceit and self-humiliation. more stevie lies Nope. "Google provides" Steve, K4YZ |
Tennessee Nurse: Steven J Robeson, LPN
an_old_friend wrote:
Dave Heil wrote: an_old_friend wrote: Dave Heil wrote: cut in the stuff als I cliped away scroll up in google I never claimed he was precirbing I claimed he parcticing medicine split hair all you like Brian made the statement and you commented on it. Brian Burke: "But here you are clearly prescribing a medication by name to a person by name, and following it up with the statement that it's your professional opinion. When you step outside your medical authority and prescribe medication to someone that you've never met or examined, you jump up and down and scream and cry that you aren't making a medical diagnosis." You didn't correct Brian and tell him that Steve did not prescribe medicine, did you? no I did not nor do I feel there is anything to correct There was, but you didn't notice. so why should try ....in the interest of accuracy. I sated that I never used accused him of presribing, I happen to think a more proper choice is to say that he acted unethicalin medial matter which as happens is the words of the regs that Govern Stevie's LPN status That's nice. How does your imprecision with words become my splitting of hairs? no imprecision with word occoured therefore of course that is not what became your spliting of hairs Based upon your two lines above, I rest my case. ...which is cause to have his license revoked or for him to suffer some kind of censure, according to state of TN BoN website Go for it, Colonel. You have a number of issues which might lessen your credibility. they might but not likely if I tell em about em up front They might not? indeed they might not Do you really believe that? yes I think you may be in for an awfully big surprise. Your past fabrications regarding your military service and lies on numerous other topics, what lies on other topics? C'mon, Mark! You've lied about any number of things here. You've lied about your military service and I don't mean just a single lie. You've lied to cover lies. It isn't like the stuff isn't archived. There are records of your lies and records of your lies uncovered. my lies conering my rank I can easily explain, and were obviously legal enough that dispite the fact Stevie claims to have reported the matter to the DoD no action was taken You've lied about rank. You've lied about circumstances regarding your release. You've lied about your work. You've lied about your IQ. You've lied about your income. You've lied about your trained pool of typists. You're a fabricator. by 7 yars of silence from the DoD I can legaly assume the assent of the DoD and the FBI to that How does one legally assume? I reported myself to the FBI all those years ago If that isn't another of your lies, it is a start. Why not call 'em and report yourself again? your ideas on sexual fun--you don't think those might lessen your credibility? the State of TN requires that I not recieve any discrimination based on my sexuality so yes I expect that Tennesse to obey its own rules Fine, Colonel. You can dress in full uniform and have a little game of beat me/spank me/pee on me. you seem to forget the care used by Phil(e) Kane I believe his name is in his posts being that he is an attonrney Are you trying to get Phil's license yanked? nope nor making any allusion to such I was pointing out the Licensed folks like Phil and Stevie have to be more carefull than the rest of us I have a friend who is a licensed plumber. I'll be sure to tell him to watch his P's and Q's when posting here, lest you attempt to have his license revoked. if he lies about pumbing you can be sure I will One cannot be sure of anything with the likes of you. Why not go after me for practicing medicine without a license? if you kgo ahaed and make about 8000 post like Stevie I'll look into it Sure you will, Mark. Go blow hot air toward someone likely to be impressed. firsdt make about 800 more post then we will see I'll post as I choose. You keep track of them and let me know when I've exceeded the limit. Alternatively, you can reduce the number to five and proceed next week. I'm telling you now that I don't care what silliness you pull. np I'll let you know np? I don't need you to let me know about anything. Make calls; write letters; stand on your roof with a bullhorn. if that is your desire you had better begin typing I'll type or not type as I choose, not as directed by you. You have no leverage whatever on me. i do if you want me to take a certain action You don't get it, Colonel: Take any action your little perverted heart desires. Write my mommy. you momy is alive what is her address I'll be only to happy to tell her what a hate filled bigot her son has turned into Are you too lazy to do anything for yourself? Write letters to the editor of your paper. Write letters to the editor of my paper. Take out an ad on WTOV-TV. Start a petition. You're a perverse twit and people will know it. Write my draft board. Contact the Today Show. Telephone Oprah. Your threats are empty. but if you want to be reported for practicing medicine without a license you need to start some serious typing Take two peach pits and call me in the morning. I still maintain, by the way, that I've made a correct diagnosis. but real doctors know you are wrong There is no factual evidence to support your claim. none presented for your either You're the one spouting what real doctors would say. None have popped up here to challenge my diagnosis, Colonel. becuase you can't make one Look at the lines I wrote above. I *did* make one. BTW why don't you stop your lying about addresing a Colonel Dave Oh, weren't you a Colonel in the U.S. Army Chemical Corps anymore? Was that a bald-faced lie? Was your IQ of 248, higher than that of any other living person, also a lie? Was your salary of 200-some thousand dollars a lie? YOu continue to foul this newsgroup with your paranoid and juvenile posts. you foul it with your bigoted lying postings If you'll look to some of the material which appears above, you'll find at least two lies spouted by you. not a one Dave Make that "at least three lies spouted by you". As to the accusations of bigotry on my part, deal with it. I will of course You haven't demonstrated that you are able to do so. I view your sexual perversity as being immoral. what sexual perverity? Aren't you the same Mark Morgan who is into bisexual S&M stuff with a little urination and defecation thrown in for good measure? I've seen evidence of your frequent lying. really you see thing that don't exist then wow prehaps help is out there for you if you seek it There's the story of your life, Mark. You're a pervert and everyone who isn't a pervert needs help. You can't write and won't use a spellchecker and it is the problem of everyone else. You can't learn morse code and it is someone else's fault. You tell numerous lies and begin to call numerous others "lier". not sure if you need an Optical felow or MD or an MSSW I believe that you aren't sure of much of anything. You've shrouded yourself in victimhood and you want a free ride in life. another lie on your part HF access in amateur radio? Others should have to try to decipher your writing? Mark is *special* and we have to make allowances for him. You blame all of your numerous problems on others. another lie Dave Mark Morgan on a number of issues: "Your problem" Now, see if you can have me fired. where do you work? I'm not going to hand you anything, Mark. Go to work. if it is your wosh that I try and get you fired, I am willing to help you out, but you need to provide the name of your boss a means of contacting him and I promise to look into it Oh? Did Steve provide you the name of his boss and a means of contacting him? Go to work, shirker. |
Another Baseless BrainRant
an_old_friend wrote:
I will be writing My report Hooooooooooooboy. You're a million grins, Mark. Dave K8MN |
Mark Morgan Acknowledges That He Has "No Factual Evidence"
K4YZ wrote:
an_old_friend wrote: Dave Heil wrote: an_old_friend wrote: Dave Heil wrote: Unlike you, Mark, there's nothing in my past which is likely to come back to bite me. You have documented issues. I have nothing to come back and bite me. nothing at all. BBBWWWHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA HAHAHA HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA HAHAHA HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA HAHA ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Mark lives in an alternate reality. Dave K8MN |
Tennessee Nurse: Steven J Robeson, LPN
On Wed, 09 Nov 2005 05:17:15 GMT, Dave Heil
wrote: an_old_friend wrote: Dave Heil wrote: an_old_friend wrote: Dave Heil wrote: cut in the stuff als I cliped away scroll up in google I never claimed he was precirbing I claimed he parcticing medicine split hair all you like Brian made the statement and you commented on it. Brian Burke: "But here you are clearly prescribing a medication by name to a person by name, and following it up with the statement that it's your professional opinion. When you step outside your medical authority and prescribe medication to someone that you've never met or examined, you jump up and down and scream and cry that you aren't making a medical diagnosis." You didn't correct Brian and tell him that Steve did not prescribe medicine, did you? no I did not nor do I feel there is anything to correct There was, but you didn't notice. nothing to correct it was and remains a fact that Stevie appreas to be abusing the preveldges of his LPN license, that exact dtails are unimportant HERE so why should try ...in the interest of accuracy. it is more acccurate than Stevie own post was, more accurate than most of yours I sated that I never used accused him of presribing, I happen to think a more proper choice is to say that he acted unethicalin medial matter which as happens is the words of the regs that Govern Stevie's LPN status That's nice. How does your imprecision with words become my splitting of hairs? no imprecision with word occoured therefore of course that is not what became your spliting of hairs Based upon your two lines above, I rest my case. what case? ...which is cause to have his license revoked or for him to suffer some kind of censure, according to state of TN BoN website Go for it, Colonel. You have a number of issues which might lessen your credibility. they might but not likely if I tell em about em up front They might not? indeed they might not Do you really believe that? yes I think you may be in for an awfully big surprise. you think that would be newsflash right Dave heil can think stop the presses the LAW say the issues you claim are not important I expect TN to obey its own laws in the USA today that may be a bit foolish but i will take the chance Your past fabrications regarding your military service and lies on numerous other topics, what lies on other topics? C'mon, Mark! You've lied about any number of things here. You've lied about your military service and I don't mean just a single lie. You've lied to cover lies. It isn't like the stuff isn't archived. There are records of your lies and records of your lies uncovered. wrong Dave like Stevie you think disagreeing with you is lying I have lied about my rank and that is all I have told some lies that have lead Stevie off on wild goose chases about my identity that is it andI have have said in the mix something these post is a lie as I was making em, nor was under oath how do these facts allow Stevie to claim someone has AIDS isn't lie about medical matters? how does that allow Stevie to LIE about the procedure of BoN so he can try to frighten someon into not reporting him? deal with reality Dave if you can my lies conering my rank I can easily explain, and were obviously legal enough that dispite the fact Stevie claims to have reported the matter to the DoD no action was taken You've lied about rank. yes You've lied about circumstances regarding your release. some You've lied about your work. no I haven't have never said anything detailed enough to lie about You've lied about your IQ. wrong again You've lied about your income. no i have not I have never stated my income you dolt therefore having never made such a statement I have never lie within such a statement You've lied about your trained pool of typists. nope You're a fabricator. when it serves to make me safer yes long ago admited by 7 yars of silence from the DoD I can legaly assume the assent of the DoD and the FBI to that How does one legally assume? by doing so I reported myself to the FBI all those years ago If that isn't another of your lies, it is a start. Why not call 'em and report yourself again? why report myself again? esp as No rime was comitted Stevei greatly over simplifies anything when he tlaks about the law your ideas on sexual fun--you don't think those might lessen your credibility? the State of TN requires that I not recieve any discrimination based on my sexuality so yes I expect that Tennesse to obey its own rules Fine, Colonel. You can dress in full uniform and have a little game of beat me/spank me/pee on me. and None of the is legaly something the BoN may consider you are a prude, but the LAW does not allow you to enforce that on everyone else grow up and get over it Dave you seem to forget the care used by Phil(e) Kane I believe his name is in his posts being that he is an attonrney Are you trying to get Phil's license yanked? nope nor making any allusion to such I was pointing out the Licensed folks like Phil and Stevie have to be more carefull than the rest of us I have a friend who is a licensed plumber. I'll be sure to tell him to watch his P's and Q's when posting here, lest you attempt to have his license revoked. if he lies about pumbing you can be sure I will One cannot be sure of anything with the likes of you. you and ESP Stevie should remember that you don't know what I can or will do Indeed just for illustration if i happened to paranoid threat to myself and other Stevie has claimed to be "his professional opinion" (and if anything gets him besides mouthing to an investagtor those words wil be it) pushing proding trying to rerate someone like risk his own life and you would be risking your iF I were what Stevie says I am you nor I can know very much about a person based on the degree on contact you have with me Why not go after me for practicing medicine without a license? if you kgo ahaed and make about 8000 post like Stevie I'll look into it Sure you will, Mark. Go blow hot air toward someone likely to be impressed. firsdt make about 800 more post then we will see I'll post as I choose. You keep track of them and let me know when I've exceeded the limit. Alternatively, you can reduce the number to five and proceed next week. I'm telling you now that I don't care what silliness you pull. np I'll let you know np? I don't need you to let me know about anything. Make calls; write letters; stand on your roof with a bullhorn. you asked me to let you know I promised to do as YOU asked Dave if that is your desire you had better begin typing I'll type or not type as I choose, not as directed by you. You have no leverage whatever on me. i do if you want me to take a certain action You don't get it, Colonel: Take any action your little perverted heart desires. Write my mommy. you momy is alive what is her address I'll be only to happy to tell her what a hate filled bigot her son has turned into Are you too lazy to do anything for yourself? No Write letters to the editor of your paper. why? Write letters to the editor of my paper. which paper is yours? Take out an ad on WTOV-TV. Start a petition. You're a perverse twit and people will know it. realy? you do have such a rich fantasy life Dave Write my draft board. Contact the Today Show. Telephone Oprah. Your threats are empty. but if you want to be reported for practicing medicine without a license you need to start some serious typing Take two peach pits and call me in the morning. I still maintain, by the way, that I've made a correct diagnosis. but real doctors know you are wrong There is no factual evidence to support your claim. none presented for your either You're the one spouting what real doctors would say. None have popped up here to challenge my diagnosis, Colonel. becuase you can't make one Look at the lines I wrote above. I *did* make one. if you have Stevie has if Stevie has he will likely lose his licens or be oteherwise punished but you are fool if you I am going to take on everyone at once Stvie has ****ed me off enough and he is far greater danger from a medical practice issue than ANYONE in the NG only Phil Kane has to be more careful and since he is an antonry not a paralegal (Stevie is the nursing version of a paralegal) he has greater latittude in giving professional LEGAL oppinions than Stevie has in Giving PROFESSIONAL nursing opinions grow face facts BTW why don't you stop your lying about addresing a Colonel Dave Oh, weren't you a Colonel in the U.S. Army Chemical Corps anymore? right said years ago I wasn;t a colonel, only YOU and stevie have been trying to continue that lie other the years Was that a bald-faced lie? Was your IQ of 248, higher than that of any other living person, also a lie? nope it was the result of test done many years ago Was your salary of 200-some thousand dollars a lie? never said my salery was 200K I said I turned a job that would paid 240K, and I did do that that you choose to assume I did so becuase I was claiming to make that or more is not my fault You just lied Dave YOu continue to foul this newsgroup with your paranoid and juvenile posts. you foul it with your bigoted lying postings If you'll look to some of the material which appears above, you'll find at least two lies spouted by you. not a one Dave Make that "at least three lies spouted by you". where disgreeing with you or confsuing you becuase you can't think or understand what is being said isn't lying indeed if you are ever being truthfull yourself ain your claims you don't understand my writting you can't realy claim you know anything I say As to the accusations of bigotry on my part, deal with it. I will of course You haven't demonstrated that you are able to do so. where? are you using some specail definiation of "deal" i should know about I don't deal with it as you would like it seems But I need not please your sensiblities Indeed that is what you and Stevie are all about. Yoou two carries these chips on your shoulders thinking everyone around must confrom toyour expectations I view your sexual perversity as being immoral. what sexual perverity? Aren't you the same Mark Morgan who is into bisexual S&M stuff with a little urination and defecation thrown in for good measure? again what sexual perverity You by my starndard are the prevert I've seen evidence of your frequent lying. really you see thing that don't exist then wow prehaps help is out there for you if you seek it There's the story of your life, Mark. nope perhaps yours from all apearances You're a pervert and everyone who isn't a pervert needs help. You can't write and won't use a spellchecke... and your and stevie whine and whine about it Killfle me that is your previeledge ....r and it is the problem of everyone else. not everyones Dave only those that CHOOSE to try and read my stuff you are showing signs of meglomania in claiming your veiwpoint is the only viewpoint You can't learn morse code ..... true enough .....and it is someone else's fault. never claimed that is another lie from you Dave I have never claimed that my lack of ability is ANYBODIES fault It the fault of others that Codes testing contues to be requiredbut that is another matter You tell numerous lies wrong and begin to call numerous others "lier". I have caled 4 people liars (the Comode and the various slits are not proven to be people on their own so they don't count) and I have called on lies you have lied today in saying I claimed a 200k income I have not you asumed incorrectly that that came as the only reason I would turn down a job making 240K. That you are (I infer from your action) a person that would do anything for money ( or something like that) and you assume everyone is like you (given the obvious differences betwen us assuming I would do anything the same way as you is REALY stupid Dave) is not my fault you making incorrctly making assumetion beyond what I have said does not make me liar but when you make make statement of fact based on your incorect deduction it makes you the liar not sure if you need an Optical felow or MD or an MSSW I believe that you aren't sure of much of anything. true enough I am abosolutely sure of nothing. after all I believe in the reality of Heisenburg's work, as well as , being a general skeptic You've shrouded yourself in victimhood and you want a free ride in life. another lie on your part HF access in amateur radio? how does this question relate to your claim? Hf access is needed for life? how is taking part in the porcess of making the rules as provided for by law asking for a free ride in life? Others should have to try to decipher your writing? you DON"T have to try to deipher my writing. I have never said you do. You choose to do so, if you don't like the rsults of your efforts make another CHOICE nonone is holding a gun to your head and forcing you is there? certainly not by my order, if you think someone is holding a gun to head and making you read my stuf call 911, i am certain (a rarity for me) that in this event and you call someone will help you. Mark is *special* and we have to make allowances for him. never said that anywhere that is another lie in claiming I have You blame all of your numerous problems on others. another lie Dave Mark Morgan on a number of issues: "Your problem" so if you can reason correctly this not my problem I refer you to detailed response above to your lie about my claim of a 200k income I have not blamed you for any of MY rpoblems, I have points out you have your own problem Now, see if you can have me fired. where do you work? I'm not going to hand you anything, Mark. Go to work. do you want me to get fired or not? if it is your wosh that I try and get you fired, I am willing to help you out, but you need to provide the name of your boss a means of contacting him and I promise to look into it Oh? Did Steve provide you the name of his boss and a means of contacting him? Go to work, shirker. we are talking about YOU if you truely want me to get you fired then you are asking for my help and to get it you must pay MY price I don't want you or Stevie fired from your jobs for my own sake. In Stevies case we may end up there and indeed the result may turn out to be Stevie losing his job but that is not in fact my true aim, it may be what happens but we shall see _________________________________________ Usenet Zone Free Binaries Usenet Server More than 140,000 groups Unlimited download http://www.usenetzone.com to open account |
Another Baseless BrainRant
On Wed, 09 Nov 2005 05:19:44 GMT, Dave Heil
wrote: an_old_friend wrote: I will be writing My report Hooooooooooooboy. You're a million grins, Mark. truely gald to be of service Dave K8MN _________________________________________ Usenet Zone Free Binaries Usenet Server More than 140,000 groups Unlimited download http://www.usenetzone.com to open account |
Mark Morgan Acknowledges That He Has "No Factual Evidence"
On Wed, 09 Nov 2005 05:24:38 GMT, Dave Heil
wrote: K4YZ wrote: an_old_friend wrote: Dave Heil wrote: an_old_friend wrote: Dave Heil wrote: Unlike you, Mark, there's nothing in my past which is likely to come back to bite me. You have documented issues. I have nothing to come back and bite me. nothing at all. BBBWWWHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA HAHAHA HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA HAHAHA HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA HAHA ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Mark lives in an alternate reality. no i live in the real world you live a fantasy govened by your views on life Dave K8MN _________________________________________ Usenet Zone Free Binaries Usenet Server More than 140,000 groups Unlimited download http://www.usenetzone.com to open account |
markie will sueTennessee Nurse: Steven J Robeson, LPN
wrote in message ... nothing to correct it was and remains a fact that Stevie appreas to be abusing the preveldges of his LPN license, that exact dtails are unimportant HERE Based upon your two lines above, I rest my case. the LAW say the issues you claim are not important I expect TN to obey its own laws in the USA today that may be a bit foolish but i will take the chance Markie is going to sue!!!! go get them little buddy! |
Steven J Robeson, LPN
itchy sanshez wrote: markie will sueTennessee Nurse: Steven J Robeson, LPN the the poster being responded to (is it Stevie or Dave I wonder) is lying I have no current intentions to sue stevie+ about the only thing truthfull was the poster efort to crosspost to NG continaing the word Kook in the tile and th kook is the poster i am responding to wrote in message ... nothing to correct it was and remains a fact that Stevie appreas to be abusing the preveldges of his LPN license, that exact dtails are unimportant HERE Based upon your two lines above, I rest my case. the LAW say the issues you claim are not important I expect TN to obey its own laws in the USA today that may be a bit foolish but i will take the chance Markie is going to sue!!!! go get them little buddy! |
Another Baseless BrainRant
Dave Heil wrote:
an_old_friend wrote: I will be writing My report Hooooooooooooboy. You're a million grins, Mark. Dave K8MN If he can't write a report that makes any more sense than the gibberish he posts hear, the people who get it will just throw it away as so much garbage. |
Tennessee Nurse: Steven J Robeson, LPN
wrote: K4YZ wrote: an_old_friend wrote: wrote: wrote: Steve Robeson May 30 2000, 2:00 am hide options Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.policy From: (Steve Robeson) - Find messages by this author Date: 2000/05/30 Subject: Kim's Callsign Reply to Author | Forward | Print | Individual Message | Show original | Report Abuse Subject: Kim's Callsign From: (T.L. Bryant) Date: 05/29/2000 8:07 PM Central Daylight Time Thank you, Sigmund. Now, if our inadequacies offend you so much, please turn your radio off, or change the frequency to something that isn't so inadequate for you. Ooooooohhhhhh! We hit a bit close to HOME, did we, Tom? I didn't say ANYTHING about being inadeqaute for ME. I placed that onus upon those who find it necessary to resort to "shock-jock" antics and callsigns. Take an Ativan, Tom. That's my professional suggestion. Steve The nation that is ready to fight in peacetime is less likely to HAVE to fight in wartime......(Author unknown, but he probably wasn't a politician!) Hmmm? Is Tennessee Nurse: Steven J Robeson, LPN prescribing meds? so it would seem med by name in his professional opinion like you said Google provide You're welcome to try and document this as an attempt to "prescribe". I'll offer the BopN my congratualtions on reserving thier laughter now..... Steve, K4YZ "their" Steve, when I put forth my opinion that you were nuts, you jumped up and down asking where my medical degree came from, screaming and crying like a little baby that I had made a medical diagnosis. But here you are clearly prescribing a medication by name to a person by name, and following it up with the statement that it's your professional opinion. When you step outside your medical authority and prescribe medication to someone that you've never met or examined, you jump up and down and scream and cry that you aren't making a medical diagnosis. You're such a two-faced little skunk. Best of Luck with the board. Five minutes on Google provides. Here's two such incidents. There are more. Steve tried to use his professional license to: 1. diagnose a mental illness over the internet, and 2. get someone in another state committed with a simple phone call. _________________________________ Quote 348. Steve Robeson K4CAP Mar 25 2004, 9:17 am hide options Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.policy From: (Steve Robeson K4CAP) - Find messages by this author Date: 25 Mar 2004 14:17:01 GMT Local: Thurs, Mar 25 2004 9:17 am Subject: Ham-radio is a hobby not a service Reply to Author | Forward | Print | Individual Message | Show original | Report Abuse - Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Subject: Ham-radio is a hobby not a service From: (William) Date: 3/24/2004 6:08 PM Central Standard Time Message-id: (Steve Robeson K4CAP) wrote in message ... Subject: Ham-radio is a hobby not a service From: (William) Date: 3/19/2004 6:16 PM Central Standard Time Message-id: I know only one Steve Roberson and he's nuts. Well..."Steve Roberson" MAY be nuts. I am not. YOU, on the other hand, are not truthful. Steve, K4YZ I stand corrected. Steve Robeson is nuts. You've made another assertion of fact, Brain. That assertion would be, in most cases, the rendering of a diagnosis, which requires a degree as a medical doctor. Are you now telling us that you are a medical doctor? Please cite what criteria you base this diagnosis on? That I have labled you a liar after having presented you with your own words only to have you try and deny it...?!?! Or that I have labeled you a liar becasue you've made OTHER assertions of fact for which you refuse to corroborate with some reasonably valid documentation? Steve, K4YZ End Quote _________________________________ Quote 160. Steve Robeson, K4CAP Jun 28 2004, 1:58 am hide options Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.policy From: (Steve Robeson, K4CAP) - Find messages by this author Date: 27 Jun 2004 23:58:14 -0700 Local: Mon, Jun 28 2004 1:58 am Subject: Temper Fry, Was Able Baker Charlie Reply to Author | Forward | Print | Individual Message | Show original | Report Abuse (William) wrote in message . com... He yell and yell, he hate me and hate me. Now he say he spect better from me. Maybe trap or lie. I no trust. He noisy. He yell and yell. Why he want military gear? I 'member. He say he militia. Why he fixated with boys? He need get help. Take somekinda sumptin. No badge as boy. Must compensate now. I re-extend my offer to use my professional contacts to help you, Brain. It always looks better on your record to appear as having been aware you ahve a problem and taking steps to fix it, than to be involuntarilly commited in order to force the issue. I can make that happen for you, Brain. Shall I make the call....?!?!? Steve, K4YZ End Quote ------------------------------------------------ |
Tennessee Nurse: Steven J Robeson, LPN
|
More Markie Mularkie
|
More Markie Mularkie
K4YZ wrote: wrote: On Wed, 09 Nov 2005 05:17:15 GMT, Dave Heil wrote: an_old_friend wrote: cut nor do I feel there is anything to correct There was, but you didn't notice. nothing to correct it was and remains a fact that Stevie appreas to be abusing the preveldges of his LPN license, that exact dtails are unimportant HERE They're unimportant ANYwhere, Markie. then you are lying in claiming any harm can come to me in report ing you if you can not be damaged by what I do you are not harmed by it, if you are not harmed no civil case, try a basic study guide to law Try as you will, there's not one thing in this NG that the BoN will be able to consider for censure. then if true you have been lying about the consequences of my actions in reporting the matter Not a one. You may continue to lie to yourself and make up tales for the NG all you care to. you are and have been lying to yourself and the NG for years so why should try ...in the interest of accuracy. it is more acccurate than Stevie own post was, more accurate than most of yours Riiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii ght...... you agree than cut Based upon your two lines above, I rest my case. what case? Hey Dave... He's too danged stupid to realize what he said or did...Let's just let him dwell on it and laugh at him while he chases his tail! what case? cut in the USA today that may be a bit foolish but i will take the chance And Tennessee will. which means that tennesse will not be considering such things a s my sexuality and that dave was wrong in saying they would And when they are done, MY attorneys get to earn their keep! for what? if you are telling the truth then you will not be harmed in any way by my action, therefore no tort was done therefore no case exists for them to prusue If I am right then you also have no case you are in a no win affair sir you may be able to break even but that is all THAT will be the end of KB9RQZ's USENET spamming days! another lie from Stevie I do not spam the NG thef0ore it is will not end any spaming by me cut I have lied about my rank and that is all I have told some lies that have lead Stevie off on wild goose chases about my identity that is it You've not led me on one single goose chase, Markie! yes I have You were never an officer in the Armed Forces. Period. back pedaling again you normaly I never served do make up your mind You were never drafted. never said I was inducted by draft, you assmued that by choosing ( or being unable) to understand a turn of phrase You are not being held hostage by a CO who refuses to let you resign despite your avowed perversions. never said that either andI have have said in the mix something these post is a lie as I was making em, nor was under oath backpeddlebackpeddlebackpeddlebackpeddlebckpeddleb ckpeddlebackpeddle I call it CYA but if you like prefer the term back peddle but you should use better formating if you are going to play gramous and spelling cop how do these facts allow Stevie to claim someone has AIDS isn't lie about medical matters? and you are avoiding this issue how does that allow Stevie to LIE about the procedure of BoN so he can try to frighten someon into not reporting him? Hey Markie...I said GO AHEAD AND DO IT! I have according to BoN the investagation will take months but you still have not explained how my lying allows to to lie and say Todds father has aids But I ALSO said that when your malicous attack is over, then I get to play!... no malicous atack exists deal with reality Dave if you can I dare say Dave's reality is a heck of a lot closer TO reality than you, Sparky! who are you adressing sir ;) my lies conering my rank I can easily explain, and were obviously legal enough that dispite the fact Stevie claims to have reported the matter to the DoD no action was taken You've lied about rank. yes A lie is a lie. Period. then Ferman went to jail for perjury at the OJ trial? You've lied about circumstances regarding your release. some No. Not "some". some you don't know the facts YOU stated that your "CO" refused to allow you to resign. yes I did You've lied about your work. no I haven't have never said anything detailed enough to lie about Sure you did. You said you were in the US Army Chemical Corps. We need no more than that. but I was so no lie exists You've lied about your IQ. wrong again Obviously you HAVE lied. simple falsehood on your part You claim a 248, yet can't seem to master grade school English You are now alicensed school teacher? or the insatllation of simple spellchecker software.. how do I install a spell checker on google? You've lied about your income. no i have not I have never stated my income you dolt You're the dolt. You HAVE stated your income. where? I have never stated my income ever except in scuh terms as enough to suits my needs I have stated the incomeof a job i turned down 240K that you wrongly choose to assume I was claiming that income level for myself is YOUR mistake not mine therefore having never made such a statement I have never lie within such a statement backpeddlebackpeddlebackpeddlebackpeddlebckpeddleb ckpeddlebackpeddle nope you and Dave assumed a statement meant several other things beyond what was said You've lied about your trained pool of typists. nope Yep. prove it You're a fabricator. when it serves to make me safer yes long ago admited cuting stevie obsene display by 7 yars of silence from the DoD I can legaly assume the assent of the DoD and the FBI to that How does one legally assume? by doing so Yeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeah......Riiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii iiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiight........ .......... report me again the result will be no action meaning I am innocent of the allegation asa matter of law I reported myself to the FBI all those years ago If that isn't another of your lies, it is a start. Why not call 'em and report yourself again? why report myself again? esp as No rime was comitted Stevei greatly over simplifies anything when he tlaks about the law Was that a sentence? yes cut Fine, Colonel. You can dress in full uniform and have a little game of beat me/spank me/pee on me. and None of the is legaly something the BoN may consider You think the BoN wouldn't consider your state of mind under such circumstances...?!?! they can't nor does any defect in myself allow you to claim I have aids or anyone else has aids cut you are a prude, but the LAW does not allow you to enforce that on everyone else grow up and get over it Dave Musta slipped Dave's name in there while talking to yourself, Markie...... nope gues you can't read I am certainly not a prude, by any standard cut One cannot be sure of anything with the likes of you. you and ESP Stevie should remember that you don't know what I can or will do Sure we can. We KNOW you can lie. I certainly can nothing ilegal in thatt We KNOW you can deceive. sure thing I can it is a skill I am proud of We KNOW you are a deviant with potentially unlawful conduct in teh presence of minors. there you go again with the pedophile/child abuse charges We KNOW you will attempt to place yourself in the position of "victim" in order to feign innocence. another lie I am inocent I have done nothing to you ever, and yet you have attacked me since you arrived you lie about me and deny do so you make vile unture claims about me Indeed just for illustration if i happened to paranoid threat to myself and other Stevie has claimed to be "his professional opinion" (and if anything gets him besides mouthing to an investagtor those words wil be it) pushing proding trying to rerate someone like risk his own life and you would be risking your iF I were what Stevie says I am What was that? read it and find out cut you nor I can know very much about a person based on the degree on contact you have with me Sure we can. you cant determine what you claim to have determined cuting the repiting of load BS you momy is alive what is her address I'll be only to happy to tell her what a hate filled bigot her son has turned into Are you too lazy to do anything for yourself? No I am sure you are. you can think what you like I am sure you seldom stray more than 30 feet in any direction from the computer and/or refrigerator. you are wrong of course but at lests it is harmless mistake unlike you aids claim Write letters to the editor of your paper. why? So your neighbors can see what kind of an illiterate fool you are. gee I ahve written scuh letters none of my neight sem to think so a couple would like to burn me at statke for one in which I said the world was coming to a sudden firery end if Gay were allowed to marry and I got pretty good reveiws on one where I said the 10 comenedants had their place just not in public school but the question which you choose to misunderstand was why should I write a letter to editor localy about Dave context man you realy need to work on context cut none presented for your either You're the one spouting what real doctors would say. None have popped up here to challenge my diagnosis, Colonel. becuase you can't make one Look at the lines I wrote above. I *did* make one. if you have Stevie has if Stevie has he will likely lose his licens or be oteherwise punished More random letters and occassional words in search of order, Markie...... more stevei making fun of the disale which is defined as abuse when done by a sprofesional in medical feild by the state of TN BTW although it is not covered through the BoN but you are fool if you I am going to take on everyone at once You couldn't "take on" on of the "Pink Ladies" at the hospital auxiliary in a game of Bingo. No I could not I loath bingo, makes me want to throw up, but your point wass or were just vilifiing again? Stvie has ****ed me off enough..........(SNIP) Ooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooh! Markie-warkie is MAD! (UNSNIP)....and he is far greater danger from a medical practice issue than ANYONE in the NG only Phil Kane has to be more careful and since he is an antonry...(SNIP) He is? he says so he apprears to be I thought he was an attorney. **** you and your spelling cop ****, and hope youare in fact lying when you claim I have aids (UNSNIP)...not a paralegal (Stevie is the nursing version of a paralegal) Oh? It doesn't say "Paranurse" any where on my license. never said it did And Markie...there's only about six things I cannot due as an LPN that I will be able to du as an RN. Do YOU know what they are? I do... the reference is not to the difference bewtween LPN and RN but nurses and Doctors if you understood english you would realize i i was saying Nurses are to Doctors as Paralegals are to Attonreys cut Oh, weren't you a Colonel in the U.S. Army Chemical Corps anymore? right said years ago I wasn;t a colonel, only YOU and stevie have been trying to continue that lie other the years But you HAVE lied about it. yes I have What you haven't done is APOLOGIZE for it. but I have However that was made to DoD which is the body entitled to it cut Was your salary of 200-some thousand dollars a lie? never said my salery was 200K I said I turned a job that would paid 240K, and I did do that cuting steveie evdading the issue that you choose to assume I did so becuase I was claiming to make that or more is not my fault You just lied Dave No he didn't. yes he did cut Make that "at least three lies spouted by you". where disgreeing with you or confsuing you becuase you can't think or understand what is being said isn't lying "...or confsuing you..." What you meant to say is that you are trying to intentionally deceive... I am not responible for what you and Dave try to misread into something That IS a lie, Markie. meaning Dave was in fact lying by questioning me about my 200k income trying to deceive everyone into believing I said something I had not indeed if you are ever being truthfull yourself ain your claims you don't understand my writting you can't realy claim you know anything I say I say you're an idiot. You claim to have an IQ of 248 but then write sentences like the last three above. that is what being LD is all about Stevie, indeed it lies close to very meaning fo the term LD As to the accusations of bigotry on my part, deal with it. I will of course You haven't demonstrated that you are able to do so. where? Anywhere. no where Yoou two carries these chips on your shoulders thinking everyone around must confrom toyour expectations No... YOU are the one with the chip...The one that says "The World Owes Me Everything And I Owe It Nothing". never said anything of the sort you are lying again I view your sexual perversity as being immoral. what sexual perverity? Aren't you the same Mark Morgan who is into bisexual S&M stuff with a little urination and defecation thrown in for good measure? again what sexual perverity Thanks for providing ME with the stuff I need, Markie. for what to claim Todd father has AIDS let me help you then I am Bisexual kinky Dave is leing about defaction of course but who cares other than you You by my starndard are the prevert "standard" "pervert". Riiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii iiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiight. you too by my religious standard you and everyone else in the NG is a prevert by being either Homo or Heterosexual, by defining the ability to love soley based on what is between one legs you defile the very principles of nature and of the devine by the first amendant I am allowed to believe it unlike you and dave I dont go around demanding that anyone else confrom to my religious standards cut ....r and it is the problem of everyone else. not everyones Dave only those that CHOOSE to try and read my stuff So then you acknowldge that you intentionally spam USENET with semi-illiterate dreck in an attempt to create disorganization and confusion. no i don't in detail I don't spam the usenet at all I am not intionaly illeterate at all ( I am untintetionaly and unwillingly disgraphic but that is not the same) I make no amttepmt to create disorder and/or confusion four false statements in one, Stevie you going for a record? you are showing signs of meglomania in claiming your veiwpoint is the only viewpoint W H E R E did Dave say "Mine is the only viewpoint"...?!?!?! in claiming as you do BTWthat your sexual morality is the only valid one amoug other such efforts You can't learn morse code ..... true enough cut off topic remark .....and it is someone else's fault. never claimed that is another lie from you Dave Nope...You have. another stevie lie I have never claimed that my lack of ability is ANYBODIES fault Sure you have...You went on and on once upon a time about how you were failed by your special ed teachers. no I have not I siad there effort failed I never said it was their fault It the fault of others that Codes testing contues to be requiredbut that is another matter "Fault"...?!?! You tell numerous lies wrong N U M E R O U S lies. nope cut the ranting and begin to call numerous others "lier". I have caled 4 people liars (the Comode and the various slits are not proven to be people on their own so they don't count) and I have called on lies ctuing stevie rants you have lied today in saying I claimed a 200k income I have not you asumed incorrectly that that came as the only reason I would turn down a job making 240K. That you are (I infer from your action) a person that would do anything for money ( or something like that) and you assume everyone is like you (given the obvious differences betwen us assuming I would do anything the same way as you is REALY stupid Dave) is not my fault you making incorrctly making assumetion beyond what I have said does not make me liar but when you make make statement of fact based on your incorect deduction it makes you the liar cuting more stevie tnagents .. not sure if you need an Optical felow or MD or an MSSW I believe that you aren't sure of much of anything. true enough I am abosolutely sure of nothing. Including your English skills. agreed after all I believe in the reality of Heisenburg's work, as well as , being a general skeptic There are some things you really, REALLY ought to NOT be skeptical about, Markie... more of your efforts to imply your way is the only way cut Hf access is needed for life? Obviously for you and Lennie, it is.... bull**** another made up charge on your part how is taking part in the porcess of making the rules as provided for cut Mark is *special* and we have to make allowances for him. never said that anywhere Sure you have! Every single one of your "I'll file an ADA claim" rants! never made such a rant that is another lie in claiming I have No...it's another "Google provides" moment. then let it provide if it could You blame all of your numerous problems on others. another lie Dave Mark Morgan on a number of issues: "Your problem" so if you can reason correctly this not my problem I refer you to detailed response above to your lie about my claim of a 200k income Markie, nice try trying to spin ONE issue into an entire whitewash of YOUR lies, YOUR deceit, YOUR cowardace and YOUR misconduct. I choose not to waste more bandwidwith on an issue you and Dave have decided to lie about I have not blamed you for any of MY rpoblems, I have points out you have your own problem What problems? Being intolerant of liars and deceivers is a "probem"...?!?! yes cut if it is your wosh that I try and get you fired, I am willing to help you out, but you need to provide the name of your boss a means of contacting him and I promise to look into it Oh? Did Steve provide you the name of his boss and a means of contacting him? Go to work, shirker. we are talking about YOU Hey Markie! Who was the one whining about "carrying others freight"...?!?! me bu that isnt the issue You want it? You earn it! But I don't Dave fired Indeed I think I want him to get lots more hours at work so he doesn't have to time to come here and talk **** OH! Wait a minute.....W H A T W A S I T H I N K I N G ? ! ? ! ? ! ? ! ? Your whole reason for being in this forum is about getting what you haven't earned! more lies stveie from you Silly me! WHAT was I thinking...?!?! do you even know what you are thinking? do you even think? if you truely want me to get you fired then you are asking for my help and to get it you must pay MY price I don't want you or Stevie fired from your jobs for my own sake. Oooooops! Markie caught in BIG LIE! nope Markie...What do you think my employer would do if the BoN granted your wishes and revoked my Nursing license...?!?! you would be fired, however your being fired is not my goal, it would be side effect one indeed that I would regret since it would give you more time to hang here what I want is justice. in your case true justice would be your being behind bars withe rumour put outthere that you are pedophile and child killer but they could trump up some minor charge due to lack of evidence, then the prisons would show the dangers created with false claims of child abuse and pedophilia. That IMO would be justice for you. forunately there is zero chance of your getting that treatment. Faling that there IS Justice IMO in the happnestance of the man who claims he will not tolerate lying being punished in any way for lying See! You CAN'T have your cake and eat it too! but I don't want the cake you think I want you don't understand me Stevie I don't realy understand you ( not that I want to, and likely you think the same) In Stevies case we may end up there and indeed the result may turn out to be Stevie losing his job but that is not in fact my true aim, it may be what happens but we shall see You go RIGHT AHEAD, Markie! going right ahead but you could do us a favor and hold breath till it is over;) Steve, K4YZ |
Tennessee Nurse: Steven J Robeson, LPN
|
Tennessee Nurse: Steven J Robeson, LPN
Dave Heil wrote:
wrote: On Wed, 09 Nov 2005 05:17:15 GMT, Dave Heil wrote: cut How does your imprecision with words become my splitting of hairs? no imprecision with word occoured therefore of course that is not what became your spliting of hairs Based upon your two lines above, I rest my case. what case? Are you narcoleptic? no Do you recall my comments about your imprecision with words? You proved it above. See your terms "occoured" and "spliting". wrong again I simply proved I suffer from Dyslexia and what the doc termed Dyslexiod aphasia I used the terms pricisely cut I think you may be in for an awfully big surprise. you think that would be newsflash right I think it would be newsflash? No, I think you may be in for a surprise. you thinking would be the newsflash I might be in for a suprise but I can see how Stevie or BoN can claim that who I may have sex with allows Stevie to say I have AIDS Dave heil can think stop the presses Okay, I've thought, "stop the presses". Did it happen? nope becuase you failed to think the LAW say the issues you claim are not important What issues did I claim are not important? you did not I did but the issues refer to are my sexuality and my alleged criminality both are legaly irrelevant in this matter I expect TN to obey its own laws Oh, I'd expect that it does. as do I But if you don't think that anyone there would be interested in who is submitting a complaint and why, I am sure they will curious, but I expect them to be profesional in the end don't you? I think you are going to be surprised. no suprise indeed in making my report they will told of these "issues" since knowing the turth will be requiredin order to explain Stevie actions in the USA today that may be a bit foolish but i will take the chance You don't believe that U.S. states generally follow the laws they have enacted? not always the US is better about it than most nation but I believe that the US is still imperfect, and liekly always will be to some extent. I also know that one of the areas in which the US most often shows its imperfections is in the treatement of those of its people that are "defferent" in some way Your past fabrications regarding your military service and lies on numerous other topics, what lies on other topics? C'mon, Mark! You've lied about any number of things here. You've lied about your military service and I don't mean just a single lie. You've lied to cover lies. It isn't like the stuff isn't archived. There are records of your lies and records of your lies uncovered. wrong Dave like Stevie you think disagreeing with you is lying No, I don't believe that disagreeing is lying. yes you do Lying is lying and you've done it time and again. yes I have so have you and so has Stevie You aren't credible. Why? I am as credible as Stevie or you. you lie you have lied within the past 24 hrs about my claims as to income Stevie has lied he has said I have aids, that I engage in unpropected sex, that I have admited to child mosting we are on the same footing There are archived posts which prove that you've lied. as their are for Stevie lots of them I have lied about my rank and that is all I have told some lies that have lead Stevie off on wild goose chases about my identity that is it Yes, you certainly have lied. agreed cut repating yourself get your stuff dumped how do these facts allow Stevie to claim someone has AIDS isn't lie about medical matters? Is Steve acting in a medical capacity here? that is one of the 2 issues for the BoN to decide I would say Yes, as soon as he claims he is making a PROFESSION opinion he is acting in medical capcity as soon as HE gives medical advice to people that KNOW he is an LPN is is as soon as he claims to have used the materail here to act professionaly he is the BoN will make its ruling and act accordingly If I am right Stevie will suffer some kind of scantion, he may lose his license if Stevie is right nothing will happen to him and no harm done how does that allow Stevie to LIE about the procedure of BoN so he can try to frighten someon into not reporting him? I've not noted Steve attempting to frighten "someon" into not reporting him. then you have not been reading I have observed his warnings to you on what is likely to take place after you've done so. and he is lying about it deal with reality Dave if you can Mark, I don't think you are in a position to tell others about reality. right you don't think but I knew that cut You've lied about your work. Were you ever in the Chemical Corps of the United States Army? yes cutting unsuported bs You've lied about your income. no i have not I have never stated my income you dolt Haven't you? no I have not therefore having never made such a statement I have never lie within such a statement So the way we can tell if you aren't lying is because you haven't said anything? not exactly but yuou can assume I making statments I have not made You've lied about your trained pool of typists. nope Sure you have, Mark. You told us that you have a trained pool of typists. You later said that you couldn't have one of 'em type something up because of the expense of paying her. never said that I siad I choose not to pay for the time not that I could not pay for it that is the problem you and Stevie take a statement, apply a host of assumetion and then claim I said what you think was implied in the first statement and run off from there You're a fabricator. when it serves to make me safer yes long ago admited There you have most of it. You also lie when it is convenient or when it suits you. not exactly by 7 yars of silence from the DoD I can legaly assume the assent of the DoD and the FBI to that How does one legally assume? by doing so How does one go about doing so? by doing so I reported myself to the FBI all those years ago If that isn't another of your lies, it is a start. Why not call 'em and report yourself again? why report myself again? esp as No rime was comitted Stevei greatly over simplifies anything when he tlaks about the law If no "rime" was "comitted", why'd you report yourself? What are you "tlaking" about? I discussed the matter as part of reporting stevies death threats why does everyting have to be repeated for you your ideas on sexual fun--you don't think those might lessen your credibility? the State of TN requires that I not recieve any discrimination based on my sexuality so yes I expect that Tennesse to obey its own rules Fine, Colonel. You can dress in full uniform and have a little game of beat me/spank me/pee on me. and None of the is legaly something the BoN may consider ...you "legally assume". Those things would seem to go toward establishing the credibility of an accuser. Do you think you'd be seen as credible? they seem might to , to you, but the law ,and the BoN say otherwise other than some kind of Illegal sex ( and I think all that is left in feild is sex with kidds, animals and corpses and rape in the legal sense of the word) the rest does not matter, legaly you are a prude, but the LAW does not allow you to enforce that on everyone else A prude, Mark? yes a prude. if you prefer another label put it forward with your reasons and I'll consider using it Do you think I'm part of some tiny minority which approves of your lifestyle? no grow up and get over it Dave I'm fully grown and nothing compels me to get over anything. you don't act fully grown, but you are right you don't have to get over anything but it is good advice I have a friend who is a licensed plumber. I'll be sure to tell him to watch his P's and Q's when posting here, lest you attempt to have his license revoked. if he lies about pumbing you can be sure I will One cannot be sure of anything with the likes of you. you and ESP Stevie should remember that I don't think either of us is likely to forget it. I do but more Stevie than yourself you don't know what I can or will do About the only things I can reasonably expect is that it won't be 1) reasonable, 2) rational or 3) truthful more BS Dave Indeed just for illustration if i happened to paranoid threat to myself and other Stevie has claimed to be "his professional opinion" (and if anything gets him besides mouthing to an investagtor those words wil be it) pushing proding trying to rerate someone like risk his own life and you would be risking your iF I were what Stevie says I am I don't believe you to be rational, If Stevie were corect in his Professional assement you should be. If I am nuts or irtaional of what have I am much more dangerous to you than If I am the rest of the paragraph cut off at the tangent .. you nor I can know very much about a person based on the degree on contact you have with me I know enough about you that I'd not want to hang out with you, work with you or have a series of QSOs about what interests you. ture enough and I can say the same of you of course cut Are you too lazy to do anything for yourself? No Then hop to it. to what? Write letters to the editor of your paper. why? ...to tell him that I've been mean to you. to what end? cut you do have such a rich fantasy life Dave Do you think I made up the part about reading a newspaper? having a nearby TV station? What part do you believe to be fantasy? that you state I should find either the proper venue to deal with you cut if you have Stevie has if Stevie has he will likely lose his licens or be oteherwise punished That doesn't track, Colonel. sure does I'm not Steve are you certain it is hard to tell some days . I made a diagnosis. See if you can have my license revoked or have me "oteherwise" punished. First I'll try to deal with Stevie he has a license to revoke you don't further becuase of his licnese he more dangerous to me in my judegment, futher still dealing with Stevie liecense which he uses to obtain criedbilty will alos lessen yours to say much the same thing Addtionaly I have a plan that I hope will deal Stevie a suitable punishment, I don't have such a plan w.r.t. you therefore logicaly I should continue to focous on Stevie and I will but you are fool if you I am going to take on everyone at once I cringe to think what that might mean. you should Stvie has ****ed me off enough and he is far greater danger from a medical practice issue than ANYONE in the NG Right. Lots of people get their medical information from some guy posting in an amateur radio newsgroup. some one that was talkingabout crufing me based on what he read in NG did get it from Stevie ...only Phil Kane has to be more careful and since he is an antonry not a paralegal... I'm sure that it will come as a great surprise to Phil to find that he is an antonry. ...(Stevie is the nursing version of a paralegal) he has greater latittude in giving professional LEGAL oppinions than Stevie has in Giving PROFESSIONAL nursing opinions Why have you chosen to write "professional LEGAL" and "PROFESSIONAL nursing"? It pleased me to do so I need NO other reason cut BTW why don't you stop your lying about addresing a Colonel Dave Oh, weren't you a Colonel in the U.S. Army Chemical Corps anymore? right said years ago I wasn;t a colonel, only YOU and stevie have been trying to continue that lie other the years You've accused me of lying in addressing you as "Colonel". You were the person who told us that you were a Colonel. That must have been *you* doing the lying. you contiue to lie after being told the truth further you have never had much reason to tell the lie I have admit to the lie Were you in the United States Army Chemical Corps? asked and answered yes Was that a bald-faced lie? Was your IQ of 248, higher than that of any other living person, also a lie? nope it was the result of test done many years ago ...and the test revealed that you have a higher IQ than the woman recognized as having the highest tested IQ? can't addrss you issue without more data Was your salary of 200-some thousand dollars a lie? never said my salery was 200K I said I turned a job that would paid 240K, and I did do that My mistake. no it was YOUR lie prhaps your claim about turning down "240k" has a built-in fudge factor I turned a job overing 240,000.00$ per year becuase I did not need the money badly enough to tkae the risk you assumed the rest You didn't say what the "k" was. Perhaps it was 240k dimes. that you choose to assume I did so becuase I was claiming to make that or more is not my fault You just lied Dave No, I asked you a question. no you lied in saying I lied about my income I have never stated my income in RRAP indeed if you are ever being truthfull yourself ain your claims you don't understand my writting you can't realy claim you know anything I say With your writing and your refusal to use spell checking, no one can know much of anything you are trying to say. then you agree meaning you are making statements based on materail you admt you don't understand, meaning you are lying when you claim I make any statement beyond a direct in context quote period As to the accusations of bigotry on my part, deal with it. I will of course You haven't demonstrated that you are able to do so. where? Anywhere. where are you using some specail definiation of "deal" i should know about There is no "specail definiation" but I think you should learn the commonly used definitions. I am dealing with you now I am always looking for something more effect but with you so far no dice Yoou two carries these chips on your shoulders thinking everyone around must confrom toyour expectations "Yoou two carries"? Phew! I've never asked for any special accommodations or revisions in regulations, standards or commonly accepted conduct in my life. neither have I I have asked for the same rights as everyone else. most esp the right to live my life in peace and safety without nosey pikers like yourself poking into what is none of your affiar You're a real non-confromist, Mark. ok I can live with that label, carries a few overtones of usages I don't like but it isn't bad the question is so what that I am (a nonconformist)? I view your sexual perversity as being immoral. what sexual perverity? Not perverity, Mark. Perversity. You know--yours. none here no prevesity at all Aren't you the same Mark Morgan who is into bisexual S&M stuff with a little urination and defecation thrown in for good measure? again what sexual perverity Again, not perverity, Mark. Perversity. Start with the ones I asked about above. what prevestity? nothing I consider preverse in your list at all one come under the heading of "not my kink" not nothing preverse in the list You by my starndard are the prevert I'm sure that you believe that. The world doesn't seem to operate on your "starnard". nor do I think it has to you OTOH think the world and everyone in MUST confrom to yours I've seen evidence of your frequent lying. really you see thing that don't exist then wow prehaps help is out there for you if you seek it There's the story of your life, Mark. nope perhaps yours from all apearances I don't have a history of lying, Mark. You do. you certainly do well documented indeed your history of lying is far better archived on RRAP than mine You're a pervert and everyone who isn't a pervert needs help. You can't write and won't use a spellchecke... and your and stevie whine and whine about it I complain about it. you whine about it Steve has complained about it. he whines about Others have complained about it. they whine about ti You tell all, "your probelm". not exactly since it is only your problem if you want to read my stuff, nobdoy is making you. Is someone making you? I keep asking and you keep ducking the question Killfle me that is your previeledge Thanks for illustrating my point. no it illustrates MINE ....r and it is the problem of everyone else. not everyones Dave only those that CHOOSE to try and read my stuff Isn't the point that you are attempting to communicate with others? other yes, not realy you or Stevie though, or Dee Flint My target is the lurker population out there you and the rest are idea and text to play and use to help me make my point to my target Would you have us believe that you don't care if others can't make sense of your writing ...... yes I have said so many times ....or that they find it laborious to decipher it? no but you asked the worng question I find it desirable that those that choose to read it find laborious to read Indeed my motive amusingly goes right to haert of a ProCode arguement "if you don't work it for you don't value it" therefore since being rough to read is easier path for me anyway by going with that flow I feel i reach a segement that is receptive the No Coder PoV and isn't geting it from the easier to read spokes people that my foes also find it hard to read I find yet an added Bonus you are showing signs of meglomania in claiming your veiwpoint is the only viewpoint Right, Mark. Nothing is right or wrong, good or bad. There are only shades of gray. exactly glad you agree or more precisely nothing is ALWAYS good or bad, even murder myhem, have their proper uses the problem with murder is not that it is never a good thing, it is that it is used in far too many cases where it is a bad thing You can't learn morse code ..... true enough .....and it is someone else's fault. never claimed that is another lie from you Dave Didn't you claim that attempting to learn morse was "torture"? yes I did, and it is for me but tis is not the same as saying my lack of skill is somebodies elses fault so your statement was and remains a lie Were you only torturing yourself? obviously I have never claimed that my lack of ability is ANYBODIES fault It the fault of others that Codes testing contues to be requiredbut that is another matter and you duck the point You tell numerous lies wrong Wrong? You admitted it above in the very same posting! no i don't I lie but i quuible on the details and begin to call numerous others "lier". I have caled 4 people liars (the Comode and the various slits are not proven to be people on their own so they don't count) and I have called on lies Would you like to adjust the number? no cut That you are (I infer from your action) a person that would do anything for money ( or something like that) and you assume everyone is like you (given the obvious differences betwen us assuming I would do anything the same way as you is REALY stupid Dave) is not my fault Nothing is ever your fault, Mark. Your comments do not read as those of a person with an IQ of 248. projecting again Dave How is it my fault that you have made a bad guess? you making incorrctly making assumetion beyond what I have said does not make me liar but when you make make statement of fact based on your incorect deduction it makes you the liar "you making incrrctly making assumetion"? Your frequent lies make you a liar, Mark. That's it in a nutshell. you failure to state the truth about what I have said makes YOU the liar that is it in nutshell You KNOW i am a non comfromist yet you insit that you appply your confist thinking to my way of life and deduce anything with any corelation to my views You've shrouded yourself in victimhood and you want a free ride in life. another lie on your part HF access in amateur radio? how does this question relate to your claim? You want a free ride in amateur radio. no I don't You want the regs changed to accommodate you. wrong again I want the regs changed to reflect what I see as the best interests of the ARS Judging by the fact NoCode is about to prevail It is about a lot more than my wants, and a fair number of people agree with me on what the regs should including it appears the people that make em how that is just about accomodating I frankly don't know Hf access is needed for life? I didn't write "for life", Mark. I wrote "in life". Remember, you're supposed to be the fellow the 248 IQ. The two terms are quite different. for life in life there is no difference her thier are in other context but I don't need HF in my or for my life I desire it yes I don't need it all how is taking part in the porcess of making the rules as provided for by law asking for a free ride in life? You demand that the standards for obtaining HF amateur radio access be lowered for *you*. no I don't I am taking part in the provided for system of seting what the rules should be for all as I Bill Sohl Brain, Carl, Len Todd, even you and Stevie ( jim and all the rest) Others should have to try to decipher your writing? you DON"T have to try to deipher my writing. I have never said you do. You choose to do so, if you don't like the rsults of your efforts make another CHOICE nonone is holding a gun to your head and forcing you is there? certainly not by my order, if you think someone is holding a gun to head and making you read my stuf call 911, i am certain (a rarity for me) that in this event and you call someone will help you. Why are you babbling about calling 911 and someone holding a gun to someone's head? you are babbling as if someone is making you read my posts Even Dee Flint while being an elist bitch about a lot of things does not contend she or anyone is being forced to read my stuff if it is too hard for don't it is your free choice unless there is gunman there or something like that Is the object of your posting here to communicate your thoughts to others? other yes you maybe, maybe not If it is, you aren't doing a very good job of it. maybe I am achiveing my goals maybe not that is for ME to judge One would think that you'd do all in your power to make your posts as well written and concise as possible. YOU think so, I disagree You don't do so. agreed as is my right cut Okay, I'm telling you that Steve didn't provide you the name, address and telephone number of his employer or of the employer's supervising organization. I refuse to be held to a different standard. Go to work. why should I work at getting you fired when I don't want you be fired? cut In Stevies case we may end up there and indeed the result may turn out to be Stevie losing his job but that is not in fact my true aim, it may be what happens but we shall see The result may be that you ending up with your ass in a crack. We shall see. Enough of that. Your current problem is to find out who and where my employer is. not my problem not my interest and not my goal Then you'll need to find out who to contact in order to point out that I've belittled and made fun of you. Be sure to tell them that I see you as a liar and a pervert. Let them know that I refuse to be politically correct in dealing with you. Good luck with your jihad. If were to try and get yuou fired Id talk about you not me there is plenty there in your past on here but of course I want you wroking LOTS of OVERTIME not fired Dave K8MN |
Tennessee Nurse: Steven J Robeson, LPN
an old friend wrote:
Dave Heil wrote: wrote: On Wed, 09 Nov 2005 05:17:15 GMT, Dave Heil wrote: cut How does your imprecision with words become my splitting of hairs? no imprecision with word occoured therefore of course that is not what became your spliting of hairs Based upon your two lines above, I rest my case. what case? Are you narcoleptic? no Do you recall my comments about your imprecision with words? You proved it above. See your terms "occoured" and "spliting". wrong again I simply proved I suffer from Dyslexia and what the doc termed Dyslexiod aphasia Interesting but it doesn't change what I wrote. You are imprecise with the written word. I used the terms pricisely You didn't even use the word "precisely" precisely. cut the LAW say the issues you claim are not important What issues did I claim are not important? you did not I did That isn't what you wrote. You are imprecise in the use of the written word. but the issues refer to are my sexuality and my alleged criminality both are legaly irrelevant in this matter That has yet to be determined. I think you are going to be surprised. no suprise indeed in making my report they will told of these "issues" since knowing the turth will be requiredin order to explain Stevie actions That'll be great. You don't believe that U.S. states generally follow the laws they have enacted? not always the US is better about it than most nation but I believe that the US is still imperfect, and liekly always will be to some extent. I also know that one of the areas in which the US most often shows its imperfections is in the treatement of those of its people that are "defferent" in some way Oh, you're "defferent" okay. Your past fabrications regarding your military service and lies on numerous other topics, what lies on other topics? C'mon, Mark! You've lied about any number of things here. You've lied about your military service and I don't mean just a single lie. You've lied to cover lies. It isn't like the stuff isn't archived. There are records of your lies and records of your lies uncovered. wrong Dave like Stevie you think disagreeing with you is lying No, I don't believe that disagreeing is lying. yes you do No, Mark, that is simply incorrect. In fact, I just told you so previously. Lying is lying and you've done it time and again. yes I have so have you and so has Stevie Keep in mind that you've just admitted to being a liar. Further down the post, you'll deny it. You aren't credible. Why? I am as credible as Stevie or you. No, Mark, you aren't. You have a number of issues. Lying is just one of them. you lie you have lied within the past 24 hrs about my claims as to income So you say. I admitted to being mistaken. Stevie has lied he has said I have aids, that I engage in unpropected sex, that I have admited to child mosting Did you admite to child mosting? we are on the same footing No, Mark, we assuredly are not. There are archived posts which prove that you've lied. as their are for Stevie lots of them You justify your lies by pointing to someone else? I have lied about my rank and that is all I have told some lies that have lead Stevie off on wild goose chases about my identity that is it Yes, you certainly have lied. agreed Keep in mind that you've agreed that you have lied. Further in the post, you deny it. cut repating yourself get your stuff dumped I don't need repating, Mark. I have a full head of hair. By the way, you don't really think my words are dumped when you cut them in a reply, do you? I checked and my original post is still there. All of my words are intact. how do these facts allow Stevie to claim someone has AIDS isn't lie about medical matters? Is Steve acting in a medical capacity here? that is one of the 2 issues for the BoN to decide Is it? I would say Yes, as soon as he claims he is making a PROFESSION opinion he is acting in medical capcity I've seen newsgroup posts where folks profess belief that a New World Order will result in global government, that the President and Vice- President planned the attacks on the World Trade Center and that someone has invented a miracle penis enlarger. I put no credence in any of them. as soon as HE gives medical advice to people that KNOW he is an LPN is is as soon as he claims to have used the materail here to act professionaly he is the BoN will make its ruling and act accordingly Maybe it will and maybe it'll write you off as a crackpot. If I am right Stevie will suffer some kind of scantion, he may lose his license Maybe he will and maybe he won't. if Stevie is right nothing will happen to him and no harm done I wouldn't bank on that. how does that allow Stevie to LIE about the procedure of BoN so he can try to frighten someon into not reporting him? I've not noted Steve attempting to frighten "someon" into not reporting him. then you have not been reading I have observed his warnings to you on what is likely to take place after you've done so. and he is lying about it I wouldn't bank on that either. deal with reality Dave if you can Mark, I don't think you are in a position to tell others about reality. right you don't think but I knew that That can't be right. You told me that you can't be absolutely sure of anything. cut You've lied about your work. Were you ever in the Chemical Corps of the United States Army? yes cutting unsuported bs You've lied about your income. no i have not I have never stated my income you dolt Haven't you? no I have not Okay, you've lied about your potential income. therefore having never made such a statement I have never lie within such a statement So the way we can tell if you aren't lying is because you haven't said anything? not exactly but yuou can assume I making statments I have not made We'll have to wait for the exact translation of that one. You've lied about your trained pool of typists. nope Sure you have, Mark. You told us that you have a trained pool of typists. You later said that you couldn't have one of 'em type something up because of the expense of paying her. never said that I siad I choose not to pay for the time not that I could not pay for it Read what I wrote. Please point to the portion where I wrote that you "could not pay for it". that is the problem you and Stevie take a statement, apply a host of assumetion and then claim I said what you think was implied in the first statement and run off from there No, that isn't the problem. You responded to what I wrote and said I'd written something I hadn't written. You're a fabricator. when it serves to make me safer yes long ago admited Remember that you wrote that. Further along in the post, you'll deny it. There you have most of it. You also lie when it is convenient or when it suits you. not exactly You're waffling now, Mark. by 7 yars of silence from the DoD I can legaly assume the assent of the DoD and the FBI to that How does one legally assume? by doing so How does one go about doing so? by doing so That's a circular response. I'd expect better of an individual with an IQ of 248. I reported myself to the FBI all those years ago If that isn't another of your lies, it is a start. Why not call 'em and report yourself again? why report myself again? esp as No rime was comitted Stevei greatly over simplifies anything when he tlaks about the law If no "rime" was "comitted", why'd you report yourself? What are you "tlaking" about? I discussed the matter as part of reporting stevies death threats I see. You told the FBI that you'd reported yourself to the FBI? why does everyting have to be repeated for you ....because the answers keep moving in a veritable carousel of untruth. your ideas on sexual fun--you don't think those might lessen your credibility? the State of TN requires that I not recieve any discrimination based on my sexuality so yes I expect that Tennesse to obey its own rules Fine, Colonel. You can dress in full uniform and have a little game of beat me/spank me/pee on me. and None of the is legaly something the BoN may consider ...you "legally assume". Those things would seem to go toward establishing the credibility of an accuser. Do you think you'd be seen as credible? they seem might to , to you, but the law ,and the BoN say otherwise You'd have to show that the law and the Tennessee Board of Nursing say otherwise. I'm afraid I can't accept your word. other than some kind of Illegal sex ( and I think all that is left in feild is sex with kidds, animals and corpses and rape in the legal sense of the word) the rest does not matter, legaly ....and the other kinds don't matter to you morally? you are a prude, but the LAW does not allow you to enforce that on everyone else A prude, Mark? yes a prude. if you prefer another label put it forward with your reasons and I'll consider using it Do you think I'm part of some tiny minority which approves of your lifestyle? no Then if your sexual practices fall outside what society finds "acceptable", I'm no prude. grow up and get over it Dave I'm fully grown and nothing compels me to get over anything. you don't act fully grown, but you are right you don't have to get over anything but it is good advice If you were the very last guy left in this newsgroup, I'd not be taking advice from you. you don't know what I can or will do About the only things I can reasonably expect is that it won't be 1) reasonable, 2) rational or 3) truthful more BS Dave Not at all, Mark. It is gospel. Base upon reading your material here and elsewhere, those are the things I expect. Indeed just for illustration if i happened to paranoid threat to myself and other Stevie has claimed to be "his professional opinion" (and if anything gets him besides mouthing to an investagtor those words wil be it) pushing proding trying to rerate someone like risk his own life and you would be risking your iF I were what Stevie says I am I don't believe you to be rational, If Stevie were corect in his Professional assement you should be. Are you now telling me that I should be afraid of you? If I am nuts or irtaional of what have I am much more dangerous to you than If I am Are you now telling me that I should be afraid of you? the rest of the paragraph cut off at the tangent . You cut yourself off before writing the tangent? you nor I can know very much about a person based on the degree on contact you have with me I know enough about you that I'd not want to hang out with you, work with you or have a series of QSOs about what interests you. ture enough and I can say the same of you of course cut Are you too lazy to do anything for yourself? No Then hop to it. to what? Write letters to the editor of your paper. why? ...to tell him that I've been mean to you. to what end? ....both ends. cut you do have such a rich fantasy life Dave Do you think I made up the part about reading a newspaper? having a nearby TV station? What part do you believe to be fantasy? that you state I should find either the proper venue to deal with you cut Why'd you cut your words before you completed the thought? Either the proper venue to deal with me or what? if you have Stevie has if Stevie has he will likely lose his licens or be oteherwise punished That doesn't track, Colonel. sure does I'm not Steve are you certain it is hard to tell some days I'm sure that's the case for you. If it will help you, I sign my posts "Dave K8MN". . I made a diagnosis. See if you can have my license revoked or have me "oteherwise" punished. First I'll try to deal with Stevie he has a license to revoke you don't ....that you know of. Hey! I have an amateur radio license. Why not see if you can get it revoked. further becuase of his licnese he more dangerous to me in my judegment, You have a record of finding people to be dangerous to you. futher still dealing with Stevie liecense which he uses to obtain criedbilty will alos lessen yours to say much the same thing That's some faulty logic you've got there, Mark. Addtionaly I have a plan that I hope will deal Stevie a suitable punishment, I don't have such a plan w.r.t. you It is probably wise of you not to have formulated such a plan. therefore logicaly I should continue to focous on Stevie and I will There's not much evidence of focus on your part. but you are fool if you I am going to take on everyone at once I cringe to think what that might mean. you should Why? Is the reality worse than I can imagine? Stvie has ****ed me off enough and he is far greater danger from a medical practice issue than ANYONE in the NG Right. Lots of people get their medical information from some guy posting in an amateur radio newsgroup. some one that was talkingabout crufing me based on what he read in NG did get it from Stevie Crufing you? I'll bet that hurts. BTW why don't you stop your lying about addresing a Colonel Dave Oh, weren't you a Colonel in the U.S. Army Chemical Corps anymore? right said years ago I wasn;t a colonel, only YOU and stevie have been trying to continue that lie other the years You've accused me of lying in addressing you as "Colonel". You were the person who told us that you were a Colonel. That must have been *you* doing the lying. you contiue to lie after being told the truth With you, no one can be sure of when you tell the truth and when you lie. It appears that you lie until you are caught at it. Afterward, you may come clean or you may tell another lie to cover the original lie. further you have never had much reason to tell the lie Get it straight, Colonel. I didn't tell the lie. You did. I have admit to the lie Yep, to that one. Were you in the United States Army Chemical Corps? asked and answered yes How can I believe you? Was that a bald-faced lie? Was your IQ of 248, higher than that of any other living person, also a lie? nope it was the result of test done many years ago ...and the test revealed that you have a higher IQ than the woman recognized as having the highest tested IQ? can't addrss you issue without more data You can't address the issue? Did anyone ever tell you that you had the highest tested IQ on the planet? Perhaps you need a little more time to polish the follow up lie. Here's some data for you ( from http://www.audiblox.com/iq_scores.htm ) IQ Description % of Population 130+ Very Superior 2.2 120-129 Superior 6.7 110-119 High Average 16.1 90-109 Average 50 80-89 Low Average 16.1 70-79 Borderline 6.7 Below 70 Extremely Low 2.2 from: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marilyn_vos_Savant "Marilyn vos Savant (born August 11, 1946) is an American magazine columnist, author, lecturer, and playwright who rose to fame through her listing in the Guinness Book of World Records under "Highest IQ". Since 1986 she has written Ask Marilyn, a Sunday column in Parade magazine in which she answers questions from readers on a variety of subjects..." "...Her Stanford-Binet score is discussed in a 1989 New York magazine article by Julie Baumgold (Baumgold 1989). Marilyn took the Stanford-Binet when she was ten years old; this was the Second Edition of the test, published in 1937. The Stanford-Binet at that time yielded ratio IQs: scores obtained by dividing mental age (as assessed by the test) by chronological age, and multiplying by 100. Marilyn says she first took the test in September 1956, at the age of 10 years and 0 months, and achieved the ceiling mental age of 22 years and 10 months, yielding an IQ of 228. This was the score listed by Guinness, this is the score she gives in interviews, and this is the score shown in the "About the Author" section of her books. Rounding it up produces the value of 230 which sometimes appears." "The figure of 167+ comes from a school record cited by Baumgold indicating that Marilyn took the Stanford-Binet in March 1957, at the age of 10 years and 8 months, and achieved a mental age of "17-10+" (meaning at least 17 years and 10 months). It is unclear how the recorded chronological age was derived; dates in March are 6 or 7 months from her August birthday, not 8. It is also unclear how this record relates to the account given in the previous paragraph. The Stanford-Binet at that time had two forms (Form L and Form M), so one possibility is that Marilyn took the test twice." "The figure of 218 was derived by psychometrician Ronald K. Hoeflin, using a chronological age of 10 years and 6 months, and a mental age of 22 years and 11 months. This figure seems to have no obvious rationale. The ceiling of the Second Edition of the Stanford-Binet was 22 years and 10 months, not 11 months (Terman 1937), and a chronological age of 10 years and 6 months corresponds neither to the age in Marilyn's account nor to the age in the school record cited by Baumgold (although it could fit a March test date)." "The second intelligence test mentioned by Guinness is the Mega Test, designed by Hoeflin and taken by Marilyn as an adult in the mid-1980s. The Mega Test yields deviation IQs: scores obtained by multiplying the testee's z-score (the rarity of their raw score on the test) by a constant standard deviation (in this case 16) and then adding 100. Marilyn's raw score was 46 out of 48, corresponding in the latest norming of the test to a z-score of 5.4 and therefore an IQ of 186, a percentile of 99.999997, and a rarity of 1 in 30,000,000 (Hoeflin 1989)." Now, is there anything you'd care to clarify about your claimed IQ? Was your salary of 200-some thousand dollars a lie? never said my salery was 200K I said I turned a job that would paid 240K, and I did do that My mistake. no it was YOUR lie NO, Mark, it was my mistake. I confused your supposed job offer with the claim of actual employment. prhaps your claim about turning down "240k" has a built-in fudge factor I turned a job overing 240,000.00$ per year becuase I did not need the money badly enough to tkae the risk Sure you did, Mark. you assumed the rest Sometimes you just have to tkae the risk. indeed if you are ever being truthfull yourself ain your claims you don't understand my writting you can't realy claim you know anything I say With your writing and your refusal to use spell checking, no one can know much of anything you are trying to say. then you agree If you think I've agreed, then your reading is as bad as your writing. meaning you are making statements based on materail you admt you don't understand, meaning you are lying when you claim I make any statement beyond a direct in context quote period As to the accusations of bigotry on my part, deal with it. I will of course You haven't demonstrated that you are able to do so. where? Anywhere. where It has been answered, Mark. Yoou two carries these chips on your shoulders thinking everyone around must confrom toyour expectations "Yoou two carries"? Phew! I've never asked for any special accommodations or revisions in regulations, standards or commonly accepted conduct in my life. neither have I Yes, you have, Mark. I have asked for the same rights as everyone else. most esp the right to live my life in peace and safety without nosey pikers like yourself poking into what is none of your affiar Are you posting to a public newsgroup? Have you posted to public newsgroups catering to those with peculiar sexual desires? Would a man who demands a "right to live my life in peace and safety without nosey pikers like yourself poking into what is none of your affiar (sic), be doing so? You're a real non-confromist, Mark. ok I can live with that label, carries a few overtones of usages I don't like but it isn't bad When spelled your way, it carries more than a few. the question is so what that I am (a nonconformist)? Oh, now you want to be a non-conformist! I view your sexual perversity as being immoral. what sexual perverity? Not perverity, Mark. Perversity. You know--yours. none here no prevesity at all Not "prevesity", Mark. Perversity. Aren't you the same Mark Morgan who is into bisexual S&M stuff with a little urination and defecation thrown in for good measure? again what sexual perverity Again, not perverity, Mark. Perversity. Start with the ones I asked about above. what prevestity? No, not "prevestity", Mark. I wrote about your perversity. nothing I consider preverse in your list at all one come under the heading of "not my kink" not nothing preverse in the list Perverse, Mark, not "preverse" and I'm not talking of your standards, I mean societal standards. You by my starndard are the prevert I'm sure that you believe that. The world doesn't seem to operate on your "starnard". nor do I think it has to Lucky for the world. you OTOH think the world and everyone in MUST confrom to yours Society says that there are things which you can and can't do. There are things you can and can't say. I've seen evidence of your frequent lying. really you see thing that don't exist then wow prehaps help is out there for you if you seek it There's the story of your life, Mark. nope perhaps yours from all apearances I don't have a history of lying, Mark. You do. you certainly do well documented That is yet another falsehood on your part. indeed your history of lying is far better archived on RRAP than mine Mark, you're making one fabrication after another. You tell all, "your probelm". not exactly since it is only your problem if you want to read my stuff, nobdoy is making you. Is Mister Nobdoy in charge of newsgroup enforcement? Is someone making you? Perhaps Mister Nobdoy compels you to read my posts. I keep asking and you keep ducking the question To paraphrase you: I owe you no response. Killfle me that is your previeledge Thanks for illustrating my point. no it illustrates MINE Your point is that you can't write clearly? ....r and it is the problem of everyone else. not everyones Dave only those that CHOOSE to try and read my stuff Isn't the point that you are attempting to communicate with others? other yes, not realy you or Stevie though, or Dee Flint My target is the lurker population out there ....and the lurkers will be able to read and comprehend your gibberish, but no one else can. How can I compete with logic such as that? you and the rest are idea and text to play and use to help me make my point to my target The rest of us are idea and text and you believe you are making a point to a target? There's more of that 248 IQ at work. Would you have us believe that you don't care if others can't make sense of your writing ...... yes I have said so many times So now you don't care about your target audience? ....or that they find it laborious to decipher it? no but you asked the worng question I find it desirable that those that choose to read it find laborious to read So the target audience isn't supposed to read your posts but they'll understand you anyway? Hmmmm. Indeed my motive amusingly goes right to haert of a ProCode arguement "if you don't work it for you don't value it" That's some amusement. You come off like an idiot because you don't work at writing and that's supposed to hit the PCTA right in the breadbasket, huh? therefore since being rough to read is easier path for me anyway by going with that flow I feel i reach a segement that is receptive the No Coder PoV and isn't geting it from the easier to read spokes people Tell you what Mark, that has to be one of the dumbest statements I've ever read from anyone. that my foes also find it hard to read I find yet an added Bonus Pretty slick, Mark, and you've told us you don't care if your target reads your stuff. So, the only person who is supposed to read your stuff is....you? you are showing signs of meglomania in claiming your veiwpoint is the only viewpoint Right, Mark. Nothing is right or wrong, good or bad. There are only shades of gray. exactly glad you agree or more precisely nothing is ALWAYS good or bad, even murder myhem, have their proper uses the problem with murder is not that it is never a good thing, it is that it is used in far too many cases where it is a bad thing Oh, I'm not agreeing with you, Mark, just the opposite. I firmly believe that murder is not a gray area. The one point I'll concede is on the topic of your hem. Both above the knee and below the knee are "in" this fall. You tell numerous lies wrong Wrong? You admitted it above in the very same posting! no i don't I lie but i quuible on the details You may now refer to the portions above where you admitted directly to lying. Dave K8MN |
More Markie Mularkie
nobodys old friend wrote:
Dave Heil wrote: Do you recall my comments about your imprecision with words? You proved it above. See your terms "occoured" and "spliting". wrong again I simply proved I suffer from Dyslexia and what the doc termed Dyslexiod aphasia I used the terms pricisely No, you did not. You were IMPRECISE in your use of the words. Your TYPING errors come from laziness and haste, NOT dyslexia. There is NO SUCH THING as "dyslexiod aphasia". "WebMD", Tabor's and the Stedman's Guide all concur. More than likely your MD told you one thing and you were too embarrassed to admit you didn't understand so just made up something that sounds like what he told you. I think you are going to be surprised. no suprise indeed in making my report they will told of these "issues" since knowing the turth will be requiredin order to explain Stevie actions And you continue to function as though you understand the BoN rules. You quite clearly do not, but good luck anyway. I continue to add your "pearls" to the CD. It will make interesting reading in Nashville if I am tasked to respond to a "complaint". No, I don't believe that disagreeing is lying. yes you do Lying is lying and you've done it time and again. yes I have so have you and so has Stevie No, Dave and I have not. You aren't credible. Why? I am as credible as Stevie or you. No, you're not. you lie you have lied within the past 24 hrs about my claims as to income Stevie has lied he has said I have aids, that I engage in unpropected sex, that I have admited to child mosting But MARKIE, YOU are the one that said it's "OK" to just use ANY "definition" of ANY word as you see fit without ensuring that all parties of the discussion agree on WHICH definition is being used. That's part of the CD too. Remember all your arguments on the use of the term "drafted"...?!?! You INSISTED that YOUR definition was not the one used by the DoD, yet it IS a military application we were addressing... It's part of the record, Markie. Good luck squeezing out from under that one. we are on the same footing Nooooooooooooooooooo...we're not. Dave and I are professionals, recognized by our peers in our seperate disciplines as such. Any "defense" I have to mount will include testimony of people who are also known and recognized within my profession. None of them are allegedly dyslexic gay pagan Colonels in the "Chemical Corps" who can't manage to use a spellchecker in their correspondences and "admit" that they consider lying to be a "right" or moral responsibility to teach their children. There are archived posts which prove that you've lied. as their are for Stevie lots of them See, Markie...There you go with that "disagreeing is lying" thing...You seem to think it ony applies to others...And therein lies part of your downfall. I have lied about my rank and that is all I have told some lies that have lead Stevie off on wild goose chases about my identity that is it Yes, you certainly have lied. agreed cut repating yourself get your stuff dumped But not before you publically acknowledged, again, your propensity for lying. Thanks. If I am right Stevie will suffer some kind of scantion, he may lose his license if Stevie is right nothing will happen to him and no harm done "Stevie" is right, but there WILL be "harm done"...to the person filing a malicious complaint... how does that allow Stevie to LIE about the procedure of BoN so he can try to frighten someon into not reporting him? I've not noted Steve attempting to frighten "someon" into not reporting him. then you have not been reading I have observed his warnings to you on what is likely to take place after you've done so. and he is lying about it There's no lying here by me. I am telling you straight up...I am not taking a slapping by you at the Board of Nursing and then just letting you get away with it. The nature of your maliciousness is established here. Thanks. You've lied about your trained pool of typists. nope Sure you have, Mark. You told us that you have a trained pool of typists. You later said that you couldn't have one of 'em type something up because of the expense of paying her. never said that Damn, Mark...caught lying again... I siad I choose not to pay for the time not that I could not pay for it Nope. That's NOT what you said. that is the problem you and Stevie take a statement, apply a host of assumetion and then claim I said what you think was implied in the first statement and run off from there No, we take a statement from you that says "I can't afford to pay right now" and take it at face value that you can't afford to pay. There's no shame in not having some discretionary cash on hand, Markie...It happens all the time... I reported myself to the FBI all those years ago If that isn't another of your lies, it is a start. Why not call 'em and report yourself again? why report myself again? esp as No rime was comitted Stevei greatly over simplifies anything when he tlaks about the law If no "rime" was "comitted", why'd you report yourself? What are you "tlaking" about? I discussed the matter as part of reporting stevies death threats why does everyting have to be repeated for you So we can document you in yet ANOTHER of your twists of the tale, Markie! I don't believe you to be rational, If Stevie were corect in his Professional assement you should be. As usual, Markie, tripped yourself up. If I am nuts or irtaional of what have I am much more dangerous to you than If I am Was that a sentence? What did you say? the rest of the paragraph cut off at the tangent Only reality and rationality are not "tangental" to you, Markie. See if you can have my license revoked or have me "oteherwise" punished. First I'll try to deal with Stevie he has a license to revoke you don't further becuase of his licnese he more dangerous to me in my judegment, You can't even spell "judgement" let alone express a valid opinion. Addtionaly I have a plan that I hope will deal Stevie a suitable punishment, I don't have such a plan w.r.t. you Ahhhhhhhhhhhhhhh....PUNISHMENT! That's what Markie wants! therefore logicaly I should continue to focous on Stevie and I will Evidence of STALKING, Markie! Thanks! Right. Lots of people get their medical information from some guy posting in an amateur radio newsgroup. some one that was talkingabout crufing me based on what he read in NG did get it from Stevie "crufing" you...?!?! WTF is "crufing"...?!?! You've accused me of lying in addressing you as "Colonel". You were the person who told us that you were a Colonel. That must have been *you* doing the lying. you contiue to lie after being told the truth further you have never had much reason to tell the lie He never HAS told a lie that I am aware of... YOU, on the other hand, have. I have admit to the lie Were you in the United States Army Chemical Corps? asked and answered yes Asked and lied about. Was that a bald-faced lie? Was your IQ of 248, higher than that of any other living person, also a lie? nope it was the result of test done many years ago ...and the test revealed that you have a higher IQ than the woman recognized as having the highest tested IQ? can't addrss you issue without more data What you MEAN is that you made up a number, however there's REAL evidence that YOUR number is so ludicrous as to simply prove that you've been caught AGAIN! indeed if you are ever being truthfull yourself ain your claims you don't understand my writting you can't realy claim you know anything I say With your writing and your refusal to use spell checking, no one can know much of anything you are trying to say. then you agree meaning you are making statements based on materail you admt you don't understand, meaning you are lying when you claim I make any statement beyond a direct in context quote period Which IS to say that you are ATTEMPTING to be deceitful in order to create an enviroment of distrust and miscommunication... Which is to say you are willfully lying. Yoou two carries these chips on your shoulders thinking everyone around must confrom toyour expectations "Yoou two carries"? Phew! I've never asked for any special accommodations or revisions in regulations, standards or commonly accepted conduct in my life. neither have I An ABSOLUTE LIE! And one perpetrated in this NG over and over...God knows what you're like in "real" life...! ! ! ! I have asked for the same rights as everyone else. most esp the right to live my life in peace and safety without nosey pikers like yourself poking into what is none of your affiar Then why MAKE it anyone's affair by airing your dirty underwear in here? Aren't you the same Mark Morgan who is into bisexual S&M stuff with a little urination and defecation thrown in for good measure? again what sexual perverity Again, not perverity, Mark. Perversity. Start with the ones I asked about above. what prevestity? "prevestity" is not a word. nothing I consider preverse in your list at all one come under the heading of "not my kink" not nothing preverse in the list "preverse"...Before the verse? I don't have a history of lying, Mark. You do. you certainly do well documented indeed your history of lying is far better archived on RRAP than mine BBBWWWWHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH AHAHA HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA HAHAHA HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA HAHAHAHA HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA HAHAHA COUGHCOUGHSNORTSNORT BBBWWWHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA HAHAHA HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA HAHAHA HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA HAHAHAHA ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! You're a pervert and everyone who isn't a pervert needs help. You can't write and won't use a spellchecke... and your and stevie whine and whine about it I complain about it. you whine about it Everybody's a whiner except Markie. Steve has complained about it. he whines about Everybody's a whiner except Markie. Others have complained about it. they whine about ti See! What did I tell you! Everybody's a whiner except Markie! You tell all, "your probelm". not exactly since it is only your problem if you want to read my stuff, nobdoy is making you. Is someone making you? You are, when you spam the NG with it. I keep asking and you keep ducking the question Killfle me that is your previeledge Thanks for illustrating my point. no it illustrates MINE No, it doesn't. ....r and it is the problem of everyone else. not everyones Dave only those that CHOOSE to try and read my stuff Isn't the point that you are attempting to communicate with others? other yes, not realy you or Stevie though, or Dee Flint In other words, anyone who disagrees with you. My target is the lurker population out there I am sure that they are just DYING to know what Mark Morgan thinks! (...visions of people leaning over, cupping their ear as in the "E.F. Hutton" commercials...) Indeed my motive amusingly goes right to haert of a ProCode arguement "if you don't work it for you don't value it" Huh? I have caled 4 people liars (the Comode and the various slits are not proven to be people on their own so they don't count) and I have called on lies Would you like to adjust the number? no You should. I came up with twelve off the top of my head, and that was without doing any "Googling"..... You want the regs changed to accommodate you. wrong again I want the regs changed to reflect what I see as the best interests of the ARS No...You want the rules changed to accomodate you. Judging by the fact NoCode is about to prevail It is about a lot more than my wants, and a fair number of people agree with me on what the regs should including it appears the people that make em A fair numbr of people agree with you taht they don't want to have to actually do something to get something...That's been the trend since the 60's...thanks Abbie Hoffman, Timothy Leary, etc etc etc... I didn't write "for life", Mark. I wrote "in life". Remember, you're supposed to be the fellow the 248 IQ. The two terms are quite different. for life in life there is no difference her thier are in other context There is absolutely EVERY difference in the context! but I don't need HF in my or for my life Obvioulsy that's not true. You've been spanking that monkey in here for years. Even Dee Flint while being an elist bitch about a lot of things does not contend she or anyone is being forced to read my stuff WHOA! You go on and on about "disagreeing is not lying", etc, and you call a WOMAN who has NEVER used such language about you a BITCH...?!?! You need to get knocked off your feet for that one, Markie! And I mean a solid, blood letting smack in the middle of your greasy face! Considering she ALSO lives in Michigan, and there may very well be a MR Flint, I'd think that an APOLOGY for the poor choice of adjectives might be in order! Okay, I'm telling you that Steve didn't provide you the name, address and telephone number of his employer or of the employer's supervising organization. I refuse to be held to a different standard. Go to work. why should I work at getting you fired when I don't want you be fired? Trust me, Markie...I am the one you don't want fired! In Stevies case we may end up there and indeed the result may turn out to be Stevie losing his job but that is not in fact my true aim, it may be what happens but we shall see The result may be that you ending up with your ### in a crack. We shall see. Enough of that. Your current problem is to find out who and where my employer is. not my problem not my interest and not my goal Yes, having YOUR ### in a crack is a problem. Then you'll need to find out who to contact in order to point out that I've belittled and made fun of you. Be sure to tell them that I see you as a liar and a pervert. Let them know that I refuse to be politically correct in dealing with you. Good luck with your jihad. If were to try and get yuou fired Id talk about you not me there is plenty there in your past on here but of course I want you wroking LOTS of OVERTIME not fired "wroking"...?!?! Steve, K4YZ |
More Brain and Markie Stretching
K4YZ wrote: wrote: wrote: On 6 Nov 2005 08:11:37 -0800, wrote: Yep, he even used "professional" to describe that he wasn't just some yahoo, but a medical professional. and i hope that is what is going to nail with the nursing board Nothing you or me say is going to sway the nurses board. Unintentional, I am sure, but finally a modicum of sanity displayed by one of the Feeble Five. Steve, somehow I don't think my Somalia logbooks will be much of a concern to your board, or whether or not I read a 1958 copy of "This is the Air Force," or if you were really an "A" NCOIC of Okinawa MARS. I'm going to guess that it's your behavior that they'll be looking at. You may be able to prove that Mark misspells words and doesn't finish his thoughts when writing to the group. You may be able to prove that Mark's faith isn't mainstream, or that he is gay or bi or whatever. You might even be able to prove that he thinks that you're an asshole like I do. But if you stepped out of bounds and used your Nurse credentials to use another states health or child services professionals, or police or Sheriff personnel to harass Mark, then that's what they'll probably be considering. So at the end of the day, if you did "dial" Illinois, you'll have some real explaining to do. Somehow I don't think my Somalia logbooks will be much of a concern to your board, but you might think differently. Good luck. |
Tennessee Nurse: Steven J Robeson, LPN
Dave Heil wrote: an old friend wrote: Dave Heil wrote: wrote: On Wed, 09 Nov 2005 05:17:15 GMT, Dave Heil wrote: cut cut with words? You proved it above. See your terms "occoured" and "spliting". wrong again I simply proved I suffer from Dyslexia and what the doc termed Dyslexiod aphasia Interesting but it doesn't change what I wrote. You are imprecise with the written word. then so what if that is what you mean bashing for my disablity is not noble behavoir Dave, nor something that will make me inclined to do as you wish cuting davei spliting hair again but the issues refer to are my sexuality and my alleged criminality both are legaly irrelevant in this matter That has yet to be determined. not as I see it the history of the law on this subject is clear cut You don't believe that U.S. states generally follow the laws they have enacted? not always the US is better about it than most nation but I believe that the US is still imperfect, and liekly always will be to some extent. I also know that one of the areas in which the US most often shows its imperfections is in the treatement of those of its people that are "defferent" in some way Oh, you're "defferent" okay. yes I am, get over it, you will be happier that way cut No, I don't believe that disagreeing is lying. yes you do No, Mark, that is simply incorrect. In fact, I just told you so previously. Lying is lying and you've done it time and again. yes I have so have you and so has Stevie Keep in mind that you've just admitted to being a liar. Further down the post, you'll deny it. and you have been labeled a liar asnwered the coment and not denied being liar You aren't credible. Why? I am as credible as Stevie or you. No, Mark, you aren't. why not? You have a number of issues. such as? Lying is just one of them. you lie you have lied within the past 24 hrs about my claims as to income So you say. I admitted to being mistaken. and you have falsely tried to blame me for your mistake Stevie has lied he has said I have aids, that I engage in unpropected sex, that I have admited to child mosting Did you admite to child mosting? no we are on the same footing No, Mark, we assuredly are not. why not? Stevie lies about people, falsely accuses them of crimes, lies about things he has NO way of knowing There are archived posts which prove that you've lied. as their are for Stevie lots of them You justify your lies by pointing to someone else? no i don't my lies need no defense, since they have harmed no one. "No harm no foul" is how Lawyers are taught to think when looking at Torts and to consider this issue in all legal matters Stevie lies to attack and harm others, I do not cut repating yourself get your stuff dumped I don't need repating, Mark. I have a full head of hair. By the way, you don't really think my words are dumped when you cut them in a reply, do you? cut if you want to be stupid I will not bother with more of your post if you don't to repaet yourself then don't I don't care wether you you have any hair lots of it or hairy plams but you are being stupid to suggest I think cuting your word means I removeing your post it is as dumb as Stevies claim that when I cut and not bother with some of his word I am censoring him and for that stupid remark the rest of the post is flushed unread |
More Markie Mularkie
K4YZ wrote: nobodys old friend wrote: Dave Heil wrote: Do you recall my comments about your imprecision with words? You proved it above. See your terms "occoured" and "spliting". wrong again I simply proved I suffer from Dyslexia and what the doc termed Dyslexiod aphasia I used the terms pricisely No, you did not. You were IMPRECISE in your use of the words. Your TYPING errors come from laziness and haste, NOT dyslexia. precticing med without a license so flushing the rest |
More Markie Mularkie
"K4YZ" wrote in message oups.com... nobodys old friend wrote: Dave Heil wrote: [snip] I didn't write "for life", Mark. I wrote "in life". Remember, you're supposed to be the fellow the 248 IQ. The two terms are quite different. for life in life there is no difference her thier are in other context There is absolutely EVERY difference in the context! but I don't need HF in my or for my life Obvioulsy that's not true. You've been spanking that monkey in here for years. Even Dee Flint while being an elist bitch about a lot of things does not contend she or anyone is being forced to read my stuff WHOA! You go on and on about "disagreeing is not lying", etc, and you call a WOMAN who has NEVER used such language about you a BITCH...?!?! A little late there to protest, Steve. He started that several weeks ago. I simply choose to shun such people. You need to get knocked off your feet for that one, Markie! And I mean a solid, blood letting smack in the middle of your greasy face! He isn't worth the bother. Considering she ALSO lives in Michigan, and there may very well be a MR Flint, I'd think that an APOLOGY for the poor choice of adjectives might be in order! While there does happen to be a Mr. Flint, I would never permit him to risk problems for himself over someone like this. Dee D. Flint, N8UZE |
More Markie Mularkie
Dee Flint wrote: "K4YZ" wrote in message oups.com... nobodys old friend wrote: Dave Heil wrote: [snip] I didn't write "for life", Mark. I wrote "in life". Remember, you're supposed to be the fellow the 248 IQ. The two terms are quite different. for life in life there is no difference her thier are in other context There is absolutely EVERY difference in the context! but I don't need HF in my or for my life Obvioulsy that's not true. You've been spanking that monkey in here for years. Even Dee Flint while being an elist bitch about a lot of things does not contend she or anyone is being forced to read my stuff WHOA! You go on and on about "disagreeing is not lying", etc, and you call a WOMAN who has NEVER used such language about you a BITCH...?!?! A little late there to protest, Steve. He started that several weeks ago. I simply choose to shun such people. An apology of my own then, Dee, but as I am sure it's apparent by the ebb and flow of traffic, I've been busy lately and just plain missed it...However his conduct was wrong then, it's wrong today. You need to get knocked off your feet for that one, Markie! And I mean a solid, blood letting smack in the middle of your greasy face! He isn't worth the bother. Hear hear. Considering she ALSO lives in Michigan, and there may very well be a MR Flint, I'd think that an APOLOGY for the poor choice of adjectives might be in order! While there does happen to be a Mr. Flint, I would never permit him to risk problems for himself over someone like this. Bravo, Dee...However I doubt that there is a court in the United States that would fault a man for blooding the nose of a creep who defiled his spouse. Similar case occured in Chattanooga a couple years back..."Case Dismissed" for lack of evidence. 73 Steve, K4YZ |
More Markie Mularkie
"K4YZ" wrote in message oups.com... Dee Flint wrote: "K4YZ" wrote in message oups.com... nobodys old friend wrote: Dave Heil wrote: [snip] I didn't write "for life", Mark. I wrote "in life". Remember, you're supposed to be the fellow the 248 IQ. The two terms are quite different. for life in life there is no difference her thier are in other context There is absolutely EVERY difference in the context! but I don't need HF in my or for my life Obvioulsy that's not true. You've been spanking that monkey in here for years. Even Dee Flint while being an elist bitch about a lot of things does not contend she or anyone is being forced to read my stuff WHOA! You go on and on about "disagreeing is not lying", etc, and you call a WOMAN who has NEVER used such language about you a BITCH...?!?! A little late there to protest, Steve. He started that several weeks ago. I simply choose to shun such people. An apology of my own then, Dee, but as I am sure it's apparent by the ebb and flow of traffic, I've been busy lately and just plain missed it...However his conduct was wrong then, it's wrong today. Yeah I noticed your appearances have been irregular. And I agree that is conduct is wrong. However, I absolutely refuse to feed his ego and so take very little notice of his remarks. Here's an irony for you. He considers Extras to be elitists but is planning to become one himself as soon as possible after the code testing is dropped! Dee D. Flint, N8UZE |
More Markie Mularkie
Dee Flint wrote: "K4YZ" wrote in message oups.com... cut Here's an irony for you. He considers Extras to be elitists but is planning to become one himself as soon as possible after the code testing is dropped! now alsas you cross the line into Lair or perhaps it is ego manaic I never said extras are elitists I said you are I have said other hams that happen to extras are but you personalize a coment about yourself to mean what it does not say Dee D. Flint, N8UZE |
More Markie Mularkie
K4YZ wrote: Dee Flint wrote: "K4YZ" wrote in message oups.com... nobodys old friend wrote: Dave Heil wrote: cut A little late there to protest, Steve. He started that several weeks ago. I simply choose to shun such people. An apology of my own then, Dee, but as I am sure it's apparent by the ebb and flow of traffic, I've been busy lately and just plain missed it...However his conduct was wrong then, it's wrong today. meaning you jumped into without bothering to know what you were typing about and shoot off our keyboard cut Bravo, Dee...However I doubt that there is a court in the United States that would fault a man for blooding the nose of a creep who defiled his spouse. Similar case occured in Chattanooga a couple years back..."Case Dismissed" for lack of evidence. showing of course what we in the north have known for years, thatthe courts of the south often do not uphold the law and that they can be pretty brazen about it 73 Steve, K4YZ |
More Markie Mularkie
an old friend wrote: K4YZ wrote: Dee Flint wrote: "K4YZ" wrote in message oups.com... nobodys old friend wrote: Dave Heil wrote: cut A little late there to protest, Steve. He started that several weeks ago. I simply choose to shun such people. An apology of my own then, Dee, but as I am sure it's apparent by the ebb and flow of traffic, I've been busy lately and just plain missed it...However his conduct was wrong then, it's wrong today. meaning you jumped into without bothering to know what you were typing about and shoot off our keyboard Nope. Meaning your conduct was inappropriate then, it's inappropriate now, and always WILL be inappropriate. Bravo, Dee...However I doubt that there is a court in the United States that would fault a man for blooding the nose of a creep who defiled his spouse. Similar case occured in Chattanooga a couple years back..."Case Dismissed" for lack of evidence. showing of course what we in the north have known for years, thatthe courts of the south often do not uphold the law Sure they do. and that they can be pretty brazen about it Brazen about upholding their own law...?!?! You're SUCH an IDIOT, Markie! Steve, K4YZ |
More Markie Mularkie
K4YZ wrote: an old friend wrote: K4YZ wrote: Dee Flint wrote: "K4YZ" wrote in message oups.com... nobodys old friend wrote: Dave Heil wrote: cut A little late there to protest, Steve. He started that several weeks ago. I simply choose to shun such people. An apology of my own then, Dee, but as I am sure it's apparent by the ebb and flow of traffic, I've been busy lately and just plain missed it...However his conduct was wrong then, it's wrong today. meaning you jumped into without bothering to know what you were typing about and shoot off our keyboard Nope. yes meaning you jumped insoemthing without checking your facts Meaning your conduct was inappropriate then, it's inappropriate now, and always WILL be inappropriate. Bravo, Dee...However I doubt that there is a court in the United States that would fault a man for blooding the nose of a creep who defiled his spouse. Similar case occured in Chattanooga a couple years back..."Case Dismissed" for lack of evidence. showing of course what we in the north have known for years, thatthe courts of the south often do not uphold the law Sure they do. and that they can be pretty brazen about it Brazen about upholding their own law...?!?! about not upoholding it You're SUCH an IDIOT, Markie! Steve, K4YZ |
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 05:00 AM. |
|
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
RadioBanter.com