|
More Markie Mularkie
K4YZ wrote: nobodys old friend wrote: Dave Heil wrote: Do you recall my comments about your imprecision with words? You proved it above. See your terms "occoured" and "spliting". wrong again I simply proved I suffer from Dyslexia and what the doc termed Dyslexiod aphasia I used the terms pricisely No, you did not. You were IMPRECISE in your use of the words. Your TYPING errors come from laziness and haste, NOT dyslexia. precticing med without a license so flushing the rest |
More Markie Mularkie
"K4YZ" wrote in message oups.com... nobodys old friend wrote: Dave Heil wrote: [snip] I didn't write "for life", Mark. I wrote "in life". Remember, you're supposed to be the fellow the 248 IQ. The two terms are quite different. for life in life there is no difference her thier are in other context There is absolutely EVERY difference in the context! but I don't need HF in my or for my life Obvioulsy that's not true. You've been spanking that monkey in here for years. Even Dee Flint while being an elist bitch about a lot of things does not contend she or anyone is being forced to read my stuff WHOA! You go on and on about "disagreeing is not lying", etc, and you call a WOMAN who has NEVER used such language about you a BITCH...?!?! A little late there to protest, Steve. He started that several weeks ago. I simply choose to shun such people. You need to get knocked off your feet for that one, Markie! And I mean a solid, blood letting smack in the middle of your greasy face! He isn't worth the bother. Considering she ALSO lives in Michigan, and there may very well be a MR Flint, I'd think that an APOLOGY for the poor choice of adjectives might be in order! While there does happen to be a Mr. Flint, I would never permit him to risk problems for himself over someone like this. Dee D. Flint, N8UZE |
More Markie Mularkie
Dee Flint wrote: "K4YZ" wrote in message oups.com... nobodys old friend wrote: Dave Heil wrote: [snip] I didn't write "for life", Mark. I wrote "in life". Remember, you're supposed to be the fellow the 248 IQ. The two terms are quite different. for life in life there is no difference her thier are in other context There is absolutely EVERY difference in the context! but I don't need HF in my or for my life Obvioulsy that's not true. You've been spanking that monkey in here for years. Even Dee Flint while being an elist bitch about a lot of things does not contend she or anyone is being forced to read my stuff WHOA! You go on and on about "disagreeing is not lying", etc, and you call a WOMAN who has NEVER used such language about you a BITCH...?!?! A little late there to protest, Steve. He started that several weeks ago. I simply choose to shun such people. An apology of my own then, Dee, but as I am sure it's apparent by the ebb and flow of traffic, I've been busy lately and just plain missed it...However his conduct was wrong then, it's wrong today. You need to get knocked off your feet for that one, Markie! And I mean a solid, blood letting smack in the middle of your greasy face! He isn't worth the bother. Hear hear. Considering she ALSO lives in Michigan, and there may very well be a MR Flint, I'd think that an APOLOGY for the poor choice of adjectives might be in order! While there does happen to be a Mr. Flint, I would never permit him to risk problems for himself over someone like this. Bravo, Dee...However I doubt that there is a court in the United States that would fault a man for blooding the nose of a creep who defiled his spouse. Similar case occured in Chattanooga a couple years back..."Case Dismissed" for lack of evidence. 73 Steve, K4YZ |
More Markie Mularkie
"K4YZ" wrote in message oups.com... Dee Flint wrote: "K4YZ" wrote in message oups.com... nobodys old friend wrote: Dave Heil wrote: [snip] I didn't write "for life", Mark. I wrote "in life". Remember, you're supposed to be the fellow the 248 IQ. The two terms are quite different. for life in life there is no difference her thier are in other context There is absolutely EVERY difference in the context! but I don't need HF in my or for my life Obvioulsy that's not true. You've been spanking that monkey in here for years. Even Dee Flint while being an elist bitch about a lot of things does not contend she or anyone is being forced to read my stuff WHOA! You go on and on about "disagreeing is not lying", etc, and you call a WOMAN who has NEVER used such language about you a BITCH...?!?! A little late there to protest, Steve. He started that several weeks ago. I simply choose to shun such people. An apology of my own then, Dee, but as I am sure it's apparent by the ebb and flow of traffic, I've been busy lately and just plain missed it...However his conduct was wrong then, it's wrong today. Yeah I noticed your appearances have been irregular. And I agree that is conduct is wrong. However, I absolutely refuse to feed his ego and so take very little notice of his remarks. Here's an irony for you. He considers Extras to be elitists but is planning to become one himself as soon as possible after the code testing is dropped! Dee D. Flint, N8UZE |
More Markie Mularkie
Dee Flint wrote: "K4YZ" wrote in message oups.com... cut Here's an irony for you. He considers Extras to be elitists but is planning to become one himself as soon as possible after the code testing is dropped! now alsas you cross the line into Lair or perhaps it is ego manaic I never said extras are elitists I said you are I have said other hams that happen to extras are but you personalize a coment about yourself to mean what it does not say Dee D. Flint, N8UZE |
More Markie Mularkie
K4YZ wrote: Dee Flint wrote: "K4YZ" wrote in message oups.com... nobodys old friend wrote: Dave Heil wrote: cut A little late there to protest, Steve. He started that several weeks ago. I simply choose to shun such people. An apology of my own then, Dee, but as I am sure it's apparent by the ebb and flow of traffic, I've been busy lately and just plain missed it...However his conduct was wrong then, it's wrong today. meaning you jumped into without bothering to know what you were typing about and shoot off our keyboard cut Bravo, Dee...However I doubt that there is a court in the United States that would fault a man for blooding the nose of a creep who defiled his spouse. Similar case occured in Chattanooga a couple years back..."Case Dismissed" for lack of evidence. showing of course what we in the north have known for years, thatthe courts of the south often do not uphold the law and that they can be pretty brazen about it 73 Steve, K4YZ |
More Markie Mularkie
an old friend wrote: K4YZ wrote: Dee Flint wrote: "K4YZ" wrote in message oups.com... nobodys old friend wrote: Dave Heil wrote: cut A little late there to protest, Steve. He started that several weeks ago. I simply choose to shun such people. An apology of my own then, Dee, but as I am sure it's apparent by the ebb and flow of traffic, I've been busy lately and just plain missed it...However his conduct was wrong then, it's wrong today. meaning you jumped into without bothering to know what you were typing about and shoot off our keyboard Nope. Meaning your conduct was inappropriate then, it's inappropriate now, and always WILL be inappropriate. Bravo, Dee...However I doubt that there is a court in the United States that would fault a man for blooding the nose of a creep who defiled his spouse. Similar case occured in Chattanooga a couple years back..."Case Dismissed" for lack of evidence. showing of course what we in the north have known for years, thatthe courts of the south often do not uphold the law Sure they do. and that they can be pretty brazen about it Brazen about upholding their own law...?!?! You're SUCH an IDIOT, Markie! Steve, K4YZ |
More Markie Mularkie
K4YZ wrote: an old friend wrote: K4YZ wrote: Dee Flint wrote: "K4YZ" wrote in message oups.com... nobodys old friend wrote: Dave Heil wrote: cut A little late there to protest, Steve. He started that several weeks ago. I simply choose to shun such people. An apology of my own then, Dee, but as I am sure it's apparent by the ebb and flow of traffic, I've been busy lately and just plain missed it...However his conduct was wrong then, it's wrong today. meaning you jumped into without bothering to know what you were typing about and shoot off our keyboard Nope. yes meaning you jumped insoemthing without checking your facts Meaning your conduct was inappropriate then, it's inappropriate now, and always WILL be inappropriate. Bravo, Dee...However I doubt that there is a court in the United States that would fault a man for blooding the nose of a creep who defiled his spouse. Similar case occured in Chattanooga a couple years back..."Case Dismissed" for lack of evidence. showing of course what we in the north have known for years, thatthe courts of the south often do not uphold the law Sure they do. and that they can be pretty brazen about it Brazen about upholding their own law...?!?! about not upoholding it You're SUCH an IDIOT, Markie! Steve, K4YZ |
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 05:43 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
RadioBanter.com