|
Day 2 - 05-235 - Any new procode test arguments?
"an old friend" wrote in message oups.com... Bill Sohl wrote: Some 48 hours has elapsed and only one new argument was raised and that has no actual example(s) of any country no longer granting reciprocal licenses to amy of the 20+ countries that have already ended all code testing. Cheers, Bill K2UNK any thought on how you will keep this up? just cruious my own siggestion is 7 days then weekly til the R&O comes out Since the comment phase is now officially closed I was only asking if anyone knew of any new arguments filed in support of code testing. Jim N2EY gave us one...but, now that I think about it, he never actually said that he or anyone else actually submitted that argument as actual comments to the NPRM. My opinion, we ain't gonna see anything new beyond Jim's rather weak addition...which may not even by an actual submission. I'll give the folks a week or so per your suggestion "old friend". Cheers, Bill K2UNK |
Day 4 - 05-235 - Any new procode test arguments?
Still nothing of any consequence.
Cheers, Bill K2UNK "Bill Sohl" wrote in message ink.net... "an old friend" wrote in message oups.com... Bill Sohl wrote: Some 48 hours has elapsed and only one new argument was raised and that has no actual example(s) of any country no longer granting reciprocal licenses to amy of the 20+ countries that have already ended all code testing. Cheers, Bill K2UNK any thought on how you will keep this up? just cruious my own siggestion is 7 days then weekly til the R&O comes out Since the comment phase is now officially closed I was only asking if anyone knew of any new arguments filed in support of code testing. Jim N2EY gave us one...but, now that I think about it, he never actually said that he or anyone else actually submitted that argument as actual comments to the NPRM. My opinion, we ain't gonna see anything new beyond Jim's rather weak addition...which may not even by an actual submission. I'll give the folks a week or so per your suggestion "old friend". Cheers, Bill K2UNK |
Day 4 - 05-235 - Any new procode test arguments?
Bill Sohl wrote: Still nothing of any consequence. Cheers, Bill K2UNK "Bill Sohl" wrote in message ink.net... "an old friend" wrote in message groups.com... Bill Sohl wrote: Some 48 hours has elapsed and only one new argument was raised and that has no actual example(s) of any country no longer granting reciprocal licenses to amy of the 20+ countries that have already ended all code testing. Cheers, Bill K2UNK any thought on how you will keep this up? just cruious my own siggestion is 7 days then weekly til the R&O comes out Since the comment phase is now officially closed I was only asking if anyone knew of any new arguments filed in support of code testing. Jim N2EY gave us one...but, now that I think about it, he never actually said that he or anyone else actually submitted that argument as actual comments to the NPRM. My opinion, we ain't gonna see anything new beyond Jim's rather weak addition...which may not even by an actual submission. I'll give the folks a week or so per your suggestion "old friend". Cheers, Bill K2UNK I did see at least one comment (no idea who's) that mentioned reciprocal licenses. I believe it proposed not the retention of code testing to get a license but some form of code endorsement to satisfy some other country's requirement. John |
Day 4 - 05-235 - Any new procode test arguments?
John wrote: Bill Sohl wrote: Still nothing of any consequence. cut I did see at least one comment (no idea who's) that mentioned reciprocal licenses. I believe it proposed not the retention of code testing to get a license but some form of code endorsement to satisfy some other country's requirement. Jim refers to this idea but can't id any comenteor that made it BillSohl addressed the issue elsewhere but that is IMO the best answer to what new idea has been advanced to date If you send me a SASE (kb9rqz) I will send you your wining's 1 cent and a note that you likely can't read congratualting you John |
Day 7 - 05-235 - Any new procode test arguments?
Well I thnk it's time to stop waiting.
Day 7 and nothing new. Cheers, Bill K2UNK "an_old_friend" wrote in message oups.com... John wrote: Bill Sohl wrote: Still nothing of any consequence. cut I did see at least one comment (no idea who's) that mentioned reciprocal licenses. I believe it proposed not the retention of code testing to get a license but some form of code endorsement to satisfy some other country's requirement. Jim refers to this idea but can't id any comenteor that made it BillSohl addressed the issue elsewhere but that is IMO the best answer to what new idea has been advanced to date If you send me a SASE (kb9rqz) I will send you your wining's 1 cent and a note that you likely can't read congratualting you John |
Day 7 - 05-235 - Any new procode test arguments?
Bill Sohl wrote: Well I thnk it's time to stop waiting. Day 7 and nothing new. Never is, and that's the point. Removal of Code Testing is long overdue. |
Day 7 - 05-235 - Any new procode test arguments?
Bill Sohl wrote:
Well I thnk it's time to stop waiting. Day 7 and nothing new. With all due respect, Bill.... Did you really expect that someone would point the way, so that anticodetest folks could write reply comments without having to look through all the comments? 73 de Jim, N2EY |
Day 7 - 05-235 - Any new procode test arguments?
|
Day 7 - 05-235 - Any new procode test arguments?
an old friend wrote:
wrote: Bill Sohl wrote: Well I thnk it's time to stop waiting. Day 7 and nothing new. With all due respect, Bill.... Did you really expect that someone would point the way, so that anticodetest folks could write reply comments without having to look through all the comments? No I doubt that Bill thinks the Procoder feel any reagrd to engage in opne deabte we have hae in the SOP of most of the procoders here However Bill in addresing the NG does not merely addres the ProCoder So, answer his question! OTOH the If the ProCoders have got something new they need to shouting it off the roof top so the FCC might hear and consider this new point Why mention it here? the best New point is so repceprical licenseing issues but that hardly seems enough to turn the course (it is but a hicup issue ar best) Logical the R&O should be by the end of the week or at worst the month How is that "logical"? FCC has no set deadline to produce the R&O. Given the large number of comments, reply comments and other filings to consider, it will not be a quick process. Remember that FCC doesn't just have to read the comments - they also have to decide which arguments are most compelling, cite them, and justify their decision. On top of that is the fact that while the majority of commenters support removing the code test for General, the majority of commenters also support keeping the code test for Extra. So if FCC wants to remove the code test for Extra, they have to justify ignoring what the majority wants. The R&Os from FCC are carefully worded, and that sort of thing takes a bunch of time. However the Govt is not known for its logical behavoir I don't think you understand "logical", Mark. |
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 02:41 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
RadioBanter.com