wrote:

ex-RA 16 408 336, ex-ER 16 408 336, Honorable Discharge 1960

And lying about what he did ever since.........

Steve, K4YZ

K4YZ wrote:
wrote:

ex-RA 16 408 336, ex-ER 16 408 336, Honorable Discharge 1960

And lying about what he did ever since.........

you are nuts

Steve, K4YZ

From: K4YZ on Nov 11, 4:06 am

wrote:
From: on Nov 10, 4:41 pm

Interesting that after having had his nose rubbed in his own
numbers, Lennie changes style and format of his "scorecard" series of
posts and threads...Trying to hide the facts, as usual...The FACTS that
those comments Jim was refering to DON'T support Lennie's opinion as
being in the majority.

Dudly the Imposter has no "facts" to accuse anyone of anything.

I started the "score card" postings on 2 August 2005 after
accumulating enough opinion data on WT Docket 05-235 filings
to see four categories. The first non-FCC filings began
on 20 July 2005.

The official Comment beginning did not occur until the Federal
Register notice of NPRM 05-143 on 31 August 2005. At that
date I elected to show a double tally of opinions, the original
one and one that began on 31 August. The first posting of
that new tally format began 1 September 2005.

Due to a great number of posts under the above 2nd subject
thread that went beyond the scope of the "score card," I
changed the "score card" posts to another thread beginning
17 October 2005. The same format of the 2nd thread ("double
tally") was kept in this third thread.

The tally postings were almost daily except for one 2 1/2
week period in September-October when my wife and I were on
a trip and I was away from easy Internet access and tallies.
All of the categorizations were done as honestly and fairly
as possible, reading each of the Comments and Replies to
Comments. Opinions of greater than 90% of all filings were
rather obviously in three categories of For the NPRM, Against
the NPRM, or Code-Test-for-Extra-but-OK-to-drop-code-test-for-
other-classes.

All of my "score card" postings are still in Google and may
be accessed by anyone with Google access. NOTHING was
"hidden." By viewing the continuously-posted tally postings,
it is quite evident that a better than 2:1 ratio in favor of
the NPRM was held at the starting weeks of the Comment
period. That ratio began to change from the date of notice
in the Federal Register that the NPRM Comment period had
begun on 31 August 2005. The tallies can be verified by
anyone reading all 3,760 filings in WT Docket 05-235 as of
the close of ECFS updates on 10 November 2005.

It should be noted that the official Comment period on NPRM
05-143 ENDED on 31 October. The Reply to Comments period is
still officially OPEN until Monday, 14 November 2005, as
stated in the Federal Register of 31 August 2005. Among the
9 official Replies to Comments (the other 48 are unofficial
Comments), all of them are FOR the NPRM. Those who bother
to look at the many tally postings I made will see the trend
of opinion changing weekly. Nothing was hidden.

Posting of the "score card" was terminated after the official
end of the Comment period on 31 October 2005. The number of
other posts of continual argument and bickering were so great
that it was no longer worthwhile to continue the tally posting
in public.

There are no "rules" on posting tallies of public opinion
except those of the person(s) doing the tally. That another
has posted an alleged "analysis" of WT Docket 05-235 filing
contents is not any valid argument against what I have done.



None-the-less, it will be interesting to see, after whatever
action the FCC takes in regards to dropping the Code Test, if Lennie
will then get the "Extra Lite" (or any other HF-authorized license) or
continue to spam the NG with his anti-Amateur Radio bile...

Irrelevant and incorrect. What I do in the future is of no
concern to any action of the FCC to make a final Report and
Order as a result of the end of the Comments and Replies to
Comments. The Commission will make a decision at some
future time but that time will not be soon. The number of
filings in WT Docket 05-235 exceed those made on WT Docket
98-143 ("Restructuring") by about 1,500; WT Docket 98-143
had only about 2,200 filings in the official Comment and
Replies to Comments period of about 11 months time.

As to the past, Dudly the Imposter has NOT yet provided any
proof whatsoever that he was ever IN any of the alleged
"seven hostile actions" he claimed he was in. He has NOT
yet been able to name a single item of radio communications
equipment used by him for military radio communications.
Dudly has NOT proven that he knows anything about electronics
engineering or radio design other than claiming less than a
half year's employment as a purchasing agent at a smallish
electronics company. Dudly the Imposter has been challenged
with providing proof of his alleged USMC Gunnery Sergeant
rating by another, a USMC veteran who HAS provided enough
visible evidence that what this other USMC veteran has
written. Dudly has NOT yet explained how he got a
"changed-to-honorable-from-medical" discharge from the
military AND received a pension that is available only after
20 years' military service. Us readers have NOTHING from
Dudly other than a number of written postings full of
personal insults such as -

Putz.

Dudly the Imposter is a fraud, a travesty of a wannabe
military hero who cannot prove a thing he has claimed.
Given that we passed Veterans' Day, Dudly the Imposter
has cast great dishonor on himself, the United States
Marine Corps, and all United States Amateur Radio Extra
class grantees.



ex-RA 16 408 336, ex-ER 16 408 336, Honorable Discharge 1960

general question on the topic. are the reply coments at 1201 am 15Nove
or or 1201 16 Nov

From: an old friend on Nov 14, 11:37 am

general question on the topic. are the reply coments at 1201 am 15Nove
or or 1201 16 Nov

The official dates for Comments on WT Docket 05-235 were
31 August 2005 to 31 October 2005.

The official dates for Replies to Comments on WT Docket
05-235 were 31 August 2005 to 14 November 2005.

All time periods refer to Eastern Time Zone. Apparently, and I
don't know for certain, the FCC will accept the time of day of
the time zone of the sender. ECFS lists only the DATE filed,
not the time it was filed. They do enter in copies of
letters-on-paper which were sent from within the official
dates but arrived at the Commission later, evident from the
FCC time-stamp on documents compared to the ECFS filing date.

Regardless, the official time period on WT Docket 05-235 is
now OVER. As of 3 PM EST on 15 November 2005 there were a
total of 3,783 filings made on WT Docket 05-235 between
15 July 2005 and 14 November 2005.

The ECFS will still accept electronic comments entered long
after the end of an official date period. WT Docket 98-143
on the NPRM proposing Restructuring was still getting input
from about 400 people up to nearly FOUR YEARS AFTER the end
of all Comments, and up to nearly THREE YEARS after Report &
Order 99-412 was released (end of December 1999) making the
Restructuring legal.