"pointyhead" wrote in message
...
Pierian Spring wrote:

Is it time for all _REAL_ Radio Hams to refuse
to have anything to do with such mental derangees
and their charges, and institute an age bar, perhaps
16-years-old, below which we will not associate in any
way?

Too complicated OM. Just refuse to have anything to do with any M3,
works fine for me.

--
Proud Holder of Old Nick's Deputy First Class Badge

me too......

pointyhead wrote:

Too complicated OM. Just refuse to have anything to do with any M3,
works fine for me.

--
Proud Holder of Old Nick's Deputy First Class Badge

And this is what I mean, Walt. And why he should a proud holder
Heaven alone knows.

"Pierian Spring" wrote in message
oups.com...
It seems that anyone of those who are involved ...


The difference between licence categories is now merely a sop to the few
hams who still retain their licences and want to pull-up-the-ladder behind
them in a pathetic attempt to feel superior. This is what you have just said
this in several paragraphs, but my one brief sentence says it more plainly.

Having several licence classes from CB upwards (is that the right word?) is
an administrative nonsense. Ofcom has already realised this, aided greatly
by RSGB's incompetent bungling in trying to maintain its jobs.

The arbitary categories ARE on the way out, regardless of what you or I may
say about it. We have only to wait and see.

"AmateurCB" wrote:

"Pierian Spring" wrote in message
oups.com...
It seems that anyone of those who are involved ...


The difference between licence categories is now merely a sop to the few
hams who still retain their licences and want to pull-up-the-ladder behind
them in a pathetic attempt to feel superior. This is what you have just said
this in several paragraphs, but my one brief sentence says it more plainly.

Having several licence classes from CB upwards (is that the right word?) is
an administrative nonsense. Ofcom has already realised this, aided greatly
by RSGB's incompetent bungling in trying to maintain its jobs.

The arbitary categories ARE on the way out, regardless of what you or I may
say about it. We have only to wait and see.



hmmm....





- - - - - - - - - -

From: "Brian Reay"
Subject: FULL DETAILS OF NEW LICENCE PROPOSALS ON RA SITE
Date: Fri, 21 Sep 2001 19:58:32 +0100

The new announced is totally irrational and, at last, finally exposes the
nonsense of the morse requirement. A Foundation Licensee could no way learn
morse to 5wpm (as well as the other material) in a weekend BUT he will be
let loose on HF. A far better qualified B licensee is denied access because
morse is required for HF access!

"Pierian Spring" wrote:



time?

it was time long ago.

i'm glad to say that my VALID qsl card 'box' remains free of any
undesirable hf contacts.

Indeed, and why is it when we observe the
anti-social trends in M3/CB Fools' Licences,
that trend follows the infantile and abusive
histories of those in this NG who have indicated
that thet are part of the training schemes, the Reays,
Gathergoods and Preeces of this world?

Are the L.I.A.R.'s of this world responsible for more
than just technical decline?

Pierian Spring wrote:
It seems that anyone of those who are involved
in any way with childrens' organisations or with
the inducing of children to tackle the kindergarten
entrance examination (that is represented by
the 6-year-olds' qualification of the M3/CB Fools'
Licence) exhibit behavioural traits - infantile
outbursts, deliberately insulting tirades and
vicious temper tantrums - that one would expect only
from the children in their care.

Michael Garner-Superlative wrote:
Indeed, and why is it when we observe the
anti-social trends in M3/CB Fools' Licences,
that trend follows the infantile and abusive
histories of those in this NG who have indicated
that thet are part of the training schemes, the Reays,
Gathergoods and Preeces of this world?

Are the L.I.A.R.'s of this world responsible for more
than just technical decline?

Pierian Spring wrote:
It seems that anyone of those who are involved
in any way with childrens' organisations or with
the inducing of children to tackle the kindergarten
entrance examination (that is represented by
the 6-year-olds' qualification of the M3/CB Fools'
Licence) exhibit behavioural traits - infantile
outbursts, deliberately insulting tirades and
vicious temper tantrums - that one would expect only
from the children in their care.

Why are you answering your own question?

--
huLLy
Tel: 07976 123278
ICQ 136-987-925

huLLy wrote:
Why are you answering your own question?

"Mike Garner-Superlative" and "Font Of All Knowledge" are just two more
of Gareth's alternative personalities. I have a feeling we'll meet some
more of them before the end of the Christmas holidays.

Give a man enough rope and he'll hang himself. Give Gareth enough
bandwidth, and he'll talk himself into a padded cell.

73
Mike G4KFK

wrote:
huLLy wrote:
Why are you answering your own question?

"Mike Garner-Superlative" and "Font Of All Knowledge" are just two more
of Gareth's alternative personalities. I have a feeling we'll meet some
more of them before the end of the Christmas holidays.

Give a man enough rope and he'll hang himself. Give Gareth enough
bandwidth, and he'll talk himself into a padded cell.

only if the standard is much lower than in the USA

73
Mike G4KFK

I wonder why it is, that having revealed that you are an
adult associated with scouting, that all your contributions
to Usenet have been rather silly and childish, such as the
childish outburst below?

Is there a general concern that the populace of Britland
should have about adults who are associated with childrens'
organisations and who go out of their way to seek association
with children?

wrote:

Give a man enough rope and he'll hang himself. Give Gareth enough
bandwidth, and he'll talk himself into a padded cell.