Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#11
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Pierian Spring" wrote:
time? it was time long ago. i'm glad to say that my VALID qsl card 'box' remains free of any undesirable hf contacts. |
#12
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"AmateurCB" wrote:
"Pierian Spring" wrote in message oups.com... It seems that anyone of those who are involved ... The difference between licence categories is now merely a sop to the few hams who still retain their licences and want to pull-up-the-ladder behind them in a pathetic attempt to feel superior. This is what you have just said this in several paragraphs, but my one brief sentence says it more plainly. Having several licence classes from CB upwards (is that the right word?) is an administrative nonsense. Ofcom has already realised this, aided greatly by RSGB's incompetent bungling in trying to maintain its jobs. The arbitary categories ARE on the way out, regardless of what you or I may say about it. We have only to wait and see. hmmm.... - - - - - - - - - - From: "Brian Reay" Subject: FULL DETAILS OF NEW LICENCE PROPOSALS ON RA SITE Date: Fri, 21 Sep 2001 19:58:32 +0100 The new announced is totally irrational and, at last, finally exposes the nonsense of the morse requirement. A Foundation Licensee could no way learn morse to 5wpm (as well as the other material) in a weekend BUT he will be let loose on HF. A far better qualified B licensee is denied access because morse is required for HF access! |
#13
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Indeed, and why is it when we observe the
anti-social trends in M3/CB Fools' Licences, that trend follows the infantile and abusive histories of those in this NG who have indicated that thet are part of the training schemes, the Reays, Gathergoods and Preeces of this world? Are the L.I.A.R.'s of this world responsible for more than just technical decline? Pierian Spring wrote: It seems that anyone of those who are involved in any way with childrens' organisations or with the inducing of children to tackle the kindergarten entrance examination (that is represented by the 6-year-olds' qualification of the M3/CB Fools' Licence) exhibit behavioural traits - infantile outbursts, deliberately insulting tirades and vicious temper tantrums - that one would expect only from the children in their care. |
#14
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Michael Garner-Superlative wrote:
Indeed, and why is it when we observe the anti-social trends in M3/CB Fools' Licences, that trend follows the infantile and abusive histories of those in this NG who have indicated that thet are part of the training schemes, the Reays, Gathergoods and Preeces of this world? Are the L.I.A.R.'s of this world responsible for more than just technical decline? Pierian Spring wrote: It seems that anyone of those who are involved in any way with childrens' organisations or with the inducing of children to tackle the kindergarten entrance examination (that is represented by the 6-year-olds' qualification of the M3/CB Fools' Licence) exhibit behavioural traits - infantile outbursts, deliberately insulting tirades and vicious temper tantrums - that one would expect only from the children in their care. Why are you answering your own question? -- huLLy Tel: 07976 123278 ICQ 136-987-925 |
#15
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() Gareth Alun Evans (G4SDW) wrote: You are hoist by your own petard. Nah - that's not being hoisted by one's own petard. When you bang on about youngsters starting at the entry level into the hobby, referring to them as "retards", and then someone reminds you that you had a G8 callsign for 12 years and that you were already an adult when you received it .... that's being hoisted by your own petard. When you bang on about the gentlemanly traditions of amateur radio, then someone reminds you that you were arrested for harassment .... that's being hoisted by your own petard. When you bang on about amateur radio being a technical pursuit, then someone reminds you that you tried to flog an FT101E because you couldn't tune it up without written instructions ..... that's being hoisted by your own petard. 73 Mike G4KFK |
#16
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#17
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() huLLy wrote: Why are you answering your own question? "Mike Garner-Superlative" and "Font Of All Knowledge" are just two more of Gareth's alternative personalities. I have a feeling we'll meet some more of them before the end of the Christmas holidays. Give a man enough rope and he'll hang himself. Give Gareth enough bandwidth, and he'll talk himself into a padded cell. 73 Mike G4KFK |
#18
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
An interesting thought
I was just turning 15 in 1962 when I obtained my novice license (WN2CJV). A few years later, I obtained my general (WB2OSP). I obtained my extra class ticket along with my 1st phone and 2nd telegraph (too young for my 1st plus needed 6 months shipboard experience) along with my radar endorsement in 1966. I would gently suggest not a change in years, but a reasonable test for the licenses. I disliked Morse at first, but ended up copying 40 words per minute perfect copy in Bainbridge, MD. for the U.S. Navy on a manual typewriter. For someone who disliked the code, I would suggest that 15 or 20 words per minute is not unreasonable. As to theory, methinks that one should be able to solve something other than simple series/parallel circuits (multiple seats of voltage in a complex circuit) for their extra. That aside, there should be a fairly simple exam to allow folks easy entrance into amateur radio. No need for Morse and there should be limited HF allocations. Just my thoughts. 73 from Rochester, NY Jim AA2QA "Pierian Spring" wrote in message oups.com... It seems that anyone of those who are involved in any way with childrens' organisations or with the inducing of children to tackle the kindergarten entrance examination (that is represented by the 6-year-olds' qualification of the M3/CB Fools' Licence) exhibit behavioural traits - infantile outbursts, deliberately insulting tirades and vicious temper tantrums - that one would expect only from the children in their care. Is it time for all _REAL_ Radio Hams to refuse to have anything to do with such mental derangees and their charges, and institute an age bar, perhaps 16-years-old, below which we will not associate in any way? Only then, by making it clear that young children are not, and cannot be in any way, part of the society of adult technocrats that is Radio Hammery will be be able to influence them not to attempt to join us until they have achieved maturity? Word will soon get around if children who have been conned by the various Billies-No_Mates into going for the M3/CB fools' Licence find that no-one will speak to them. |
#19
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#20
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Once again you respond with infantile outbursts
whose purpose is to cause offence. Shame on you. The issues you sneer at below have been well covered - and answered - already and, despite your somewhat infantile intentions do not cause offence in the way that you intend; they only cause amusement to those of us who are the adults and gentlemen of Ham Radio- amusement that you continue to represent yourself as a maladjusted infant. As to the issue of harassment, I will cover that once again. I have contributed to this NG for a number of years and have consistently supported my view of what is Ham Radio, and have done that without indulging in the sorts of behaviours that are out of place with those associate with the scouts such as you exhibit below. For some reason, those from the gutter who should not be associated in any way with children (such as yourself below) choose to pick on me and proceed to illustrate very well what is the difference between those in the hobby (CB Radio) and those in the adult technical pursuit (Ham Radio). One such childish degenerate, Brian Reay, G8OSN / M3OSN subjected me over a number of years to a grossly offensive series of infantile and abusive tirades in which he accused me of sheep shagging, said that my wife was a sheep next to me in the bed, made rude comments about my children, repeated accused me of drinking methylated spirit and capped it all by posting publicly that he was deliberately harassing me and trying to wind me up. I discovered that when he was demonstrating so publicly his sexual deviation and obsession with sheep shagging that he was under training to be a teacher at a girls' school in Dartford, Kent and my indignation at his one-sided socially-maladjusted campaign boiled ove rand I suggested, in the best traditions of public responsibility that his sexual deviation made him unsuited to being a schoolteacher. Brian Reay's infantile psyche could not take having the tables turned on him and he made a deliberately misleading and perjurous complaint to the plods to claim that I was harassing him rather than the other way around. The We'll ****e (All Over You) plods have lng had a campaign of harassment against me and took Brian Reay at his word, did not check the evidence (Especially the popsts by Brian Reay admitting to a campaign of harassment) came to arrest me in force, kicking me in the face. Now you really ought to know that it is not an arrest that indicates wickedness, especially when the matter is dropped for lack of evidence and without charges being indicted. However, your infantile disposition and desperate need to cause offence will not be bothered by a small detail like the truth, will it. The trial of the plod Richard Fuller for assault is now scheduled for the 8th Feb at 10:00 AM at Chippenham. wrote: Gareth Alun Evans (G4SDW) wrote: You are hoist by your own petard. Nah - that's not being hoisted by one's own petard. When you bang on about youngsters starting at the entry level into the hobby, referring to them as "retards", and then someone reminds you that you had a G8 callsign for 12 years and that you were already an adult when you received it .... that's being hoisted by your own petard. When you bang on about the gentlemanly traditions of amateur radio, then someone reminds you that you were arrested for harassment .... that's being hoisted by your own petard. When you bang on about amateur radio being a technical pursuit, then someone reminds you that you tried to flog an FT101E because you couldn't tune it up without written instructions ..... that's being hoisted by your own petard. 73 Mike G4KFK |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Utillity freq List; | Shortwave | |||
203 English-language HF Broadcasts audible in NE US (27-NOV-04) | Shortwave | |||
shortwv | Shortwave | |||
Amateur Radio Newslineâ„¢ Report 1402 Â June 25, 2004 | Shortwave | |||
183 English-language HF Broadcasts audible in NE US (30-MAR-04) | Shortwave |