On Sat, 31 Dec 2005 06:08:36 GMT, "KØHB"
wrote:


"Dee Flint" wrote


there is a distinct feeling, IMHO, that the FCC does NOT want people to stay
at the introductory level.



Well that's pretty obvious, isn't it, since they closed the introductory level
to new applicants at the last restructuring!

Which raises the next question --- who CARES what the FCC wants. They should
serve the wants of the people, not the other way around.

hear they certainlt should serve the interest of the People in this
case what serves the interest of all the people since the RF belong to
us all includingthe example of Len aderson

73, de Hans, K0HB




_________________________________________
Usenet Zone Free Binaries Usenet Server
More than 140,000 groups
Unlimited download
http://www.usenetzone.com to open account

wrote:
On Sat, 31 Dec 2005 06:08:36 GMT, "KØHB"
wrote:


"Dee Flint" wrote


there is a distinct feeling, IMHO, that the FCC does NOT want people to stay
at the introductory level.



Well that's pretty obvious, isn't it, since they closed the introductorylevel
to new applicants at the last restructuring!

Which raises the next question --- who CARES what the FCC wants. Theyshould
serve the wants of the people, not the other way around.

hear they certainlt should serve the interest of the People in this
case what serves the interest of all the people since the RF belong to
us all includingthe example of Len aderson

Ham Radio belongs to the people who benefit from our emergency planning
and our emergency exercises. They probably don't even know who they
are. Yet...

wrote:
wrote:
On Sat, 31 Dec 2005 06:08:36 GMT, "KØHB"
wrote:


"Dee Flint" wrote


there is a distinct feeling, IMHO, that the FCC does NOT want people to stay
at the introductory level.



Well that's pretty obvious, isn't it, since they closed the introductory level
to new applicants at the last restructuring!

Which raises the next question --- who CARES what the FCC wants. They should
serve the wants of the people, not the other way around.

hear they certainlt should serve the interest of the People in this
case what serves the interest of all the people since the RF belong to
us all includingthe example of Len aderson

Ham Radio belongs to the people who benefit from our emergency planning
and our emergency exercises. They probably don't even know who they
are. Yet...

absolutely len is merely one of those people there are billions of
other world wide but certain people would keep this resource hostage to
their own egos and need to have some paper allowing the say "I am
better than you"

an_old_friend wrote:
wrote:
wrote:

hear they certainlt should serve the interest of the People in this
case what serves the interest of all the people since the RF belong to
us all includingthe example of Len aderson

Ham Radio belongs to the people who benefit from our emergency planning
and our emergency exercises. They probably don't even know who they
are. Yet...

absolutely len is merely one of those people there are billions of
other world wide but certain people would keep this resource hostage to
their own egos

That's like the American Red Cross saying "I need 3 operators per
shift, 3 shifts per day, around the clock until further notice," and
Steve Robeson/K4YZ saying, "You're gonna get no operator on the 1st
shift, two on the second shift, and one on the third shift because I
know what you need better than you do. Besides, leaving an operations
post unmanned is what we did in the Marines."

and need to have some paper allowing the say "I am
better than you"

"I am Extra, here me roar!"