Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#23
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
From: Jeffrey Herman on Dec 31 2005, 6:19 pm
Dec 31 2005, 6:19 pm show options wrote: On 31 Dec 2005 01:52:05 GMT, (Jeffrey Herman) What separates an Extra from an Tech is not a "caste system" but rather who had the motivation to study versus who didn't. a simple lie one of the core lies told by on the side of the ProCode test issue in may case it borders on being a personal slander but that is all to comon too Claiming motivation or a lack of is a lie? How so? Back up your claim with facts. Oh, my, we all have to "back up claims with facts" in order to express OPINIONS? Motivation versus a lack of motivation *is* exactly why we have a population of citizens with various educational, vocational, and wealth differences. Hay, coach, how's about "backing that up with FACTS?" It would have been correct if you struck out "motivation" and replaced it with abilities or aptitudes. Motivation is the key to everything. Study and you'll become what you wish; if you do not study you'll never become anything. The art student with NO art aptitude can study until they are blue in the face about art, but they will NEVER be a great artist. They might know a lot about art history and what others have said is the correct technique with media. The wannabe sports hero can study their buns off on their favorite sport, but if they don't have the ability or aptitude for that sport, they will only amass a mass of facts and statistics. If one doesn't have the aptitude for "hearing" morse code as a "language," all the study in the world will NOT make them good morsemen. The word "motivation" has been terribly MIS-USED for years yet remains a favorite of managers and instructors...and the fleecers who run "motivation classes" and "motivation seminars" for money. The fleecer's "motivation" is greed. The manager who demands all workers be "motivated" doesn't know how to lead or relate to his people. The instructor who stressed "motivation" above all doesn't recognize that students a (1). Required to take certain classes for credit and otherwise don't give a damn about the subject; (2). Might be interested - anyway - in the subject and do NOT need "motivation" exhonerations/nagging. Too many use "motivation" as a buzz-word substitute for themselves being "better than others" because they met the requirements of something and thus like to talk-down to those who complain about requirements. We can all ask YOU why YOU are so "motivated" to hold fast to old requirements in the amateur radio HOBBY and not permit modernization of regulations? Amateur radio is NOT a job, NOT a craft, guild, or union. It is a HOBBY. Hobbies are for personal enjoyment, not a "contest" needing half-time "motivational" speeches by self-styled "coaches" urging their players to "win." |