On Wed, 28 Dec 2005 00:12:07 -0500, wrote in
:

On Tue, 27 Dec 2005 15:05:15 -0800, Frank Gilliland
wrote:

On Tue, 27 Dec 2005 17:50:26 -0500, wrote in
:

by my count stveie has made 3 thread titled last warning and five
posts titled last warning, nd futhr made ref to his last warning
(syaing it expried yesterday

this make a totlal to this point of 6 last warnings


Now we get to watch him squirm for months (possibly even years) while
making lame excuses why he can't or won't follow through on his threat
to take legal action. It's the best Chrisquanzakah ever!!!

or perhaps with his track history try to tell he said nothing of the
sort he still maintinas that threatening to shoot me in illioipolis
was not a threat


I have no doubt that he will try to devise some way to justify his
hypocrisy. Want a good laugh? Crosspost those future excuses to
sci.logic.









----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Unrestricted-Secure Usenet News==----
http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups
----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =----

Frank Gilliland wrote:
On Wed, 28 Dec 2005 00:12:07 -0500, Mark Morgan in a faked screen name wrote in
:

or perhaps with his track history try to tell he said nothing of the
sort he still maintinas that threatening to shoot me in illioipolis
was not a threat

I have no doubt that he will try to devise some way to justify his
hypocrisy. Want a good laugh? Crosspost those future excuses to
sci.logic.

I thought that was filled up with disgraced, court martialed
ex-Marines explaining how admitting their cowardice made it "OK"...

Steve, K4YZ

On 28 Dec 2005 01:06:25 -0800, "Major Dud" wrote in
. com:


Frank Gilliland wrote:
On Wed, 28 Dec 2005 00:12:07 -0500, Mark Morgan in a faked screen name wrote in
:

or perhaps with his track history try to tell he said nothing of the
sort he still maintinas that threatening to shoot me in illioipolis
was not a threat

I have no doubt that he will try to devise some way to justify his
hypocrisy. Want a good laugh? Crosspost those future excuses to
sci.logic.

I thought that was filled up with disgraced, court martialed
ex-Marines explaining how admitting their cowardice made it "OK"...


For example, that was a classic example of Argumentum ad Hominem of
the abusive variety, also known as the Genetic Fallacy. According to
Copi:

"The way in which this irrelevant argument may sometimes persuade is
through the psychological process of transference. Where an attitude
of disapproval toward a person can be evoked, it may possibly tend to
overflow the strictly emotional field and become disagreement with
what that person says. But this connection is only psychololgical, not
logical. Even the most wicked of men may sometimes tell the truth or
argue correctly."


Steve "Yellow Dog" Robeson, K4YZ


Who's your lawyer, Dud?







----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Unrestricted-Secure Usenet News==----
http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups
----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =----

Frank Gilliland wrote:
On 28 Dec 2005 01:06:25 -0800, "Major Dud" wrote in
. com:


Frank Gilliland wrote:
On Wed, 28 Dec 2005 00:12:07 -0500, Mark Morgan in a faked screen name wrote in
:

or perhaps with his track history try to tell he said nothing of the
sort he still maintinas that threatening to shoot me in illioipolis
was not a threat

I have no doubt that he will try to devise some way to justify his
hypocrisy. Want a good laugh? Crosspost those future excuses to
sci.logic.

I thought that was filled up with disgraced, court martialed
ex-Marines explaining how admitting their cowardice made it "OK"...


For example, that was a classic example of Argumentum ad Hominem of
the abusive variety, also known as the Genetic Fallacy. According to
Copi:

"The way in which this irrelevant argument may sometimes persuade is
through the psychological process of transference. Where an attitude
of disapproval toward a person can be evoked, it may possibly tend to
overflow the strictly emotional field and become disagreement with
what that person says. But this connection is only psychololgical, not
logical. Even the most wicked of men may sometimes tell the truth or
argue correctly."


Steve "Yellow Dog" Robeson, K4YZ


Who's your lawyer, Dud?

Steve has to go get one NOW, since Mark called his bluff.

Time for Steve to actually start writing checks.

Then Mark counter sues, and sends another package of harassment (raped
an old friend) to the Tennessee Nursing Board.

Steve writes more checks in an attempt to use the courts to cover up
his mistakes.

wrote:
Frank Gilliland wrote:
On 28 Dec 2005 01:06:25 -0800, "Major Dud" wrote in
. com:

cut

Steve "Yellow Dog" Robeson, K4YZ


Who's your lawyer, Dud?

Steve has to go get one NOW, since Mark called his bluff.

Time for Steve to actually start writing checks.

Then Mark counter sues, and sends another package of harassment (raped
an old friend) to the Tennessee Nursing Board.

Steve writes more checks in an attempt to use the courts to cover up
his mistakes.

looks like we see his next tricks

some likely bad forgeries and more abusive posts

at least he isn't making more last warnings