Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
wrote:
From: on Sun, Jan 1 2006 7:24 am K0HB wrote: wrote Len would probably recognize it. Len does homebrew QRO? Don't know. Nope. No QRO and no HRO or DRO or PLO. I've used commercial wideband high-power VHF amplifiers for testing in professional work. Smaller than shown in the photo. What does it matter what you've used professionally that you didn't build, Len? But the 3cx10,000a7? Hardly amateurish. Probably more in the domain of professionals. Sounds rather ILLEGAL to me if "used on 80m" as claimed by the seller. What would be illegal about using such an amp on 80m? Not something that HRO or even Henry Radio would feature in catalogs ("call or write for details and prices"). Pro stuff, probably intended for something rather different than pure communications. From the looks of the exhaust vent in the E-bay photo, I'd say that it should be about a 10-gallon RF output thing, quite out of the amateur legal limits. That doesn't mean that it is run above the legal amateur power limits. It only means that it could be. Besides, it doesn't have enough knobbies on it to "qualify" for an amateur radio transmitter on "the bands" (HF). A linear amplifier isn't a transmitter, Len. It amplifies the output of a tranmitter or tranceiver. :-) :-) Dave K8MN |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() wrote: From: on Sun, Jan 1 2006 7:24 am K0HB wrote: wrote Len would probably recognize it. Len does homebrew QRO? Don't know. Nope. No QRO and no HRO or DRO or PLO. I've used commercial wideband high-power VHF amplifiers for testing in professional work. Smaller than shown in the photo. But the 3cx10,000a7? Hardly amateurish. Probably more in the domain of professionals. Sounds rather ILLEGAL to me if "used on 80m" as claimed by the seller. Not something that HRO or even Henry Radio would feature in catalogs ("call or write for details and prices"). Pro stuff, probably intended for something rather different than pure communications. From the looks of the exhaust vent in the E-bay photo, I'd say that it should be about a 10-gallon RF output thing, quite out of the amateur legal limits. Besides, it doesn't have enough knobbies on it to "qualify" for an amateur radio transmitter on "the bands" (HF). Sweetums you clueless old fart, check out the ACOM 2000A "amateur" HF 2kW+ amp, not a "knobbie" in sight. Get a life. |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() wrote Sounds rather ILLEGAL to me if "used on 80m" as claimed by the seller. Nothing illegal, so long as it's used within the rules. I have a couple of different amplifiers which could easily be driven beyond 1500W out, but are perfectly legal so long as the power output rule is observed. 73, de Hans, K0HB |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
From: K0HB on Jan 2, 1:04 pm
wrote on high-power linear RF amplifier Sounds rather ILLEGAL to me if "used on 80m" as claimed by the seller. Nothing illegal, so long as it's used within the rules. That's the crux of the whole thing, isn't it? "Legality." :-) I have a couple of different amplifiers which could easily be driven beyond 1500W out, but are perfectly legal so long as the power output rule is observed. ...and just who checks your "legal status" in operating? Oh, my, there's LOTS of different "technical" regulations in Part 97, Title 47 C.F.R., aren't there? The same can be said of Citizens Band Radio Service. It was "okay" once and legal to have a linear amplifier connected to a CB transmitter provided one did not exceed the regulatory limits found in Part 95, Title 47 C.F.R. Uh huh... :-) A company called General Radiotelephone once operated in Burbank, CA, on Magnolia Blvd a few blocks from Hollywood Way. They had - once - a cramped, busy assembly line operation going on the second floor of one building on the north side of Magnolia Blvd. Their major product was a CB transceiver which was ready to increase its power output from 5 to 35 Watts (by removing a jumper) "if and when the FCC allows a power output change." It SOLD in quantity with that "feature." The company planned to expand in the near future and had put up most of a triangle tower for their CB antenna...tower still visible half- erected on the roof today. Of course the FCC never did increase CB power output. The offshore import CB rigs arrived to undercut their prices and they went Chapter something and quit the business. [no, I didn't have one of those General Radiotelephone rigs, but they were in my vicinity and I was up on their second floor factory] Now and for some years there has been a legal no-no on even being able to PURCHASE a linear amplifier in a certain frequency range...which could be used for a CB radio...or a 10m amateur radio. Can you connect the dots and see a trend for the future there? If someone has a 10 KW linear that covers all of "the bands" (HF) then it is tempting both faith and human nature to say that a legally-licensed (certificated, tested, got their legal license in the nave of the Church of St.Hiram) amateur will ALWAYS OBEY THE RULES. The temptation is GREAT...just sitting there, ready to go, beside the operating position in the "shack." Of course YOU will always be scrupulously honest. [was there any doubt?] Are all the other legal amateurs just as scrupulously honest? Be honest now... |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() wrote ...and just who checks your "legal status" in operating? Me and Mr. Bird Type 43 Now and for some years there has been a legal no-no on even being able to PURCHASE a linear amplifier in a certain frequency range...which could be used for a CB radio...or a 10m amateur radio. Can you connect the dots and see a trend for the future there? A single dot does not constitute a trend. And the "legal no-no" (§97.315, §97.317) does not apply to homebrewed amplifiers, which the item in question appears to be. Amateur-to-amateur sales are also exempt. Sunuvagun! 73, de Hans, K0HB -- Lord High Liberator of the Electric Smoke |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "KØHB" wrote in message k.net... wrote ...and just who checks your "legal status" in operating? Me and Mr. Bird Type 43 Now and for some years there has been a legal no-no on even being able to PURCHASE a linear amplifier in a certain frequency range...which could be used for a CB radio...or a 10m amateur radio. Can you connect the dots and see a trend for the future there? A single dot does not constitute a trend. And the "legal no-no" (§97.315, §97.317) does not apply to homebrewed amplifiers, which the item in question appears to be. Amateur-to-amateur sales are also exempt. Sunuvagun! 73, de Hans, K0HB -- Lord High Liberator of the Electric Smoke Didn't the FCC change that in the last year or two? Since it didn't successfully keep the amplifiers off the CB band anyway, I believe they dropped that restriction. Since I have to head off to work shortly, I don't have time to look it up now but I do remember reading something on that. Dee D. Flint, N8UZE |
#8
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Dee Flint" wrote in message news ![]() And the "legal no-no" (§97.315, §97.317) does not apply to homebrewed amplifiers, which the item in question appears to be. Amateur-to-amateur sales are also exempt. Sunuvagun! 73, de Hans, K0HB -- Lord High Liberator of the Electric Smoke Didn't the FCC change that in the last year or two? Since it didn't successfully keep the amplifiers off the CB band anyway, I believe they dropped that restriction. §97.315 and §97.317 remain in effect. 73, de Hans, K0HB -- Lord High Liberator of the Electric Smoke |
#9
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "KØHB" wrote in message news ![]() "Dee Flint" wrote in message news ![]() And the "legal no-no" (§97.315, §97.317) does not apply to homebrewed amplifiers, which the item in question appears to be. Amateur-to-amateur sales are also exempt. Sunuvagun! 73, de Hans, K0HB -- Lord High Liberator of the Electric Smoke Didn't the FCC change that in the last year or two? Since it didn't successfully keep the amplifiers off the CB band anyway, I believe they dropped that restriction. §97.315 and §97.317 remain in effect. 73, de Hans, K0HB -- Lord High Liberator of the Electric Smoke Well it looks like that item (WT Docket 04-140) is still in limbo. Part of it does include changing the amplifier rules but it hasn't been implemented. Dee D. Flint, N8UZE |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|