Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() an_old_friend wrote: wrote: wrote: wrote: wrote: Jeff Hermann say use it or lose it is hogwash. Really? How much is 220-222 used in Canada? Will 222-225 be overcrowded because of the loss of 220-222? What justification can there be for hams having 5 MHz of prime VHF spectrum if those 5 MHz aren't being fully utilized? Hey clown, Brian, I'm not a "clown". not in brains opinion and not in my own But considering who and what the two of you are, that doesn't lend much credence to the act. What's with the name-calling? Are you desperate for attention? Or do you think such behavior is somehow justified because I disproved your claim? nah it is your blah sey attitude about it Nice try, Markie. A dictionary would have been better, though. you get into a lather at suggesting you neeed what you see as your BW in HF but you blithely talk about giving away VHF as if it wee nothing No one said it was nothing, but these arguments about the protection of our allocations have been going on for DECADES now yet there is is relief. The Spectrum Protection Act or some other legislation sounding like it has been in committee ump-teen times now, Markie...How many times have YOU written your representitives (in English) demanding that they pass it? I asked significant, relevant questions about the use of 220-222 MHz by Canadian hams. Try answering them - if you can. no you did not Sure he did. That you don't understand them or can't read them is not relevent. In case you didn't know, 220-225 is not worldwide exclusive amateur territory. If hams don't use it enough, why shouldn't it be reassigned to services that *will* use it? more of your lectureing attitute try to hope from clown to ###hole? What's "lectureing" about it, Markie...!??! It's a stone-cold fact. The 220-225Mhz band wound up in North American Amateur's hands for the most part as a buffer between commercial users and the Armed Forces "band" from 225Mhz to 400Mhz (among other reasons). It was never meant to be an unrevokable allocation...(Not that any are...) That we've kept it this long has been nothing short of a miracle. Steve, K4YZ |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() On 17 Jan 2006 06:36:01 -0800, K4YZ wrote: The 220-225Mhz band wound up in North American Amateur's hands for the most part as a buffer between commercial users and the Armed Forces "band" from 225Mhz to 400Mhz (among other reasons). It was never meant to be an unrevokable allocation...(Not that any are...) That we've kept it this long has been nothing short of a miracle. If they loes it we shoud give them half of oeurs becaues we don't need all that much and we are theyr friends. I say give them a megahurtz from 221 too 222. |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() raped_an_old_underaged_boyfriend wrote: On 17 Jan 2006 06:36:01 -0800, K4YZ wrote: The 220-225Mhz band wound up in North American Amateur's hands for the most part as a buffer between commercial users and the Armed Forces "band" from 225Mhz to 400Mhz (among other reasons). It was never meant to be an unrevokable allocation...(Not that any are...) That we've kept it this long has been nothing short of a miracle. If they loes it we shoud give them half of oeurs becaues we don't need all that much and we are theyr friends. I say give them a megahurtz from 221 too 222. Marky, you can't even operate 2 meters worth a darn. |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() raped_an_old_underaged_boyfriend wrote: wrote: raped_an_old_underaged_boyfriend wrote: steve comited a crimnal act (anying posting If that is so, then you should get a life sentence for all of your posts, Marky. On 17 Jan 2006 06:36:01 -0800, K4YZ wrote: The 220-225Mhz band wound up in North American Amateur's hands for the most part as a buffer between commercial users and the Armed Forces "band" from 225Mhz to 400Mhz (among other reasons). It was never meant to be an unrevokable allocation...(Not that any are...) That we've kept it this long has been nothing short of a miracle. If they loes it we shoud give them half of oeurs becaues we don't need all that much and we are theyr friends. I say give them a megahurtz from 221 too 222. Marky, you can't even operate 2 meters worth a darn. I do ok I am getting to like 2m SSB more consitant than 6m SSB and queiter to operate You mean more conducing for your jamming of 2 meters. oTOH 222 is even quieter but few people on and 440 sssb i can leave on all day and still satnd the static I'm sure the "static" soothes your mentally ill mind, Marky. but still make some contact even a bit on 1.2 g Until they find out exactly whom they are talking with then you are left talking to yourself. all nice bands the range kida suck but range is being worked on by the FCC Your stupidity is never ending, is it, Marky? |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() raped_an_old_underaged_boyfriend wrote: wrote: raped_an_old_underaged_boyfriend wrote: wrote: raped_an_old_underaged_boyfriend wrote: steve comited a crimnal act (anying posting If that is so, then you should get a life sentence for all of your posts, Marky. nope since I sign my posts I am not in violation fo the law You never sign your posts, dumbass. You are in violation of the "law" yourself. You would have to have signed it, Mark C. Morgan in order to comply, but you won't do that under this or any of the other names you post under. |
#9
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() K4YZ wrote: an_old_friend wrote: wrote: raped_an_old_underaged_boyfriend wrote: On 17 Jan 2006 06:36:01 -0800, K4YZ wrote: The 220-225Mhz band wound up in North American Amateur's hands for the most part as a buffer between commercial users and the Armed Forces "band" from 225Mhz to 400Mhz (among other reasons). It was never meant to be an unrevokable allocation...(Not that any are...) That we've kept it this long has been nothing short of a miracle. If they loes it we shoud give them half of oeurs becaues we don't need all that much and we are theyr friends. I say give them a megahurtz from 221 too 222. Marky, you can't even operate 2 meters worth a darn. I do ok I am getting to like 2m SSB more consitant than 6m SSB and queiter to operate It's quieter for you because no one wants to talk to an idiot. oTOH 222 is even quieter but few people on and 440 sssb i can leave on all day and still satnd the static but still make some contact even a bit on 1.2 g You're talking to someone on 1.2 grams? Marky snorts cocaine! all nice bands the range kida suck but range is being worked on by the FCC I am wondering how it is you think the FCC has anything to do with the propagation of the bands at all...?!?! BWHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!!!!!!!! |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Kalamazoo Cuckoo' ND8V | General | |||
Once upon a time in America there came to be a giant of an organization called the American Radio Relay League (ARRL). | General | |||
New ARRL Proposal | Policy | |||
The Pool | Policy | |||
Some comments on the NCVEC petition | Policy |