LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #15   Report Post  
Old January 19th 06, 02:04 AM posted to rec.radio.amateur.policy
 
Posts: n/a
Default Policy Issue: Canadian Amateurs to Lose 220-222 MHz

From: Leo on Jan 18, 2:53 pm

On 17 Jan 2006 06:49:27 -0800, "K4YZ" wrote:

snip
...At the end of the day, I am glad I work in a US ER.


....so are we!


Heh heh heh...I wish we (down here south of you) could say
the same. :-)

So...Leo, what's the word from Canadian amateur radio on
the IC reallocation of "220?"

[not that it matters directly to me, but such an actual
subject of discussion would be preferable to the sniping and
general name-calling on personalities in here...where
every day is Boxing Day...in the literal sense of the word]

By the way, a good example of "220" in operation is the
Condor Net covering most of the length of California and
reaching into states of Nevada and Arizona. Over two
decades of operation and begun before repeater micro-
processor control was the common thing in repeater control.





 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Kalamazoo Cuckoo' ND8V GLENN B General 0 October 19th 04 03:15 AM
Once upon a time in America there came to be a giant of an organization called the American Radio Relay League (ARRL). KC8QJP General 3 October 11th 04 10:44 AM
New ARRL Proposal N2EY Policy 331 March 4th 04 12:02 AM
The Pool N2EY Policy 515 February 22nd 04 03:14 AM
Some comments on the NCVEC petition D. Stussy Policy 13 August 5th 03 04:23 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 08:24 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Radio"

 

Copyright © 2017