On 10 Jan 2006 10:18:38 -0800, "cmdr buzz corey"
wrote:

Maybe this will put the hammer down on 2test.

not likely

according a few lwayer friend of mine (we talking about this last
week)

a signature which is the requirementof the law is what ever the user
wants

to illustrate in test

if I says "lsfgjlgaselfgsadjl" is my signature then it is

_________________________________________
Usenet Zone Free Binaries Usenet Server
More than 140,000 groups
Unlimited download
http://www.usenetzone.com to open account

wrote:
On 10 Jan 2006 10:18:38 -0800, "cmdr buzz corey"

according a few lwayer friend of mine (we talking about this last
week)

Uh huh...Riiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii iight.

a signature which is the requirementof the law is what ever the user
wants

to illustrate in test

if I says "lsfgjlgaselfgsadjl" is my signature then it is

In your case, Markie, the courts will be satisfied with (and
probably would actually prefer) that you just make an "X".

Steve, K4YZ

K4YZ wrote:
wrote:
On 10 Jan 2006 10:18:38 -0800, "cmdr buzz corey"

according a few lwayer friend of mine (we talking about this last
week)

Uh huh...Riiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii iight.

right I lunch mostly on wedes with some freinds some of whom are
lawyers

a signature which is the requirementof the law is what ever the user
wants

to illustrate in test

if I says "lsfgjlgaselfgsadjl" is my signature then it is

In your case, Markie, the courts will be satisfied with (and
probably would actually prefer) that you just make an "X".

meaning all you are doing is flaming me dispite the fact every word i
have posted is a true

Steve, K4YZ

On 10 Jan 2006 12:04:50 -0800, "K4YZ" wrote:


wrote:
On 10 Jan 2006 10:18:38 -0800, "cmdr buzz corey"

according a few lwayer friend of mine (we talking about this last
week)

Uh huh...Riiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii iight.

a signature which is the requirementof the law is what ever the user
wants

to illustrate in test

if I says "lsfgjlgaselfgsadjl" is my signature then it is

In your case, Markie, the courts will be satisfied with (and
probably would actually prefer) that you just make an "X".

meaning you know I am right and you were just floaming me for fun

Steve, K4YZ

_________________________________________
Usenet Zone Free Binaries Usenet Server
More than 140,000 groups
Unlimited download
http://www.usenetzone.com to open account

K4YZ wrote:
wrote:
http://news.com.com/2102-1028_3-6022...=st.util.print

Guess this means you've got to start using your real name in your
posts, eh, Brain?

In any case, the article mentioned the likelyhood of not being
able to enforce this, however it will be interesting to see if any case
law is developed from it in the near future.

It also suggested the likelyhood that anonymous tipsters might be
detered by this law. I doubt it. However I also believe that if you
have a complaint to make, there's more strength in standing up for what
you believe in and putting your name on it rather than slinging mud
from behind anonymity.

If you don't have the strength of conviction of your own words to
put your name behind them, why make them?

73

Steve, K4YZ

Even if you use your name doesn't mean you get to stalk people, even if
you believe in stalking.