wrote:
http://news.com.com/2102-1028_3-6022...=st.util.print

Guess this means you've got to start using your real name in your
posts, eh, Brain?

In any case, the article mentioned the likelyhood of not being
able to enforce this, however it will be interesting to see if any case
law is developed from it in the near future.

It also suggested the likelyhood that anonymous tipsters might be
detered by this law. I doubt it. However I also believe that if you
have a complaint to make, there's more strength in standing up for what
you believe in and putting your name on it rather than slinging mud
from behind anonymity.

If you don't have the strength of conviction of your own words to
put your name behind them, why make them?

73

Steve, K4YZ