wrote:
On 10 Jan 2006 10:18:38 -0800, "cmdr buzz corey"

according a few lwayer friend of mine (we talking about this last
week)

Uh huh...Riiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii iight.

a signature which is the requirementof the law is what ever the user
wants

to illustrate in test

if I says "lsfgjlgaselfgsadjl" is my signature then it is

In your case, Markie, the courts will be satisfied with (and
probably would actually prefer) that you just make an "X".

Steve, K4YZ

K4YZ wrote:
wrote:
On 10 Jan 2006 10:18:38 -0800, "cmdr buzz corey"

according a few lwayer friend of mine (we talking about this last
week)

Uh huh...Riiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii iight.

right I lunch mostly on wedes with some freinds some of whom are
lawyers

a signature which is the requirementof the law is what ever the user
wants

to illustrate in test

if I says "lsfgjlgaselfgsadjl" is my signature then it is

In your case, Markie, the courts will be satisfied with (and
probably would actually prefer) that you just make an "X".

meaning all you are doing is flaming me dispite the fact every word i
have posted is a true

Steve, K4YZ

an Old friend wrote:
K4YZ wrote:
wrote:
On 10 Jan 2006 10:18:38 -0800, "cmdr buzz corey"

according a few lwayer friend of mine (we talking about this last
week)

Uh huh...Riiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii iight.

right I lunch mostly on wedes with some freinds some of whom are
lawyers

Uh huh.

Right.

a signature which is the requirementof the law is what ever the user
wants

to illustrate in test

if I says "lsfgjlgaselfgsadjl" is my signature then it is

In your case, Markie, the courts will be satisfied with (and
probably would actually prefer) that you just make an "X".

meaning all you are doing is flaming me dispite the fact every word i
have posted is a true

No...What you stated was ludicrous. Not unexpected, but ludicrous
nonetheless.

Steve, K4YZ

K4YZ wrote:
an Old friend wrote:
K4YZ wrote:
wrote:
On 10 Jan 2006 10:18:38 -0800, "cmdr buzz corey"

according a few lwayer friend of mine (we talking about this last
week)

Uh huh...Riiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii iight.

right I lunch mostly on wedes with some freinds some of whom are
lawyers

Uh huh.

Right.

a signature which is the requirementof the law is what ever the user
wants

to illustrate in test

if I says "lsfgjlgaselfgsadjl" is my signature then it is

In your case, Markie, the courts will be satisfied with (and
probably would actually prefer) that you just make an "X".

meaning all you are doing is flaming me dispite the fact every word i
have posted is a true

No...What you stated was ludicrous. Not unexpected, but ludicrous
nonetheless.

you consider the turth ludicrous? well we already knew that

Steve, K4YZ

On 10 Jan 2006 12:04:50 -0800, "K4YZ" wrote:


wrote:
On 10 Jan 2006 10:18:38 -0800, "cmdr buzz corey"

according a few lwayer friend of mine (we talking about this last
week)

Uh huh...Riiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii iight.

a signature which is the requirementof the law is what ever the user
wants

to illustrate in test

if I says "lsfgjlgaselfgsadjl" is my signature then it is

In your case, Markie, the courts will be satisfied with (and
probably would actually prefer) that you just make an "X".

meaning you know I am right and you were just floaming me for fun

Steve, K4YZ

_________________________________________
Usenet Zone Free Binaries Usenet Server
More than 140,000 groups
Unlimited download
http://www.usenetzone.com to open account

wrote:
On 10 Jan 2006 12:04:50 -0800, "K4YZ" wrote:


wrote:
On 10 Jan 2006 10:18:38 -0800, "cmdr buzz corey"

according a few lwayer friend of mine (we talking about this last
week)

Uh huh...Riiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii iight.

a signature which is the requirementof the law is what ever the user
wants

to illustrate in test

if I says "lsfgjlgaselfgsadjl" is my signature then it is

In your case, Markie, the courts will be satisfied with (and
probably would actually prefer) that you just make an "X".

meaning you know I am right and you were just floaming me for fun

"floaming" you, Markie...?!?! For fun...?!?! I don't even know
what "floaming" is, so how can I know if I am doing it for fun or not?

Steve, K4YZ

On 10 Jan 2006 13:16:48 -0800, "K4YZ" wrote:


wrote:
On 10 Jan 2006 12:04:50 -0800, "K4YZ" wrote:


wrote:
On 10 Jan 2006 10:18:38 -0800, "cmdr buzz corey"

according a few lwayer friend of mine (we talking about this last
week)

Uh huh...Riiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii iight.

a signature which is the requirementof the law is what ever the user
wants

to illustrate in test

if I says "lsfgjlgaselfgsadjl" is my signature then it is

In your case, Markie, the courts will be satisfied with (and
probably would actually prefer) that you just make an "X".

meaning you know I am right and you were just floaming me for fun

"floaming" you, Markie...?!?! For fun...?!?! I don't even know
what "floaming" is, so how can I know if I am doing it for fun or not?

you should know if you are having fun

Steve, K4YZ

_________________________________________
Usenet Zone Free Binaries Usenet Server
More than 140,000 groups
Unlimited download
http://www.usenetzone.com to open account