| Page 1 of 2 | 1 | 2 |
|
|
annoying posters
|
annoying posters
wrote: http://news.com.com/2102-1028_3-6022...=st.util.print Guess this means you've got to start using your real name in your posts, eh, Brain? In any case, the article mentioned the likelyhood of not being able to enforce this, however it will be interesting to see if any case law is developed from it in the near future. It also suggested the likelyhood that anonymous tipsters might be detered by this law. I doubt it. However I also believe that if you have a complaint to make, there's more strength in standing up for what you believe in and putting your name on it rather than slinging mud from behind anonymity. If you don't have the strength of conviction of your own words to put your name behind them, why make them? 73 Steve, K4YZ |
annoying posters
On 10 Jan 2006 04:48:30 -0800, "K4YZ" wrote:
wrote: http://news.com.com/2102-1028_3-6022...=st.util.print Guess this means you've got to start using your real name in your posts, eh, Brain? In any case, the article mentioned the likelyhood of not being able to enforce this, however it will be interesting to see if any case law is developed from it in the near future. It also suggested the likelyhood that anonymous tipsters might be detered by this law. I doubt it. However I also believe that if you have a complaint to make, there's more strength in standing up for what you believe in and putting your name on it rather than slinging mud from behind anonymity. If you don't have the strength of conviction of your own words to put your name behind them, why make them? why do you do so yourself steve? 73 Steve, K4YZ _________________________________________ Usenet Zone Free Binaries Usenet Server More than 140,000 groups Unlimited download http://www.usenetzone.com to open account |
annoying posters
On 10 Jan 2006 04:48:30 -0800, "K4YZ" wrote:
wrote: http://news.com.com/2102-1028_3-6022...=st.util.print Guess this means you've got to start using your real name in your posts, eh, Brain? he does he uses his choosen signature per the electronic ducments act (or whatever the name was fro alowing signatures over the interenet as was my sgattack sig file my signature to my post even fromt he fake email adies In any case, the article mentioned the likelyhood of not being able to enforce this, however it will be interesting to see if any case law is developed from it in the near future. it would indeed the provsion wereajoke amoug lawyers before the bill was even signed It also suggested the likelyhood that anonymous tipsters might be detered by this law. I doubt it. However I also believe that if you have a complaint to make, there's more strength in standing up for what you believe in and putting your name on it rather than slinging mud from behind anonymity. depends on ones goal of course If you don't have the strength of conviction of your own words to put your name behind them, why make them? 73 Steve, K4YZ _________________________________________ Usenet Zone Free Binaries Usenet Server More than 140,000 groups Unlimited download http://www.usenetzone.com to open account |
annoying posters
On 10 Jan 2006 08:54:39 -0800, "K4YZ" wrote:
wrote: wrote: http://news.com.com/2102-1028_3-6022...=st.util.print Guess this means you've got to start using your real name in your posts, eh, Brain? he does No, he does not. lied again I challenge you to find ONE "hot-ham-and-cheese" post wherein he's signed his name and/or callsign to it. hot ham and chees is his signature you should look the arist curently known as prince but once had to be called the arist formerly known as prince becuase he made his in to a suqigle he uses his choosen signature per the electronic ducments act (or whatever the name was fro alowing signatures over the interenet Hitting the bottle again, I see, Markie. more lies about intoxication more slader Obey the TOS of AOL steve as was my sgattack sig file my signature to my post even fromt he fake email adies As was your WHAT? read the post In any case, the article mentioned the likelyhood of not being able to enforce this, however it will be interesting to see if any case law is developed from it in the near future. it would indeed the provsion wereajoke amoug lawyers before the bill was even signed Probably. they were my lawyer freind were joking about it before the signing But then they let YOU loose on society, so there's all sorts of degrees of humor, Markie... naother lie lawyer had nothing to do with that It also suggested the likelyhood that anonymous tipsters might be detered by this law. I doubt it. However I also believe that if you have a complaint to make, there's more strength in standing up for what you believe in and putting your name on it rather than slinging mud from behind anonymity. depends on ones goal of course No, it doesn't. another lie it does indeed the you 9and others) like to create the illusion that people agree with you by making annmouse posts If you don't have the strength of conviction of your own words to put your name behind them, why make them? I reiterate the question. and censored my reply Steve, K4YZ _________________________________________ Usenet Zone Free Binaries Usenet Server More than 140,000 groups Unlimited download http://www.usenetzone.com to open account |
annoying posters
wrote: On 10 Jan 2006 08:54:39 -0800, "K4YZ" wrote: wrote: wrote: http://news.com.com/2102-1028_3-6022...=st.util.print Guess this means you've got to start using your real name in your posts, eh, Brain? he does No, he does not. lied again No, he does not. I challenge you to find ONE "hot-ham-and-cheese" post wherein he's signed his name and/or callsign to it. hot ham and chees is his signature No...it's not. It's a 'nickname'. A signature is his NAME. The one mumsy and pops gave him. Unless his parents were really insensitive, I bet his real name is NOT "hot-ham-and-cheese" you should look the arist curently known as prince but once had to be called the arist formerly known as prince becuase he made his in to a suqigle That was a publicity ploy. The courts still require his given name on all documents. he uses his choosen signature per the electronic ducments act (or whatever the name was fro alowing signatures over the interenet Hitting the bottle again, I see, Markie. more lies about intoxication Nope. more slader What's "slader"...??? Obey the TOS of AOL steve TOS me for accusing a drunk of being intoxicated, Mark...?!?! And by the way...Although I generally have my AOL server open when I post here, it's not necessary. So go ahead. Dropping (or getting dropped from) AOL wouldn't even be a speedbump. as was my sgattack sig file my signature to my post even fromt he fake email adies As was your WHAT? read the post It didn't do any good, Markie. It still says "sgattack sig file" . WTF is an "sgattack"...?!?! In any case, the article mentioned the likelyhood of not being able to enforce this, however it will be interesting to see if any case law is developed from it in the near future. it would indeed the provsion wereajoke amoug lawyers before the bill was even signed Probably. they were my lawyer freind were joking about it before the signing Yet more vowels and consonants wasted in the ether. But then they let YOU loose on society, so there's all sorts of degrees of humor, Markie... naother lie Nope. lawyer had nothing to do with that Somewhere along the way a lawyer was responsible or had some part in it. I have no doubt that your continued imposition on society is in much due to the workings of a lawyer. It also suggested the likelyhood that anonymous tipsters might be detered by this law. I doubt it. However I also believe that if you have a complaint to make, there's more strength in standing up for what you believe in and putting your name on it rather than slinging mud from behind anonymity. depends on ones goal of course No, it doesn't. another lie Nope. it does indeed Nope. the you 9and others) like to create the illusion that people agree with you by making annmouse posts I don't create anything, Markie. I respond to your posts either with " or " In either case, I always "sign" the bottom of the post with "Steve, K4YZ" I don't create bogus "posters", nor do I ask for or encourage them. Tough for you to accept, I know. but so far, with the exception of Frankie (a twice-disgraced court martialed ex-serviceman) and Brain, (himself archived as being decitful, dishonest and untrustworthy), there's really NO support for you or your campaign in this forum. Indeed, even when you SPECIFICALLY addressed your "colleagues" of your intent to try and sanction my Nursing license and your request for them to participate, they each told you "NO", in no uncertain terms. Some friends. And those few words of "support" for me here by both known and unknown sources has been unsolicited, either in public or private. If you don't have the strength of conviction of your own words to put your name behind them, why make them? I reiterate the question. and censored my reply No, I did not. Steve, K4YZ |
annoying posters
Maybe this will put the hammer down on 2test.
|
annoying posters
On 10 Jan 2006 10:18:38 -0800, "cmdr buzz corey"
wrote: Maybe this will put the hammer down on 2test. not likely according a few lwayer friend of mine (we talking about this last week) a signature which is the requirementof the law is what ever the user wants to illustrate in test if I says "lsfgjlgaselfgsadjl" is my signature then it is _________________________________________ Usenet Zone Free Binaries Usenet Server More than 140,000 groups Unlimited download http://www.usenetzone.com to open account |
annoying posters...Like Markie Morgan
wrote: On 10 Jan 2006 10:18:38 -0800, "cmdr buzz corey" according a few lwayer friend of mine (we talking about this last week) Uh huh...Riiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii iight. a signature which is the requirementof the law is what ever the user wants to illustrate in test if I says "lsfgjlgaselfgsadjl" is my signature then it is In your case, Markie, the courts will be satisfied with (and probably would actually prefer) that you just make an "X". Steve, K4YZ |
annoying posters...
K4YZ wrote: wrote: On 10 Jan 2006 10:18:38 -0800, "cmdr buzz corey" according a few lwayer friend of mine (we talking about this last week) Uh huh...Riiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii iight. right I lunch mostly on wedes with some freinds some of whom are lawyers a signature which is the requirementof the law is what ever the user wants to illustrate in test if I says "lsfgjlgaselfgsadjl" is my signature then it is In your case, Markie, the courts will be satisfied with (and probably would actually prefer) that you just make an "X". meaning all you are doing is flaming me dispite the fact every word i have posted is a true Steve, K4YZ |
annoying posters...
an Old friend wrote: K4YZ wrote: wrote: On 10 Jan 2006 10:18:38 -0800, "cmdr buzz corey" according a few lwayer friend of mine (we talking about this last week) Uh huh...Riiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii iight. right I lunch mostly on wedes with some freinds some of whom are lawyers Uh huh. Right. a signature which is the requirementof the law is what ever the user wants to illustrate in test if I says "lsfgjlgaselfgsadjl" is my signature then it is In your case, Markie, the courts will be satisfied with (and probably would actually prefer) that you just make an "X". meaning all you are doing is flaming me dispite the fact every word i have posted is a true No...What you stated was ludicrous. Not unexpected, but ludicrous nonetheless. Steve, K4YZ |
annoying posters...
K4YZ wrote: an Old friend wrote: K4YZ wrote: wrote: On 10 Jan 2006 10:18:38 -0800, "cmdr buzz corey" according a few lwayer friend of mine (we talking about this last week) Uh huh...Riiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii iight. right I lunch mostly on wedes with some freinds some of whom are lawyers Uh huh. Right. a signature which is the requirementof the law is what ever the user wants to illustrate in test if I says "lsfgjlgaselfgsadjl" is my signature then it is In your case, Markie, the courts will be satisfied with (and probably would actually prefer) that you just make an "X". meaning all you are doing is flaming me dispite the fact every word i have posted is a true No...What you stated was ludicrous. Not unexpected, but ludicrous nonetheless. you consider the turth ludicrous? well we already knew that Steve, K4YZ |
flame for no reason the trademark of the asshole of rrap
On 10 Jan 2006 12:04:50 -0800, "K4YZ" wrote:
wrote: On 10 Jan 2006 10:18:38 -0800, "cmdr buzz corey" according a few lwayer friend of mine (we talking about this last week) Uh huh...Riiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii iight. a signature which is the requirementof the law is what ever the user wants to illustrate in test if I says "lsfgjlgaselfgsadjl" is my signature then it is In your case, Markie, the courts will be satisfied with (and probably would actually prefer) that you just make an "X". meaning you know I am right and you were just floaming me for fun Steve, K4YZ _________________________________________ Usenet Zone Free Binaries Usenet Server More than 140,000 groups Unlimited download http://www.usenetzone.com to open account |
More Markie Mularkie
|
steve clams notto know what fun it
On 10 Jan 2006 13:16:48 -0800, "K4YZ" wrote:
wrote: On 10 Jan 2006 12:04:50 -0800, "K4YZ" wrote: wrote: On 10 Jan 2006 10:18:38 -0800, "cmdr buzz corey" according a few lwayer friend of mine (we talking about this last week) Uh huh...Riiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii iight. a signature which is the requirementof the law is what ever the user wants to illustrate in test if I says "lsfgjlgaselfgsadjl" is my signature then it is In your case, Markie, the courts will be satisfied with (and probably would actually prefer) that you just make an "X". meaning you know I am right and you were just floaming me for fun "floaming" you, Markie...?!?! For fun...?!?! I don't even know what "floaming" is, so how can I know if I am doing it for fun or not? you should know if you are having fun Steve, K4YZ _________________________________________ Usenet Zone Free Binaries Usenet Server More than 140,000 groups Unlimited download http://www.usenetzone.com to open account |
annoying posters
K4YZ wrote: wrote: http://news.com.com/2102-1028_3-6022...=st.util.print Guess this means you've got to start using your real name in your posts, eh, Brain? In any case, the article mentioned the likelyhood of not being able to enforce this, however it will be interesting to see if any case law is developed from it in the near future. It also suggested the likelyhood that anonymous tipsters might be detered by this law. I doubt it. However I also believe that if you have a complaint to make, there's more strength in standing up for what you believe in and putting your name on it rather than slinging mud from behind anonymity. If you don't have the strength of conviction of your own words to put your name behind them, why make them? 73 Steve, K4YZ Even if you use your name doesn't mean you get to stalk people, even if you believe in stalking. |
annoying posters
K4YZ wrote: wrote: wrote: http://news.com.com/2102-1028_3-6022...=st.util.print Guess this means you've got to start using your real name in your posts, eh, Brain? he does No, he does not. I challenge you to find ONE "hot-ham-and-cheese" post wherein he's signed his name and/or callsign to it. A callsign is not a name. MARS is not Amateur Radio. |
annoying posters
K4YZ wrote: No...it's not. It's a 'nickname'. No. It isn't. It's an alias. A signature is his NAME. No. It isn't. My name appears in many places where it is not a signature. The one mumsy and pops gave him. My parents did not give me a signature. I had to develop that on my own. Unless his parents were really insensitive, I bet his real name is NOT "hot-ham-and-cheese" At least my parents spell my name correctly. you should look the arist curently known as prince but once had to be called the arist formerly known as prince becuase he made his in to a suqigle That was a publicity ploy. The courts still require his given name on all documents. No. They don't. A legal alias or "doing business as" allows an alias to be used legally. Sonovagun! I respond to your posts either with " or " No. You don't. You responded under your boy friend's account. Once. |
Hey Steve, any more bad info for RRAP? was: annoying posters
|
annoying posters
wrote: K4YZ wrote: wrote: wrote: http://news.com.com/2102-1028_3-6022...=st.util.print Guess this means you've got to start using your real name in your posts, eh, Brain? he does No, he does not. I challenge you to find ONE "hot-ham-and-cheese" post wherein he's signed his name and/or callsign to it. A callsign is not a name. MARS is not Amateur Radio. Only one person holds any one particular callsign, ergo it's far more individual than a name. There's only one N0IMD, however I know a half dozen "Brian's" And MARS does not exist without Amateur Radio. Don't know why you brought that in, but there ya go. We don't call ya "Brain" for nothing! Steve, K4YZ |
annoying posters
|
annoying posters
On 11 Jan 2006 13:50:08 -0800, "K4YZ" wrote:
wrote: K4YZ wrote: I respond to your posts either with " or " No. You don't. You responded under your boy friend's account. Once. There ya go. Another BrainieLie. weher you have lied you have also posted at steve Brian P Burke, N0IMD, "hot-ham-and-cheese" perpetuates his mistruthfulness. Steve, K4YZ _________________________________________ Usenet Zone Free Binaries Usenet Server More than 140,000 groups Unlimited download http://www.usenetzone.com to open account |
annoying posters
On 11 Jan 2006 13:47:25 -0800, "K4YZ" wrote:
wrote: K4YZ wrote: wrote: wrote: http://news.com.com/2102-1028_3-6022...=st.util.print Guess this means you've got to start using your real name in your posts, eh, Brain? he does No, he does not. I challenge you to find ONE "hot-ham-and-cheese" post wherein he's signed his name and/or callsign to it. A callsign is not a name. MARS is not Amateur Radio. Only one person holds any one particular callsign, ergo it's far more individual than a name. but it is not a name _________________________________________ Usenet Zone Free Binaries Usenet Server More than 140,000 groups Unlimited download http://www.usenetzone.com to open account |
annoying posters
K4YZ wrote: wrote: K4YZ wrote: wrote: wrote: http://news.com.com/2102-1028_3-6022...=st.util.print Guess this means you've got to start using your real name in your posts, eh, Brain? he does No, he does not. I challenge you to find ONE "hot-ham-and-cheese" post wherein he's signed his name and/or callsign to it. A callsign is not a name. MARS is not Amateur Radio. Only one person holds any one particular callsign, ergo it's far more individual than a name. There's only one N0IMD, however I know a half dozen "Brian's" And yet a callsign is STILL not a name. And MARS does not exist without Amateur Radio. Don't know why you brought that in, but there ya go. We don't call ya "Brain" for nothing! Steve, K4YZ And yet MARS is STILL not amateur radio. What? Don't want to try explaining the difference between a name and a signature? Three strikes and you're out. |
annoying posters
|
steve rants on out of control
On 13 Jan 2006 08:34:12 -0800, "K4YZ" wrote:
wrote: K4YZ wrote: Only one person holds any one particular callsign, ergo it's far more individual than a name. There's only one N0IMD, however I know a half dozen "Brian's" And yet a callsign is STILL not a name. And in THIS forum it would be far more representitive than a name. There can be many Steve's, but only one K4YZ. thank the gods there can be only one of you but if you can't control yourself eneough to deal the the facts then flsuh _________________________________________ Usenet Zone Free Binaries Usenet Server More than 140,000 groups Unlimited download http://www.usenetzone.com to open account |
annoying posters
K4YZ wrote: wrote: K4YZ wrote: Only one person holds any one particular callsign, ergo it's far more individual than a name. There's only one N0IMD, however I know a half dozen "Brian's" And yet a callsign is STILL not a name. And in THIS forum it would be far more representitive than a name. There can be many Steve's, but only one K4YZ. There are many Steves. Anyone who has been here long enough knows that. Hi! And MARS does not exist without Amateur Radio. Don't know why you brought that in, but there ya go. We don't call ya "Brain" for nothing! And yet MARS is STILL not amateur radio. You keep repeating this and you look as stupid now as you did the first time you said it Brain. Just can't get enough yolk on the noggin', eh...?!?!? And yet MARS is STILL not amateur radio. No matter how badly you wish it were so. What? Don't want to try explaining the difference between a name and a signature? Three strikes and you're out. You're not even up to bat yet, Brainie! Steve, K4YZ You're out. |
annoying posters
wrote: K4YZ wrote: wrote: K4YZ wrote: Only one person holds any one particular callsign, ergo it's far more individual than a name. There's only one N0IMD, however I know a half dozen "Brian's" And yet a callsign is STILL not a name. And in THIS forum it would be far more representitive than a name. There can be many Steve's, but only one K4YZ. There are many Steves. Anyone who has been here long enough knows that. Hi! Laughing at yourself agreeing with me, Brain? And MARS does not exist without Amateur Radio. Don't know why you brought that in, but there ya go. We don't call ya "Brain" for nothing! And yet MARS is STILL not amateur radio. You keep repeating this and you look as stupid now as you did the first time you said it Brain. Just can't get enough yolk on the noggin', eh...?!?!? And yet MARS is STILL not amateur radio. No matter how badly you wish it were so. Hey Brain...Recognize these words..?!?! QUOTE: Thanks to your fueding with every-damned-body, there very, very little room for actual civil discussion. Thanks a lot. UNQUOTE Guess who? It's the same guy who keeps trying to quote four words out of context and make it the entire "focus" of his debate about the relationship between MARS and Amateur Radio. Need a hint? What? Don't want to try explaining the difference between a name and a signature? Three strikes and you're out. You're not even up to bat yet, Brainie! You're out. Not with you "pitching", I'm not. Steve, K4YZ |
annoying posters
K4YZ wrote: wrote: K4YZ wrote: wrote: K4YZ wrote: Only one person holds any one particular callsign, ergo it's far more individual than a name. There's only one N0IMD, however I know a half dozen "Brian's" And yet a callsign is STILL not a name. And in THIS forum it would be far more representitive than a name. There can be many Steve's, but only one K4YZ. There are many Steves. Anyone who has been here long enough knows that. Hi! Laughing at yourself agreeing with me, Brain? Agreeing with you more than you appear to realize. Hi, hi! And MARS does not exist without Amateur Radio. Don't know why you brought that in, but there ya go. We don't call ya "Brain" for nothing! And yet MARS is STILL not amateur radio. You keep repeating this and you look as stupid now as you did the first time you said it Brain. Just can't get enough yolk on the noggin', eh...?!?!? And yet MARS is STILL not amateur radio. No matter how badly you wish it were so. Hey Brain...Recognize these words..?!?! QUOTE: Thanks to your fueding with every-damned-body, there very, very little room for actual civil discussion. Thanks a lot. UNQUOTE Guess who? It's the same guy who keeps trying to quote four words out of context and make it the entire "focus" of his debate about the relationship between MARS and Amateur Radio. Need a hint? It took you many, many subsequent postings to backpedal and develop a rationale for your idiotic claims. Your claims are still wrong. What? Don't want to try explaining the difference between a name and a signature? Three strikes and you're out. You're not even up to bat yet, Brainie! You're out. Not with you "pitching", I'm not. Steve, K4YZ Maybe you'll get traded so you can compete in a leage more to your abilities. |
annoying posters
wrote: K4YZ wrote: wrote: K4YZ wrote: wrote: K4YZ wrote: Only one person holds any one particular callsign, ergo it's far more individual than a name. There's only one N0IMD, however I know a half dozen "Brian's" And yet a callsign is STILL not a name. And in THIS forum it would be far more representitive than a name. There can be many Steve's, but only one K4YZ. There are many Steves. Anyone who has been here long enough knows that. Hi! Laughing at yourself agreeing with me, Brain? Agreeing with you more than you appear to realize. Hi, hi! And MARS does not exist without Amateur Radio. Don't know why you brought that in, but there ya go. We don't call ya "Brain" for nothing! And yet MARS is STILL not amateur radio. You keep repeating this and you look as stupid now as you did the first time you said it Brain. Just can't get enough yolk on the noggin', eh...?!?!? And yet MARS is STILL not amateur radio. No matter how badly you wish it were so. Hey Brain...Recognize these words..?!?! QUOTE: Thanks to your fueding with every-damned-body, there very, very little room for actual civil discussion. Thanks a lot. UNQUOTE Guess who? It's the same guy who keeps trying to quote four words out of context and make it the entire "focus" of his debate about the relationship between MARS and Amateur Radio. Need a hint? It took you many, many subsequent postings to backpedal and develop a rationale for your idiotic claims. Your claims are still wrong. What? Don't want to try explaining the difference between a name and a signature? Three strikes and you're out. You're not even up to bat yet, Brainie! You're out. Not with you "pitching", I'm not. Steve, K4YZ Maybe you'll get traded so you can compete in a leage more to your abilities. No response? Yep, Steve must have got traded to the minors. |
annoying posters
On 16 Jan 2006 16:03:15 -0800, wrote:
wrote: K4YZ wrote: wrote: K4YZ wrote: wrote: K4YZ wrote: Only one person holds any one particular callsign, ergo it's far more individual than a name. There's only one N0IMD, however I know a half dozen "Brian's" And yet a callsign is STILL not a name. And in THIS forum it would be far more representitive than a name. There can be many Steve's, but only one K4YZ. There are many Steves. Anyone who has been here long enough knows that. Hi! Laughing at yourself agreeing with me, Brain? Agreeing with you more than you appear to realize. Hi, hi! And MARS does not exist without Amateur Radio. Don't know why you brought that in, but there ya go. We don't call ya "Brain" for nothing! And yet MARS is STILL not amateur radio. You keep repeating this and you look as stupid now as you did the first time you said it Brain. Just can't get enough yolk on the noggin', eh...?!?!? And yet MARS is STILL not amateur radio. No matter how badly you wish it were so. Hey Brain...Recognize these words..?!?! QUOTE: Thanks to your fueding with every-damned-body, there very, very little room for actual civil discussion. Thanks a lot. UNQUOTE Guess who? It's the same guy who keeps trying to quote four words out of context and make it the entire "focus" of his debate about the relationship between MARS and Amateur Radio. Need a hint? It took you many, many subsequent postings to backpedal and develop a rationale for your idiotic claims. Your claims are still wrong. What? Don't want to try explaining the difference between a name and a signature? Three strikes and you're out. You're not even up to bat yet, Brainie! You're out. Not with you "pitching", I'm not. Steve, K4YZ Maybe you'll get traded so you can compete in a leage more to your abilities. No response? Yep, Steve must have got traded to the minors. nah more likely cut alltogether _________________________________________ Usenet Zone Free Binaries Usenet Server More than 140,000 groups Unlimited download http://www.usenetzone.com to open account |
More Markie Mularkie
wrote: K4YZ wrote: wrote: K4YZ wrote: wrote: K4YZ wrote: Only one person holds any one particular callsign, ergo it's far more individual than a name. There's only one N0IMD, however I know a half dozen "Brian's" And yet a callsign is STILL not a name. And in THIS forum it would be far more representitive than a name. There can be many Steve's, but only one K4YZ. There are many Steves. Anyone who has been here long enough knows that. Hi! Laughing at yourself agreeing with me, Brain? Agreeing with you more than you appear to realize. Hi, hi! And MARS does not exist without Amateur Radio. Don't know why you brought that in, but there ya go. We don't call ya "Brain" for nothing! And yet MARS is STILL not amateur radio. You keep repeating this and you look as stupid now as you did the first time you said it Brain. Just can't get enough yolk on the noggin', eh...?!?!? And yet MARS is STILL not amateur radio. No matter how badly you wish it were so. Hey Brain...Recognize these words..?!?! QUOTE: Thanks to your fueding with every-damned-body, there very, very little room for actual civil discussion. Thanks a lot. UNQUOTE Guess who? It's the same guy who keeps trying to quote four words out of context and make it the entire "focus" of his debate about the relationship between MARS and Amateur Radio. Need a hint? It took you many, many subsequent postings to backpedal and develop a rationale for your idiotic claims. Your claims are still wrong. Nope. YOUR attempts to use them out of context are, though. Maybe you'll get traded so you can compete in a leage more to your abilities. What's a "leage"...?!?!? Steve, K4YZ |
annoying posters
wrote: On 16 Jan 2006 16:03:15 -0800, wrote: wrote: K4YZ wrote: wrote: K4YZ wrote: wrote: K4YZ wrote: Only one person holds any one particular callsign, ergo it's far more individual than a name. There's only one N0IMD, however I know a half dozen "Brian's" And yet a callsign is STILL not a name. And in THIS forum it would be far more representitive than a name. There can be many Steve's, but only one K4YZ. There are many Steves. Anyone who has been here long enough knows that. Hi! Laughing at yourself agreeing with me, Brain? Agreeing with you more than you appear to realize. Hi, hi! And MARS does not exist without Amateur Radio. Don't know why you brought that in, but there ya go. We don't call ya "Brain" for nothing! And yet MARS is STILL not amateur radio. You keep repeating this and you look as stupid now as you did the first time you said it Brain. Just can't get enough yolk on the noggin', eh...?!?!? And yet MARS is STILL not amateur radio. No matter how badly you wish it were so. Hey Brain...Recognize these words..?!?! QUOTE: Thanks to your fueding with every-damned-body, there very, very little room for actual civil discussion. Thanks a lot. UNQUOTE Guess who? It's the same guy who keeps trying to quote four words out of context and make it the entire "focus" of his debate about the relationship between MARS and Amateur Radio. Need a hint? It took you many, many subsequent postings to backpedal and develop a rationale for your idiotic claims. Your claims are still wrong. What? Don't want to try explaining the difference between a name and a signature? Three strikes and you're out. You're not even up to bat yet, Brainie! You're out. Not with you "pitching", I'm not. Steve, K4YZ Maybe you'll get traded so you can compete in a leage more to your abilities. No response? Yep, Steve must have got traded to the minors. nah more likely cut alltogether you aer realy spidu. |
annoying posters
On 17 Jan 2006 07:10:36 -0800, wrote:
wrote: On 16 Jan 2006 16:03:15 -0800, wrote: cut Steve, K4YZ Maybe you'll get traded so you can compete in a leage more to your abilities. No response? Yep, Steve must have got traded to the minors. nah more likely cut alltogether you aer realy spidu. ah yes one the folks the law wcan be used against _________________________________________ Usenet Zone Free Binaries Usenet Server More than 140,000 groups Unlimited download http://www.usenetzone.com to open account |
annoying posters
wrote: On 17 Jan 2006 07:10:36 -0800, wrote: wrote: On 16 Jan 2006 16:03:15 -0800, wrote: cut Steve, K4YZ Maybe you'll get traded so you can compete in a leage more to your abilities. No response? Yep, Steve must have got traded to the minors. nah more likely cut alltogether you aer realy spidu. ah yes one the folks the law wcan be used against Waht lwa is thta, dubmass Marky? |
annoying posters
wrote: wrote: On 17 Jan 2006 07:10:36 -0800, wrote: cut ah yes one the folks the law wcan be used against Waht lwa is thta, dubmass Marky? the law that is the subject of this thread a link to the mataerila was providedby the origanl poster if you are googles scroll up to the top then if need be click on the lnk to old posts till you get back to the begining |
annoying posters
On 17 Jan 2006 11:31:27 -0800, wrote:
wrote: On 17 Jan 2006 07:10:36 -0800, wrote: wrote: On 16 Jan 2006 16:03:15 -0800, wrote: cut Steve, K4YZ Maybe you'll get traded so you can compete in a leage more to your abilities. No response? Yep, Steve must have got traded to the minors. nah more likely cut alltogether you aer realy spidu. ah yes one the folks the law wcan be used against Waht lwa is thta, dubmass Marky? found the link for you http://news.com.com/2102-1028_3-6022...=st.util.print _________________________________________ Usenet Zone Free Binaries Usenet Server More than 140,000 groups Unlimited download http://www.usenetzone.com to open account |
More Markie Mualrkie
wrote: On 17 Jan 2006 11:31:27 -0800, wrote: wrote: On 17 Jan 2006 07:10:36 -0800, wrote: wrote: On 16 Jan 2006 16:03:15 -0800, wrote: cut Steve, K4YZ Maybe you'll get traded so you can compete in a leage more to your abilities. No response? Yep, Steve must have got traded to the minors. nah more likely cut alltogether you aer realy spidu. ah yes one the folks the law wcan be used against Waht lwa is thta, dubmass Marky? found the link for you http://news.com.com/2102-1028_3-6022...=st.util.print Better read it thoroughly, Markie...Especially next time you readdress a thread with profanities. Steve, K4YZ |
annoying posters
raped_an_old_underaged_boyfriend wrote: wrote: wrote: On 17 Jan 2006 07:10:36 -0800, wrote: cut Run away, Marky! ah yes one the folks the law wcan be used against Waht lwa is thta, dubmass Marky? the law that is the subject of this thread a link to the mataerila was providedby the origanl poster Except that ther law refers to unwanted e-mails, not usenet posts, dumbass. if you are googles scroll up to the top then if need be click on the lnk to old posts till you get back to the begining Learn to read, stupid. |
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 08:05 PM. |
|
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
RadioBanter.com