On Tue, 17 Jan 2006 05:00:11 GMT, Dave Heil
wrote:

wrote:
On Tue, 17 Jan 2006 04:30:44 GMT, Dave Heil
wrote:

wrote:
On Tue, 17 Jan 2006 01:27:18 GMT, Dave Heil
wrote:

wrote:
On Tue, 17 Jan 2006 00:38:51 GMT, Dave Heil
wrote:

an old friend wrote:
Dave Heil wrote:
wrote:
On 16 Jan 2006 05:01:14 -0800, "K4YZ" wrote:
cut
then denied doing ti

that is a lie
It should be easy for you to clear up your "stament". Provide the context.
not my job to fix your mess
That's funny--that is exactly how I feel about your word-jumble postings.
you may feel that that way but I am the one telling the truth
That's odd. I'm telling the truth too.
never said otherwise
It isn't my job to fix your
mess.
then don't dod it
I din't, I din't dood it.

fine
If you can't write what you mean to convey, it isn't my problem.
never said it was, unless you want to understand it then it become
your problem
Sorry, Einstein, it doesn't work that way.

but it does work that way

No, it assuredly does not.
yes it does
If you can't communicate with those who can
read the language, then the problem is all yours.
only if I care about comuicating with you
You may have
something brilliant to say, but we'll never know.

gee those that want are able to figure it out

if you were polite about ever I might be willing to help you but as it
is..

Dave K8MN

_________________________________________
Usenet Zone Free Binaries Usenet Server
More than 140,000 groups
Unlimited download
http://www.usenetzone.com to open account

wrote:
On Tue, 17 Jan 2006 05:00:11 GMT, Dave Heil
wrote:

wrote:
On Tue, 17 Jan 2006 04:30:44 GMT, Dave Heil
wrote:

wrote:
On Tue, 17 Jan 2006 01:27:18 GMT, Dave Heil
wrote:

wrote:
On Tue, 17 Jan 2006 00:38:51 GMT, Dave Heil
wrote:

an old friend wrote:
Dave Heil wrote:
wrote:
On 16 Jan 2006 05:01:14 -0800, "K4YZ" wrote:
cut
then denied doing ti

that is a lie
It should be easy for you to clear up your "stament". Provide the context.
not my job to fix your mess
That's funny--that is exactly how I feel about your word-jumble postings.
you may feel that that way but I am the one telling the truth
That's odd. I'm telling the truth too.
never said otherwise
It isn't my job to fix your
mess.
then don't dod it
I din't, I din't dood it.
fine
If you can't write what you mean to convey, it isn't my problem.
never said it was, unless you want to understand it then it become
your problem

Sorry, Einstein, it doesn't work that way.

but it does work that way

No, it assuredly does not.

yes it does

I made it perfectly clear that it does not.

If you can't communicate with those who can
read the language, then the problem is all yours.

only if I care about comuicating with you

If you don't care about "comuicating", you're certainly wasting a large
part of your already pathetic life.

You may have
something brilliant to say, but we'll never know.

gee those that want are able to figure it out

Like "ty"?

if you were polite about ever I might be willing to help you but as it
is..

Don't go overboard on my account. Trust me, if you ever say anything
worth reading, it'll probably make Fox News.

Dave K8MN

Dave Heil wrote:
wrote:
On Tue, 17 Jan 2006 05:00:11 GMT, Dave Heil
wrote:

cut
then don't dod it
I din't, I din't dood it.
fine
If you can't write what you mean to convey, it isn't my problem.
never said it was, unless you want to understand it then it become
your problem

Sorry, Einstein, it doesn't work that way.

but it does work that way

No, it assuredly does not.

yes it does

I made it perfectly clear that it does not.

but you are worng of course

I decide what serves my ends not you

If you can't communicate with those who can
read the language, then the problem is all yours.

only if I care about comuicating with you

If you don't care about "comuicating",
again you decided to lie about the statement I said comicating with YOU
alter the stament and render the answer meaningless

what was I telling you about context earlier

I a quie convinced you can't ynderstnad muuch of anything I say or that
anybody else you are oposed to says. you have shown in your postsing
over the years

therefore I will spare NO effort at your will

an old friend wrote:
Dave Heil wrote:
wrote:
On Tue, 17 Jan 2006 05:00:11 GMT, Dave Heil
wrote:

cut
then don't dod it
I din't, I din't dood it.
fine
If you can't write what you mean to convey, it isn't my problem.
never said it was, unless you want to understand it then it become
your problem
Sorry, Einstein, it doesn't work that way.
but it does work that way
No, it assuredly does not.
yes it does
I made it perfectly clear that it does not.

but you are worng of course

I might be "worng", but I'm not wrong.

I decide what serves my ends not you

That's simply too much information.

If you can't communicate with those who can
read the language, then the problem is all yours.

only if I care about comuicating with you

If you don't care about "comuicating",

again you decided to lie about the statement I said comicating with YOU

You are a complete twit.

alter the stament and render the answer meaningless

You've not come up with an answer. Why does a "stament" even need an
answer?

what was I telling you about context earlier

Nothing important.

I a quie convinced you can't ynderstnad muuch of anything I say or that
anybody else you are oposed to says.

Well, there you have it. I a quie sure that nobody ynderstnad muuch of
anything you say.

...you have shown in your postsing
over the years

I've done absolutely no postsing at any time.

therefore I will spare NO effort at your will

Really? Then hop to it.


Dave K8MN

Dave Heil wrote:
an old friend wrote:
Dave Heil wrote:
wrote:
On Tue, 17 Jan 2006 05:00:11 GMT, Dave Heil
wrote:

cut
then don't dod it
I din't, I din't dood it.
fine
If you can't write what you mean to convey, it isn't my problem.
never said it was, unless you want to understand it then it become
your problem
Sorry, Einstein, it doesn't work that way.
but it does work that way
No, it assuredly does not.
yes it does
I made it perfectly clear that it does not.

but you are worng of course

I might be "worng", but I'm not wrong.

you certianly are

I decide what serves my ends not you

That's simply too much information.
then I will spare furth till you post again

an old friend wrote:
Dave Heil wrote:
an old friend wrote:
Dave Heil wrote:
wrote:
On Tue, 17 Jan 2006 05:00:11 GMT, Dave Heil
wrote:

cut
then don't dod it
I din't, I din't dood it.
fine
If you can't write what you mean to convey, it isn't my problem.
never said it was, unless you want to understand it then it become
your problem
Sorry, Einstein, it doesn't work that way.
but it does work that way
No, it assuredly does not.
yes it does
I made it perfectly clear that it does not.
but you are worng of course
I might be "worng", but I'm not wrong.

you certianly are
I decide what serves my ends not you

That's simply too much information.

then I will spare furth till you post again

Lucky Furth!

Dave K8MN

Dave Heil wrote:
an old friend wrote:
Dave Heil wrote:
an old friend wrote:
cut
yes it does
I made it perfectly clear that it does not.
but you are worng of course
I might be "worng", but I'm not wrong.

you certianly are
I decide what serves my ends not you

That's simply too much information.

then I will spare furth till you post again

Lucky Furth!

if you fancy

Dave K8MN

wrote:
On 16 Jan 2006 04:16:17 -0800, "K4YZ" wrote:

We NEVER complain when you take the time to explain, IN ENGLISH,
what it is you are trying to say.

liar

That's RIGHT, Markie...YOU are a LIAR!

Now, we can move forward!

Steve, K4YZ

K4YZ wrote:
wrote:
On 16 Jan 2006 04:16:17 -0800, "K4YZ" wrote:

We NEVER complain when you take the time to explain, IN ENGLISH,
what it is you are trying to say.

liar

That's RIGHT, Markie...YOU are a LIAR!

yes at times I am but less ofone than you or dave

Now, we can move forward!

forward where?

Steve, K4YZ

K4YZ wrote:
an old friend wrote:
K4YZ wrote:
an_old_friend wrote:
K4YZ wrote:
an_old_friend wrote:
K4YZ wrote:
an_old_friend wrote:

it was****
consortship fixed

Who were you consorting with?

you as point of fact

Uhhhhhhhh....Nope.

yep

Nope.
yep

and you seem to enjoy consorting with me here online indeed you do sem
to live for it

And now we have solid evidence that you ARE fantasizing.

nope just a reasoned analys of your action you are obsessly sexaul
obsessed with me wish I could it was flatering

Steve, K4YZ