|
More Markie Mularkie
an old friend wrote: news wrote: Isn't there a way of getting your licence without sitting for the exam.... eg... being educated in one of the following professions. electronics engineer communications technician physics professor. Sounds possible to me. the only way t get the license without the exam wouldbe to bride some VE's possible but hardly worthwhile Why would marrying a Canadian Amateur get you an American Amateur Radio license...?!?! Canadian's must take an examination too, Markie...married or otherwise! Steve, K4YZ |
More Markie Mularkie
On 16 Jan 2006 07:29:51 -0800, "K4YZ" wrote:
an old friend wrote: news wrote: Isn't there a way of getting your licence without sitting for the exam.... eg... being educated in one of the following professions. electronics engineer communications technician physics professor. Sounds possible to me. the only way t get the license without the exam wouldbe to bride some VE's possible but hardly worthwhile Why would marrying a Canadian Amateur get you an American Amateur Radio license...?!?! Canadian's must take an examination too, Markie...married or otherwise! Steve, K4YZ News/Markie: Correct me if I am wrong, but: A) the Tech exam is 35 multiple choice questions B) anyone who knows the answers could complete it in 15-20 minutes C) 5 and 6 year old children have passed the exam D) IMO, anyone who ever took high school physics and spends 5 minutes reviewing the section on regulations has a decent chance to pass without any study E) you do not need to take one of the many instructional classes, you can go right in to the exam F) the exam is under $10 G) there are frequent VE sessions in many different places, sponsored by radio clubs, often connected with ham fest and flea markets H) any legal workaround would be more difficult than just taking the test, documenting being educated in one of those professions I) does it make sense to do something illegal with federal penalties, just to avoid taking a simple test that a child could pass? Your posting and replies have taken you longer than studying for the test. But you would rather troll. Maybe it is better that you are not on the air. Happy trails, Gary (net.yogi.bear) -- At the 51st percentile of ursine intelligence Gary D. Schwartz, Needham, MA, USA Please reply to: garyDOTschwartzATpoboxDOTcom |
a few corercts
Gary S. wrote: On 16 Jan 2006 07:29:51 -0800, "K4YZ" wrote: an old friend wrote: news wrote: Isn't there a way of getting your licence without sitting for the exam.... eg... being educated in one of the following professions. electronics engineer communications technician physics professor. Sounds possible to me. the only way t get the license without the exam wouldbe to bride some VE's possible but hardly worthwhile Why would marrying a Canadian Amateur get you an American Amateur Radio license...?!?! Canadian's must take an examination too, Markie...married or otherwise! Steve, K4YZ News/Markie: Correct me if I am wrong, but: A) the Tech exam is 35 multiple choice questions yea I think so B) anyone who knows the answers could complete it in 15-20 minutes i manged in less C) 5 and 6 year old children have passed the exam I assume so D) IMO, anyone who ever took high school physics and spends 5 minutes reviewing the section on regulations has a decent chance to pass without any study I did not need 5 mintute but having a MS in Geophysics I can't speak to the HS physics level I passed with out studing regs stuff ButI have spent most of my adult lifeworking with federal regs and simply guessed at the answers byt thinking how would a cat write this reg E) you do not need to take one of the many instructional classes, you can go right in to the exam right F) the exam is under $10 last year the price had risen to 14 dollos G) there are frequent VE sessions in many different places, sponsored by radio clubs, often connected with ham fest and flea markets yep H) any legal workaround would be more difficult than just taking the test, documenting being educated in one of those professions honestly if we wanted to Don't see that a legal workaround ivloving sya sending you degree to the ARRL VEC or other VEC would be that hard but the test is hardly a brden I) does it make sense to do something illegal with federal penalties, just to avoid taking a simple test that a child could pass? nope but this is the US Govtwe talking about if makes sense then I canassure the Govt is not behind it Your posting and replies have taken you longer than studying for the test. But you would rather troll. Maybe it is better that you are not on the air. no i was corect various points Happy trails, Gary (net.yogi.bear) -- At the 51st percentile of ursine intelligence Gary D. Schwartz, Needham, MA, USA Please reply to: garyDOTschwartzATpoboxDOTcom |
a few corercts
"an old friend" wrote in message oups.com... Gary S. wrote: On 16 Jan 2006 07:29:51 -0800, "K4YZ" wrote: an old friend wrote: news wrote: Isn't there a way of getting your licence without sitting for the exam.... eg... being educated in one of the following professions. electronics engineer communications technician physics professor. Sounds possible to me. the only way t get the license without the exam wouldbe to bride some VE's possible but hardly worthwhile Why would marrying a Canadian Amateur get you an American Amateur Radio license...?!?! Canadian's must take an examination too, Markie...married or otherwise! Steve, K4YZ News/Markie: Correct me if I am wrong, but: A) the Tech exam is 35 multiple choice questions yea I think so B) anyone who knows the answers could complete it in 15-20 minutes i manged in less C) 5 and 6 year old children have passed the exam I assume so D) IMO, anyone who ever took high school physics and spends 5 minutes reviewing the section on regulations has a decent chance to pass without any study I did not need 5 mintute but having a MS in Geophysics I can't speak to the HS physics level I passed with out studing regs stuff ButI have spent most of my adult lifeworking with federal regs and simply guessed at the answers byt thinking how would a cat write this reg E) you do not need to take one of the many instructional classes, you can go right in to the exam right F) the exam is under $10 last year the price had risen to 14 dollos G) there are frequent VE sessions in many different places, sponsored by radio clubs, often connected with ham fest and flea markets yep H) any legal workaround would be more difficult than just taking the test, documenting being educated in one of those professions honestly if we wanted to Don't see that a legal workaround ivloving sya sending you degree to the ARRL VEC or other VEC would be that hard but the test is hardly a brden I) does it make sense to do something illegal with federal penalties, just to avoid taking a simple test that a child could pass? nope but this is the US Govtwe talking about if makes sense then I canassure the Govt is not behind it Your posting and replies have taken you longer than studying for the test. But you would rather troll. Maybe it is better that you are not on the air. no i was corect various points Happy trails, Gary (net.yogi.bear) -- At the 51st percentile of ursine intelligence Gary D. Schwartz, Needham, MA, USA Please reply to: garyDOTschwartzATpoboxDOTcom Good lord man! Pull the Corona beer bottle out of your ass and learn to read what you type! You obviously are one of those that never learned to touch type and stare at the keyboard as if someone moved the keys since you last attempted typing. For that problem, most use spell checkers. |
a few corercts
U-Know-Who wrote: "an old friend" wrote in message oups.com... cut Good lord man! Pull the Corona beer bottle out of your ass and learn to read what you type! You obviously are one of those that never learned to touch type and stare at the keyboard as if someone moved the keys since you last attempted typing. For that problem, most use spell checkers. how you doing Tom Riddle still trying to shake off the breeding you think you suffer in the mean time care to post something realted to the subject |
a few corercts
"an old friend" wrote in message ups.com... U-Know-Who wrote: "an old friend" wrote in message oups.com... cut Good lord man! Pull the Corona beer bottle out of your ass and learn to read what you type! You obviously are one of those that never learned to touch type and stare at the keyboard as if someone moved the keys since you last attempted typing. For that problem, most use spell checkers. how you doing Tom Riddle still trying to shake off the breeding you think you suffer in the mean time care to post something realted to the subject My name is not Tom Riddle, I do not know what a "breeding" is, and what is "realted"? Do you know what these are? (.), ('), (?) Is English your second language? |
a few corercts
U-Know-Who wrote: "an old friend" wrote in message ups.com... cut My name is not Tom Riddle, I do not know what a "breeding" is, and what is "realted"? Do you know what these are? it sure is or at least till you drop the pretenses Tom gues you don't get out much tom |
OT Dogie Ham Radio, How I got caught
no, queenie. wrong again. stating a fact to you, which you cannot
comprehend. |
More Markie Mularkie
Keyclowns are too stupid to be hams
|
a few corercts
if he pulls the bottle out you will lick the neck, no doubt
|
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 02:15 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
RadioBanter.com