| Page 1 of 2 | 1 | 2 |
|
|
get it through your head robeson
you post a fraudulant apology and then you claim you did not post it
you don't get the truce that apology asked for what you did is called theft by deception |
get it through your head robeson
an old friend wrote:
you post a fraudulant apology and then you claim you did not post it you don't get the truce that apology asked for what you did is called theft by deception It is ridiculous for you to assume that Steve made the post with an offer of truce since he has never ever used such language in any post. What you did is called error, magnified by stupidity. Dave K8MN |
get it through your head robeson
On Fri, 20 Jan 2006 17:14:28 GMT, Dave Heil
wrote: an old friend wrote: you post a fraudulant apology and then you claim you did not post it you don't get the truce that apology asked for what you did is called theft by deception It is ridiculous for you to assume that Steve made the post with an offer of truce since he has never ever used such language in any post. yhe has used worse language and uses simliar language often futher the headers macth those of other posts by steve he posted it he used the langauge as a ruse What you did is called error, magnified by stupidity. no it is called being tolerant magnafied by treachery Dave K8MN _________________________________________ Usenet Zone Free Binaries Usenet Server More than 140,000 groups Unlimited download http://www.usenetzone.com to open account |
get it through your head robeson
|
get it through your head robeson
Dave Heil wrote: wrote: On Fri, 20 Jan 2006 17:14:28 GMT, Dave Heil wrote: an old friend wrote: you post a fraudulant apology and then you claim you did not post it you don't get the truce that apology asked for what you did is called theft by deception It is ridiculous for you to assume that Steve made the post with an offer of truce since he has never ever used such language in any post. yhe has used worse language and uses simliar language often No, I don't believe that he has. so? futher the headers macth those of other posts by steve No, Colonel, they do not. certainly seem toin waht why are they defferent? he posted it No, I don't believe he did. prove it or let steve prove tit even better he refuses to even try by his own standards that is a confession he used the langauge as a ruse He used profane language to lull you into a false sense of security, did he? no he used it to set up a situtaion if I ignored he flae on new fronts if i acepted it he'd deviler this new attack What you did is called error, magnified by stupidity. no it is called being tolerant magnafied by treachery I explained what you did. no you just lied some more trying to catch stev as the niggest liar on RRAP one of your biggest is the assertion you are a good christains another is that you are law abiding |
get it through your head robeson
an old friend wrote:
Dave Heil wrote: wrote: On Fri, 20 Jan 2006 17:14:28 GMT, Dave Heil wrote: an old friend wrote: you post a fraudulant apology and then you claim you did not post it you don't get the truce that apology asked for what you did is called theft by deception It is ridiculous for you to assume that Steve made the post with an offer of truce since he has never ever used such language in any post. yhe has used worse language and uses simliar language often No, I don't believe that he has. so? So it appears that you've told another in a long line of falsehoods. futher the headers macth those of other posts by steve No, Colonel, they do not. certainly seem toin waht why are they defferent? Why are they different? Because they *are* different. he posted it No, I don't believe he did. prove it or let steve prove tit even better he refuses to even try by his own standards that is a confession Let Steve prove what? Why should I prove anything to you when you can do it for yourself? he used the langauge as a ruse He used profane language to lull you into a false sense of security, did he? no he used it to set up a situtaion if I ignored he flae on new fronts if i acepted it he'd deviler this new attack He'd do what to this new attack? You ignored he what? What you did is called error, magnified by stupidity. no it is called being tolerant magnafied by treachery I explained what you did. no you just lied some more trying to catch stev as the niggest liar on RRAP I'm trying to catch Steve as the what? one of your biggest is the assertion you are a good christains A good what? another is that you are law abiding Do you have evidence to the contrary, Colonel or is this just more evidence of your descent into madness? Dave K8MN |
get it through your head robeson
an old friend wrote: you post a fraudulant apology and then you claim you did not post it you don't get the truce that apology asked for what you did is called theft by deception Mark, understand that there is no trucing with Steve. |
Where's The Truce, Mark?
an old friend wrote: you post a fraudulant apology and then you claim you did not post it you don't get the truce that apology asked for what you did is called theft by deception I didn't post a fraudulent anything. But I did give us both the opportunity to cool things off. What I CONTINUE to see are a bunch of threads re-tasked with the same-ole "stve ####" subject lines despite having myself laid off the ususal rhetoric. So where's the truce, Mark? Steve, K4YZ |
no apology no no turce
no apology no no turce |
More Markie Mularkie
|
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 03:38 PM. |
|
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
RadioBanter.com