you post a fraudulant apology and then you claim you did not post it
you don't get the truce that apology asked for

what you did is called theft by deception

an old friend wrote:
you post a fraudulant apology and then you claim you did not post it
you don't get the truce that apology asked for

what you did is called theft by deception

It is ridiculous for you to assume that Steve made the post with an
offer of truce since he has never ever used such language in any post.

What you did is called error, magnified by stupidity.

Dave K8MN

On Fri, 20 Jan 2006 17:14:28 GMT, Dave Heil
wrote:

an old friend wrote:
you post a fraudulant apology and then you claim you did not post it
you don't get the truce that apology asked for

what you did is called theft by deception

It is ridiculous for you to assume that Steve made the post with an
offer of truce since he has never ever used such language in any post.

yhe has used worse language and uses simliar language often

futher the headers macth those of other posts by steve

he posted it

he used the langauge as a ruse

What you did is called error, magnified by stupidity.

no it is called being tolerant magnafied by treachery

Dave K8MN

_________________________________________
Usenet Zone Free Binaries Usenet Server
More than 140,000 groups
Unlimited download
http://www.usenetzone.com to open account

wrote:
On Fri, 20 Jan 2006 17:14:28 GMT, Dave Heil
wrote:

an old friend wrote:
you post a fraudulant apology and then you claim you did not post it
you don't get the truce that apology asked for

what you did is called theft by deception
It is ridiculous for you to assume that Steve made the post with an
offer of truce since he has never ever used such language in any post.

yhe has used worse language and uses simliar language often

No, I don't believe that he has.

futher the headers macth those of other posts by steve

No, Colonel, they do not.

he posted it

No, I don't believe he did.

he used the langauge as a ruse

He used profane language to lull you into a false sense of security, did he?

What you did is called error, magnified by stupidity.

no it is called being tolerant magnafied by treachery

I explained what you did. Now you've used error and stupidity once again.

Dave K8MN

Dave Heil wrote:
wrote:
On Fri, 20 Jan 2006 17:14:28 GMT, Dave Heil
wrote:

an old friend wrote:
you post a fraudulant apology and then you claim you did not post it
you don't get the truce that apology asked for

what you did is called theft by deception
It is ridiculous for you to assume that Steve made the post with an
offer of truce since he has never ever used such language in any post.

yhe has used worse language and uses simliar language often

No, I don't believe that he has.

so?

futher the headers macth those of other posts by steve

No, Colonel, they do not.

certainly seem toin waht why are they defferent?

he posted it

No, I don't believe he did.
prove it or let steve prove tit even better he refuses to even try by
his own standards that is a confession

he used the langauge as a ruse

He used profane language to lull you into a false sense of security, did he?

no he used it to set up a situtaion if I ignored he flae on new fronts
if i acepted it he'd deviler this new attack

What you did is called error, magnified by stupidity.

no it is called being tolerant magnafied by treachery

I explained what you did.
no you just lied some more trying to catch stev as the niggest liar on
RRAP

one of your biggest is the assertion you are a good christains

another is that you are law abiding

an old friend wrote:
Dave Heil wrote:
wrote:
On Fri, 20 Jan 2006 17:14:28 GMT, Dave Heil
wrote:

an old friend wrote:
you post a fraudulant apology and then you claim you did not post it
you don't get the truce that apology asked for

what you did is called theft by deception

It is ridiculous for you to assume that Steve made the post with an
offer of truce since he has never ever used such language in any post.

yhe has used worse language and uses simliar language often

No, I don't believe that he has.

so?

So it appears that you've told another in a long line of falsehoods.

futher the headers macth those of other posts by steve

No, Colonel, they do not.

certainly seem toin waht why are they defferent?

Why are they different? Because they *are* different.

he posted it

No, I don't believe he did.

prove it or let steve prove tit even better he refuses to even try by
his own standards that is a confession

Let Steve prove what? Why should I prove anything to you when you can
do it for yourself?

he used the langauge as a ruse

He used profane language to lull you into a false sense of security, did he?

no he used it to set up a situtaion if I ignored he flae on new fronts
if i acepted it he'd deviler this new attack

He'd do what to this new attack? You ignored he what?

What you did is called error, magnified by stupidity.

no it is called being tolerant magnafied by treachery

I explained what you did.

no you just lied some more trying to catch stev as the niggest liar on
RRAP

I'm trying to catch Steve as the what?


one of your biggest is the assertion you are a good christains

A good what?

another is that you are law abiding

Do you have evidence to the contrary, Colonel or is this just more
evidence of your descent into madness?

Dave K8MN

an old friend wrote:
you post a fraudulant apology and then you claim you did not post it
you don't get the truce that apology asked for

what you did is called theft by deception

Mark, understand that there is no trucing with Steve.

an old friend wrote:
you post a fraudulant apology and then you claim you did not post it
you don't get the truce that apology asked for

what you did is called theft by deception

I didn't post a fraudulent anything.

But I did give us both the opportunity to cool things off.

What I CONTINUE to see are a bunch of threads re-tasked with the
same-ole "stve ####" subject lines despite having myself laid off the
ususal rhetoric.

So where's the truce, Mark?

Steve, K4YZ

no apology no no turce

wrote:
On Fri, 20 Jan 2006 17:14:28 GMT, Dave Heil
wrote:

an old friend wrote:
you post a fraudulant apology and then you claim you did not post it
you don't get the truce that apology asked for

what you did is called theft by deception

It is ridiculous for you to assume that Steve made the post with an
offer of truce since he has never ever used such language in any post.

yhe has used worse language and uses simliar language often

Nope. Never.

futher the headers macth those of other posts by steve

No they don't.

he posted it

More Mark Morgan lying.

he used the langauge as a ruse

Nope. Someone ELSE used it to get your goat.

For half a day you acted like a nice guy.

Then it was right back to being an idiot.

What you did is called error, magnified by stupidity.

no it is called being tolerant magnafied by treachery

Yes, Markie...You're being treacherous...Again.

Steve, K4YZ