On 27 Jan 2006 07:27:25 -0800, "Major Dud" wrote in
.com:


Frankie of Silliland wrote:
On 26 Jan 2006 00:43:55 -0800, "Major Dud" wrote in
.com:
Frankie of Silliland wrote:
On 25 Jan 2006 10:32:41 -0800, "Major Dud" wrote in
.com:

snip
I served. You didn't. That's a fact.

I served. Honorably.

Prove it.

Done already. That you wuss out on following up on the public
resources provided is not my problem.

Your "resources" do not prove that you are the Gunny Robeson who -did-
serve. You tried that excuse before. It didn't work then and it won't
work now.

It doesn't matter what YOU think.


Yet you are compelled to reply to my posts. Quite the paradox, Dud.


Oh...BTW...There was a pictorial article in the MAG-16 newspaper
in 1988 for one of my CG Certificate's of Commendation for
lifesaving...A Lance Corporal put his arm through a window and I
managed to keep him from bleeding to death.


Gee, let me stroll on down to 7-11 and see if they have it on the
rack.....


You're welcome to find your OWN excuse as for how it happens to be
the same "Steven J Robeson" that appears on my AOL and QRZ sites,
Frankie.


You make more than enough excuses for your ignorance about your
alleged MOS and lack of any proof of your alleged service.


You didn't. THAT is a fact.

That is your OPINION, an opinion which isn't shared by the same branch
of the US military that issued my Honorable Discharge certificate.
Where's your's, Dud? Heck, forget the DD-214 -- just scan and post
your Honorable Discharge certificate.

Sorry, Frankie...Any punk that can "brag" about two and a half
promotions to Lance Corporal in ONE tour did not serve honorably.

Again, that's your OPINION, and it's only YOUR opinion.

Obviously not.

They wouldn't let you stay in the Corps. (Here comes FRANKIE'S
excuses now...He's always alleging OTHERS have "excuses...Let's see
his...)


Excuse for what? Your ignorance about the information on a DD-214
(after you claimed to have several of them)?


And you're still a wuss for not following the resources you claim
you know so well to verify my service.

As I have said before (several times), you have just as many resources
at your disposal as I do. And I can't find anything that verifies your
alleged service.


Riiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii iiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiight............ .....................................


Leeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee eeeeeeeeeeft..........

Riiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii iiiiiiiiight..........

Leeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee eeeeeeeeeeft..........

Quick-time, harch!


That you insinuate such a buddy-buddy relationship with Oliver
North

I never said I had any such relationship. You tried that tactic
before. It didn't work then and it won't work now.

Sure you did.


We've been through this before, Dud. Your excuse -then- was that I
"implied" such a relationship existed, yet you never did respond to my
reply where I quoted my own post on the subject. Maybe your ISP sucks
and you didn't get the post -- shall I post it again?


Why do you set yourself up as a li....Oh...wait...You already ARE
a liar...

Never mind.

yet can't seem to find a copy of the SNCO boards in back copies
of Navy Times pretty well sets you up as the liar I claim you to be.

Again.

And again, I have no doubt that there was a Steven J. Robeson who
served in the USMC for about 18 years. I also have no doubt, and I
formally concede, that his name appears in the publications you cite.
But once again, you have provide no proof that you are him. Your
inability to comprehend such a simple concept is remarkable in that it
demonstrates desperation in your evasiveness, as well as utter
stupidity for thinking that anyone would actually believe such crap.

I understand fine.


Yet you obfuscate the issue as follows:


You make excuses then whine about people making excuses.

I have no doubt that it was that whining that helped seal your fate
in the Corps.


Obviously you -don't- understand.


I'm getting tired of your old excuses -- got any new ones?

I don't need "excuses", Frankie. I have facts.


Where?


That you try to
pooh-pooh them off is YOUR "excuse".

And, like you, a poor excuse it is, too.


My only "excuse" is that your "facts" can't be verified. Feel free to
spin that any way you want.


Steve "Yellow Dog" Robeson, K4YZ


Who's your lawyer, Dud?









----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Unrestricted-Secure Usenet News==----
http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups
----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =----

an_old_friend wrote:
K4YZ wrote:
Frankie of Silliland wrote:
On 26 Jan 2006 00:43:55 -0800, "Major Dud" wrote in
cut
Your "resources" do not prove that you are the Gunny Robeson who -did-
serve. You tried that excuse before. It didn't work then and it won't
work now.

It doesn't matter what YOU think.

obviously you care very much

Steve chooses to be a dumbass.

wrote:
raped_an_old_boyfriend wrote:
K4YZ wrote:
Frankie of Silliland wrote:
On 26 Jan 2006 00:43:55 -0800, "Major Dud" wrote in
cut
Your "resources" do not prove that you are the Gunny Robeson who -did-
serve. You tried that excuse before. It didn't work then and it won't
work now.

It doesn't matter what YOU think.

obviously you care very much

Steve chooses to be a dumbass.

While you come by it naturally.

wrote:
From: Frank Gilliland on Jan 25, 9:09 am

On 25 Jan 2006 08:22:12 -0800, "K4YZ" wrote in
Frankie of Silliland wrote:
On 24 Jan 2006 22:34:55 -0800, "Major Dud" wrote in
Frankie of Silliland wrote:
On 24 Jan 2006 15:04:38 -0800, "Major Dud" wrote in
an old friend wrote:
K4YZ wrote:


Who's your lawyer, Dud?

Change of subject, eh, Frankie..?!?!

Your imaginary lawyer has been the subject for quite some time.

Imaginary?

His new wife will be interested to know she's been sleeping with an
aparition.

"apparition"

Ghoul friend? :-)

He'll be ****ed when he sees that his newest client is discussing his
new wife and her sleeping habits on the web. Hi! Steve really is
stupid.

Ya came out swinging with that "big revelation" of yours about how
I allegedly claimed to have served with 1/24, yet haven't addressed the
FACT that you were AGAIN wrong.

Doesn't matter if I was right or wrong -- you've already proven that
you never served at all.

But WAIT a minute...

YOU just put out a "big expose" allegedly proving I WAS in the
service...?!?!

Seems you're very confused.

Hardly. My "big expose", as you describe it, was an exercise in
trolling. It worked. But then, all I have to do is mention your name
in a post and you get all upset. So I guess I put more effort into
writing it than was necessary..... but what the hell, it was fun, and
so was your response.

If Dud's response was any more outraged, he would have to outsource
the outrage to handle it all... :-)

May I suggest India? Their post-docs do "outraged" better than anyone
I've ever seen.

Most liars of your character are, though.

And of COURSE it matters if you were "right or wrong"...You made
statements as facts that were, to a person as allegedly informed of
military matters as you, NOT factual.

Just like your "statements as facts" about the JULIETT crypto system.

The only "KY" that Dud knows is a jelly...

Steve always forgets; the powder goes inside the glove, the KY goes on
the outside of the glove.

It's just too much fun to watch you fabricate
justifications and excuses for your contradictions, and I have a few
days off from work, so I thought I'd rattle your cage a bit. You never
fail to amuse.

Seems YOU are the one with the fabrications, Frankie...

Yet you continue to respond to them as if they threatened your very
existence.

They DO threaten his imaginary existance! :-)

Dudly has been living his USMC LIE so long that he MUST keep
up the pretense in order to (in his world) "save face."

I saw an article in the USA Today last week about a former USMC lance
corporal who has been telling folks he was a Colonel for about 50
years. So he was asked to speak at an engagement, and someone there
began to question this guy's credentials. Now he's faced with 5 years
of imprisonment and $10,000 fine.

And I'm still curious about Robeson's seven (7) hostile actions. When
and where for starters.

No wonder you were busted twice. You deserved it.

I served. You didn't. That's a fact.

All that Dudly produces for "proof of his active-duty service"
is a lot of blustery name-calling of his challengers. He hopes
to keep all thinking about his "lying challengers" in order to
weasel out of producing any tangible proof.

His DD-214 copy is nowhere to be seen.

Anything in the way of photographs of 18 years of "service" is
nowhere to be seen.

Anything in the way of other documentation of those 18 years
of "service" is nowhere to be seen.

Steve was probably one of those "Nowhere to be seen" soldiers who
always was someplace else when the going got tuff.

I'd think you'd get tired of getting slapped around with your own
stupidity by now...

"Stupidity?" Not really. A check of USMC units shows which
ones are the Reserves and which are the Active-duty. Dudly
wasn't in any named Active-duty unit.

Nowhere to be seen.

Who's your lawyer, Dud?

He doesn't have one. None would take his "case." :-)

Yet Steve seems to know who a newlywed attorneys wife is sleeping with.

Wonder why Steve always has to bring the women folk into his messes?

Dudly keeps on insulting those who challenge his truthfulness.
He offers NO proof, only those personal insults. He lost
credibility in here years ago...but the "CW" Extras in here
all condone his activity. Who woulda thought it?



Welp, I recall Jim Miccolis asking him why he keept replying to you,
and more recently Jim Hampton asked him to refrain from posting.

All that's just covering up that Steve is not a good net citizen, and
needs to apologize to all the folks he's offended over the years with
his despicable claims. Then he needs to refrain from grossly off topic
stuff such as who Mark sleeps with or who his new attorney's wife is
sleeping with, dialing..., rocks through , slashed tires, and
terrorized wives, homosexuality, pedophilia, and outrageous claims of
what a macho marine he was (if he ever was a marine).

How you been, Len?

bb

On 28 Jan 2006 11:08:43 -0800, wrote:


wrote:
From: Frank Gilliland on Jan 25, 9:09 am

On 25 Jan 2006 08:22:12 -0800, "K4YZ" wrote in
Frankie of Silliland wrote:
On 24 Jan 2006 22:34:55 -0800, "Major Dud" wrote in
Frankie of Silliland wrote:
On 24 Jan 2006 15:04:38 -0800, "Major Dud" wrote in
an old friend wrote:
K4YZ wrote:


Who's your lawyer, Dud?

Change of subject, eh, Frankie..?!?!

Your imaginary lawyer has been the subject for quite some time.

Imaginary?

His new wife will be interested to know she's been sleeping with an
aparition.

"apparition"

Ghoul friend? :-)

He'll be ****ed when he sees that his newest client is discussing his
new wife and her sleeping habits on the web. Hi! Steve really is
stupid.

Ya came out swinging with that "big revelation" of yours about how
I allegedly claimed to have served with 1/24, yet haven't addressed the
FACT that you were AGAIN wrong.

Doesn't matter if I was right or wrong -- you've already proven that
you never served at all.

But WAIT a minute...

YOU just put out a "big expose" allegedly proving I WAS in the
service...?!?!

Seems you're very confused.

Hardly. My "big expose", as you describe it, was an exercise in
trolling. It worked. But then, all I have to do is mention your name
in a post and you get all upset. So I guess I put more effort into
writing it than was necessary..... but what the hell, it was fun, and
so was your response.

If Dud's response was any more outraged, he would have to outsource
the outrage to handle it all... :-)

May I suggest India? Their post-docs do "outraged" better than anyone
I've ever seen.

Most liars of your character are, though.

And of COURSE it matters if you were "right or wrong"...You made
statements as facts that were, to a person as allegedly informed of
military matters as you, NOT factual.

Just like your "statements as facts" about the JULIETT crypto system.

The only "KY" that Dud knows is a jelly...

Steve always forgets; the powder goes inside the glove, the KY goes on
the outside of the glove.

It's just too much fun to watch you fabricate
justifications and excuses for your contradictions, and I have a few
days off from work, so I thought I'd rattle your cage a bit. You never
fail to amuse.

Seems YOU are the one with the fabrications, Frankie...

Yet you continue to respond to them as if they threatened your very
existence.

They DO threaten his imaginary existance! :-)

Dudly has been living his USMC LIE so long that he MUST keep
up the pretense in order to (in his world) "save face."

I saw an article in the USA Today last week about a former USMC lance
corporal who has been telling folks he was a Colonel for about 50
years. So he was asked to speak at an engagement, and someone there
began to question this guy's credentials. Now he's faced with 5 years
of imprisonment and $10,000 fine.

And I'm still curious about Robeson's seven (7) hostile actions. When
and where for starters.

No wonder you were busted twice. You deserved it.

I served. You didn't. That's a fact.

All that Dudly produces for "proof of his active-duty service"
is a lot of blustery name-calling of his challengers. He hopes
to keep all thinking about his "lying challengers" in order to
weasel out of producing any tangible proof.

His DD-214 copy is nowhere to be seen.

Anything in the way of photographs of 18 years of "service" is
nowhere to be seen.

Anything in the way of other documentation of those 18 years
of "service" is nowhere to be seen.

Steve was probably one of those "Nowhere to be seen" soldiers who
always was someplace else when the going got tuff.

I'd think you'd get tired of getting slapped around with your own
stupidity by now...

"Stupidity?" Not really. A check of USMC units shows which
ones are the Reserves and which are the Active-duty. Dudly
wasn't in any named Active-duty unit.

Nowhere to be seen.

Who's your lawyer, Dud?

He doesn't have one. None would take his "case." :-)

Yet Steve seems to know who a newlywed attorneys wife is sleeping with.

Wonder why Steve always has to bring the women folk into his messes?

Dudly keeps on insulting those who challenge his truthfulness.
He offers NO proof, only those personal insults. He lost
credibility in here years ago...but the "CW" Extras in here
all condone his activity. Who woulda thought it?



Welp, I recall Jim Miccolis asking him why he keept replying to you,
and more recently Jim Hampton asked him to refrain from posting.

All that's just covering up that Steve is not a good net citizen, and
needs to apologize to all the folks he's offended over the years with
his despicable claims.
gee I thought you wanted to slwo steve posting not kick t into high
gear

Imagine the torent of abuse that would fill all those "apologies"

I don't think we could take deviling such online apologies to all
the people his has offened over the years
Then he needs to refrain from grossly off topic
stuff such as who Mark sleeps with or who his new attorney's wife is
sleeping with, dialing..., rocks through , slashed tires, and
terrorized wives, homosexuality, pedophilia, and outrageous claims of
what a macho marine he was (if he ever was a marine).

How you been, Len?

bb

_________________________________________
Usenet Zone Free Binaries Usenet Server
More than 140,000 groups
Unlimited download
http://www.usenetzone.com to open account

wrote:
On 28 Jan 2006 11:08:43 -0800, wrote:

All that's just covering up that Steve is not a good net citizen, and
needs to apologize to all the folks he's offended over the years with
his despicable claims.

gee I thought you wanted to slwo steve posting not kick t into high
gear

For a moment I'll reply as if I were a PCTA EXtra, "I am not
responsible for what Steve does."

Imagine the torent of abuse that would fill all those "apologies"

I don't think Google has the capacity.

I don't think we could take deviling such online apologies to all
the people his has offened over the years

Sorry. I didn't think it through.

Steveo wrote:

Can you turn the light away from your chest pounding long enough to see
what a fool these people are making of you, or at least stop cross posting
to rrcb when you #### yourself?

The fool here is Frankie.

Go to his house and beat his ###, or shut the #### up, please.

You're cordially invited to follow your own advice, Zero.
Especially the part about "shut(ing) the #### up.

No 73 for you. You're a putz.

Steve, K4YZ

On 28 Jan 2006 20:06:39 -0800, "K4YZ" wrote:


Steveo wrote:

Can you turn the light away from your chest pounding long enough to see
what a fool these people are making of you, or at least stop cross posting
to rrcb when you ass of yourself?

The fool here is Frankie.

how so

if he is you have never shown it such

nor does your reponse have any real relationship to the post made in
the first place

Go to his house and beat his ass, or shut the **** up, please.

You're cordially invited to follow your own advice, Zero.

you are saying he is Mitshibitshii A6M
Especially the part about "shut(ing) the #### up.

what are you saying

No 73 for you. You're a putz.

more sex steve

Steve, K4YZ

_________________________________________
Usenet Zone Free Binaries Usenet Server
More than 140,000 groups
Unlimited download
http://www.usenetzone.com to open account

wrote:
On 28 Jan 2006 20:06:39 -0800, "K4YZ" wrote:
Steveo wrote:

Can you turn the light away from your chest pounding long enough to see
what a fool these people are making of you, or at least stop cross posting
to rrcb when you ass of yourself?

The fool here is Frankie.

how so

Uhhhh...let's start with lying.

Then we'll add in his dishonorable conduct in the Armed Forces.

A pinch of trolling added in with a pinch of deceit, and wa-LAA!
your answer.

if he is you have never shown it such

No...HE has shown it, Markie.

nor does your reponse have any real relationship to the post made in
the first place

It was his comments I was responding to, Markie...Tell it to him!

Go to his house and beat his ass, or shut the **** up, please.

You're cordially invited to follow your own advice, Zero.

you are saying he is Mitshibitshii A6M

What's a Mitshibshii A6M...?!?!

Especially the part about "shut(ing) the #### up.

what are you saying

I am suggesting "Steveo" follow his own advice.

No 73 for you. You're a putz.

more sex steve

Not with you.

Steve, K4YZ

On 28 Jan 2006 21:58:57 -0800, "K4YZ" wrote:

learn to spell
_________________________________________
Usenet Zone Free Binaries Usenet Server
More than 140,000 groups
Unlimited download
http://www.usenetzone.com to open account