|
Here's An Interesting OPERATING Question for RRAPers
Gonzo wrote: nope I was curious something you discourage Uhhhhhhhhhhh.....The whole THREAD was about being "curious", Markie. Thanks for once again demonstrating your ignorance on such a grand scale. Steve, K4YZ ......... Mark does demonstrate a certain amount of ignorance. where? by simply not agreeing with you the email you choose for this Gonzo is right on the mark though trash talker This is cureable, though the enormous extent of Mark's immense stupidity will be forever so. nothing but trash talk in your short career |
Here's An Interesting OPERATING Question for RRAPers
I don't use aioe.org, nice try.....go back NIM BUSTERS with all the
other fascist scumbags on there! Todd N9OGL N.I.M. BUSTERS SUCKS!!!!! http://12.156.123.39/nimsucks/index.php |
contiuing attacks from steve but he complets a cucle proving him a liar
On 29 Jan 2006 02:01:33 -0800, "K4YZ" wrote:
wrote: On 28 Jan 2006 22:03:17 -0800, "K4YZ" wrote: wrote: On 28 Jan 2006 20:20:09 -0800, "K4YZ" wrote: nobodys old friend wrote: K4YZ wrote: Greetings All, Are any of you equipped to work the ISS crossband repeater? yes Have any of you made contacts through it, or directly with NA1SS? yes Do any of you use NASA's www.science.nasa.gov site to determine the footprint? no now thatI have answer 3 of yours ahow about one of mine what has the ISS to do with Policy issues? It has to do with "policy" issues if it means getting RRAP'ers to talk on the same frequency at the same time. thin at best esp as I would not choose to be to be on the same freq as you on any band at any time Too bad for you then, Markie. you must be delsuional to think I would want to talk to you, bad enough dealing with you on RRap I seriously doubt we'd ever be able to carry on a QSO regardless, Markie... avoiding the issue I see I speak English fluently and some conversational German and Spanish. You speak jibberish. you know this How? as far as I know you have never heard me speak Your "writing" on RRAP, where you have the opportunity to proofread your content before sending it, is horriffic. so? what has this got to do with my speaking? I can only imagine what it would be like on any of the realtime keyboard modes. gee nobody has any real problem figuring out what i mean You're devoid of CW skill. this says somethign abotu my speaking abilty I wish you had made this post when Cw testing was still the issue Therefore it's a foregone conclusion that we'll ever have a "QSO" on the Amateur Bands in ANY mode, let alone via the ISS crossband repeater. it is foregone becuase I would hear your call and brak off the contact but you avoid the issue of course Acutally, Markie, YOU are the one on a divergent topic. I was talking about ISS on Amateur Radio. you tuerned it into another antimark attack thread becuase I dared ask what the ISS ars system had to do with RRAP You pulled it into yet another trash thread as evidenced by your retasking of the subject line to something other than the original topic. no I simply retetled the thread to reflect what you turned it into anything? What does your question have to do with the first three? why did it have to? It didn't then why did you ask that question I don't believe that it's any of your business, Markie. i disgree it became my busness when you choose to turn this into another antimark attack thread . But then THERE is where the "attack" you suggest comes from...YOU! no attack existed except in the mind of the oaranoid and micron thin skin felow I am repling too You're repling too? Did you repling also? What's "repling"...?!?! "oaranoid?" Someone who doesn't like using manual propulsion in a bass boat? indeed you are the most paranoid fellow I have ever seen Perhaps. But your a perverted liar. Between the two, I'll take paranoia. any question is an attack More random words in search of order, Markie. Try again. but I questioned as s my rightthe relavance of the post It's not your's to question. yes it my place or anyone else that chooses Not unless you care to state now for the record that you have assumed moderatorship for RRAP, Markie. again you deny that I have the same rights you do Robeson i don't have to be the moderator to ask a question or comment on a post you or anybody else makes on RRAP Unless, of course, I missed the part where a "moderator" was established for the NG? I and anyone may question why something is posted You may "question" anything you want. then you lied a few line up you sted " Not unless you care to state now for the record that you have assumed moderatorship for RRAP, Markie." in response to "yes it my place or anyone else that chooses" which was my response to"It's not your's to question." indeed you just made the stament "It's not your's to question." a lie unles you were lying just now when you typed "You may "question" anything you want." you have said in one thread that I am allowed to A and not allowed A which ever stament is not true one of them is a lie and therfore you are a Liar However you're not entitled to an answer, mandatory or otherwise. I never said I was you OTOH have insited that you are entitled to answer and therfore I belocome etitled to answer from YOU or to call you on it when you refuse to meet your won standard Anything? everything Or just can't stand seeing me talk about something OTHER than you, eh? nope I was curious something you discourage Uhhhhhhhhhhh.....The whole THREAD was about being "curious", Markie. another the thread was about you indulging yours, no one is ever allowed to be curious as you replies prove E N G L I S H, Markie... it is Thanks for once again demonstrating your ignorance on such a grand scale. what ignorance? Yours. In spades. I certainly know what you up to No you don't. sure do it is obvious more diversion from your misdeeds The diversion here is yours, Your Punkiness. more name calling I asked a legitimate question about an Amateur Radio related event. and I asked what it had to do with policy You pulled it into yet another slimefest in only 1 set of exchanges. and therfore you claim despite saying I may ask question that I may not ask any Steve, K4YZ _________________________________________ Usenet Zone Free Binaries Usenet Server More than 140,000 groups Unlimited download http://www.usenetzone.com to open account |
Here's An Interesting OPERATING Question for RRAPers
On 28 Jan 2006 20:16:11 -0800, K4YZ wrote:
Larry wrote: On 28 Jan 2006 06:12:03 -0800, K4YZ wrote: Greetings All, Are any of you equipped to work the ISS crossband repeater? Actually, you don't need crossband capability to use the ISS repeater. Actually you do when the input is on 70 centimeters and the output is on 2 meters. That's what "crossband" means. Actually, I stand by my original statement: You don't NEED crossband capability to use the ISS repeater. I've worked MIR twice on that pair and had a blast. I guess it's easy to "not like" if you don't have the requisite skills or capable staion to do it with. I made contacts through AMSAT way back in the early 70's when the OSCAR series of the 60's was being continued. It boiled down to being a novelty activity for hams, but one which only imitated what communications engineers and other professionals had pioneered long before hams used a satellite. In fact, most OSCAR satellites were stuffed into the unused space in government launch vehicles and were essentially CARE packages from those who were doing the real pioneering work. Nope, I say the VoIP Echolink or IRLP method is much more reliable. Perhaps it is. And if that's what spins your propeller, mor power to you. But making a "contact" via Echolink is no more challenging that turning the light on when you enter a room. I see. And I suppose that, when you decide to cross a river, you eschew the nearby bridges in favor of swimming across instead. Do you also use a horse instead of choosing to own a car? Some can say that about FM, or SSB, or CW, or any other mode. However anyone can turn the computer on and work Echolink. There's no skill in that. Anyone can turn on a transceiver and push a button. There's no real skill in that either. But there *is* skill in figuring out optimal voice sampling and compression techniques, combining them with the optimal IP protocol (UDP/IP), and then writing and installing VoIP software to accomplish that end, followed by setting up servers and repeaters to support it. In fact, I submit that the hams who embraced the Internet and developed those methods are among the most technically skilled members of the amateur community. If all you do is push a button, then you're an appliance operator in my estimation. |
Here's An Interesting OPERATING Question for RRAPers
Larry wrote: On 28 Jan 2006 20:16:11 -0800, K4YZ wrote: Larry wrote: On 28 Jan 2006 06:12:03 -0800, K4YZ wrote: Greetings All, Are any of you equipped to work the ISS crossband repeater? Actually, you don't need crossband capability to use the ISS repeater. Actually you do when the input is on 70 centimeters and the output is on 2 meters. That's what "crossband" means. Actually, I stand by my original statement: You don't NEED crossband capability to use the ISS repeater. indeed you don't and trying to use crossband capcity can in fact be harder than using 2 monoband radios I've worked MIR twice on that pair and had a blast. I guess it's easy to "not like" if you don't have the requisite skills or capable staion to do it with. I made contacts through AMSAT way back in the early 70's when the OSCAR series of the 60's was being continued. It boiled down to being a novelty activity for hams, but one which only imitated what communications engineers and other professionals had pioneered long before hams used a satellite. In fact, most OSCAR satellites were stuffed into the unused space in government launch vehicles and were essentially CARE packages from those who were doing the real pioneering work. Nope, I say the VoIP Echolink or IRLP method is much more reliable. Perhaps it is. And if that's what spins your propeller, mor power to you. But making a "contact" via Echolink is no more challenging that turning the light on when you enter a room. I see. bear in mind Steve one of the folks claiming how awful it will to end CW testing Steve is of the S&M school of licensing claiming we must suffer to get our licenses And I suppose that, when you decide to cross a river, you eschew the nearby bridges in favor of swimming across instead. Do you also use a horse instead of choosing to own a car? Some can say that about FM, or SSB, or CW, or any other mode. However anyone can turn the computer on and work Echolink. There's no skill in that. Anyone can turn on a transceiver and push a button. There's no real skill in that either. But there *is* skill in figuring out optimal voice sampling and compression techniques, combining them with the optimal IP protocol (UDP/IP), and then writing and installing VoIP software to accomplish that end, followed by setting up servers and repeaters to support it. In fact, I submit that the hams who embraced the Internet and developed those methods are among the most technically skilled members of the amateur community. he is not into tehinal skil instead on AIR S&M If all you do is push a button, then you're an appliance operator in my estimation. |
Here's An Interesting OPERATING Question for RRAPers
My opinion is machine is illegal becaues it not in US territory when
retransmit. Use it and you just the same as using pirate offshore station and FCC should fine you. But FCC owned by pepole like Don Clancy and so look other way. That why I hate FCC so come my blog to see more. Not true, the station is in fact very LEGAL, I've use to work space station MIR on a handheld on 2 meters both voice and packet, I've also worked oscar 10 which was 10 meters up, 2 meters down or the other way around I forget it was long ago. Todd N9OGL |
Here's An Interesting OPERATING Question for RRAPers
On 29 Jan 2006 13:01:22 -0800, "N9OGL" wrote:
My opinion is machine is illegal becaues it not in US territory when retransmit. Use it and you just the same as using pirate offshore station and FCC should fine you. But FCC owned by pepole like Don Clancy and so look other way. That why I hate FCC so come my blog to see more. Not true, the station is in fact very LEGAL, I've use to work space station MIR on a handheld on 2 meters both voice and packet, I've also worked oscar 10 which was 10 meters up, 2 meters down or the other way around I forget it was long ago. 2 up 10 down tood tech like me could use the mode Todd N9OGL _________________________________________ Usenet Zone Free Binaries Usenet Server More than 140,000 groups Unlimited download http://www.usenetzone.com to open account |
Here's An Interesting OPERATING Question for RRAPers
On 29 Jan 2006 13:01:22 -0800, N9OGL wrote: My opinion is machine is illegal becaues it not in US territory when retransmit. Use it and you just the same as using pirate offshore station and FCC should fine you. But FCC owned by pepole like Don Clancy and so look other way. That why I hate FCC so come my blog to see more. Not true, the station is in fact very LEGAL, I've use to work space station MIR on a handheld on 2 meters both voice and packet, I've also worked oscar 10 which was 10 meters up, 2 meters down or the other way around I forget it was long ago. Very bad. You talking non-free world station with Russian call who not even in teritory so you violate presidental order big time. Better hope Bush and NSA not read you post or you will get in hot water. FCC has list of contries can not work legally and you violeated it most likely. |
no mere foregry but stupid foorgery
NO9GL wrote: On 29 Jan 2006 13:01:22 -0800, N9OGL wrote: Not true, the station is in fact very LEGAL, I've use to work space station MIR on a handheld on 2 meters both voice and packet, I've also worked oscar 10 which was 10 meters up, 2 meters down or the other way around I forget it was long ago. Very bad. You talking non-free world station with Russian call who not even in teritory so you violate presidental order big time. Better hope Bush and NSA not read you post or you will get in hot water. FCC has list of contries can not work legally and you violeated it most likely. title says it all |
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 09:08 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
RadioBanter.com