RadioBanter

RadioBanter (https://www.radiobanter.com/)
-   Policy (https://www.radiobanter.com/policy/)
-   -   any news from CA about 220-222? (https://www.radiobanter.com/policy/88031-any-news-ca-about-220-222-a.html)

an old friend February 7th 06 07:41 PM

any news from CA about 220-222?
 
anything or are the wheels still grinding there slow tune


[email protected] February 7th 06 11:41 PM

any news from CA about 220-222?
 

an old friend wrote:
anything or are the wheels still grinding there slow tune


People are probably still denying that "use it or lose it" was a factor
in the USA loss of 220, and that the USA set the trend for the change
up north.


an old friend February 8th 06 03:46 AM

any news from CA about 220-222?
 

wrote:
an old friend wrote:
anything or are the wheels still grinding there slow tune


People are probably still denying that "use it or lose it" was a factor
in the USA loss of 220, and that the USA set the trend for the change
up north.


Indeed OTOH I will almost welcome it as maybe the local 222 boys will
stop bitching that CA Hams talking outside our frequency ranges


[email protected] February 10th 06 01:38 AM

any news from CA about 220-222?
 

an old friend wrote:
wrote:
an old friend wrote:
anything or are the wheels still grinding there slow tune


People are probably still denying that "use it or lose it" was a factor
in the USA loss of 220, and that the USA set the trend for the change
up north.


Indeed OTOH I will almost welcome it as maybe the local 222 boys will
stop bitching that CA Hams talking outside our frequency ranges


Hi! I always wondered what foolishness allowed Canadian voice
transmission in the USA Novice CW subband. Amateur bands and modes
should be ordered and standardized worldwide. That certainly meets
the basis and purpose, and would probably keep Frenchmen on 6M from
talking out of band.


an old friend February 10th 06 03:06 AM

any news from CA about 220-222?
 

wrote:
an old friend wrote:
wrote:
an old friend wrote:
anything or are the wheels still grinding there slow tune

People are probably still denying that "use it or lose it" was a factor
in the USA loss of 220, and that the USA set the trend for the change
up north.


Indeed OTOH I will almost welcome it as maybe the local 222 boys will
stop bitching that CA Hams talking outside our frequency ranges


Hi! I always wondered what foolishness allowed Canadian voice
transmission in the USA Novice CW subband. Amateur bands and modes
should be ordered and standardized worldwide. That certainly meets
the basis and purpose, and would probably keep Frenchmen on 6M from
talking out of band.


or at least by ITU regions (or was hat what you had in mind?)


[email protected] February 11th 06 01:57 AM

any news from CA about 220-222?
 

an old friend wrote:
wrote:
an old friend wrote:
wrote:
an old friend wrote:
anything or are the wheels still grinding there slow tune

People are probably still denying that "use it or lose it" was a factor
in the USA loss of 220, and that the USA set the trend for the change
up north.

Indeed OTOH I will almost welcome it as maybe the local 222 boys will
stop bitching that CA Hams talking outside our frequency ranges


Hi! I always wondered what foolishness allowed Canadian voice
transmission in the USA Novice CW subband. Amateur bands and modes
should be ordered and standardized worldwide. That certainly meets
the basis and purpose, and would probably keep Frenchmen on 6M from
talking out of band.


or at least by ITU regions (or was hat what you had in mind?)


HF is what I had in mind. Worldwide.



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 04:46 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
RadioBanter.com