anything or are the wheels still grinding there slow tune

an old friend wrote:
anything or are the wheels still grinding there slow tune

People are probably still denying that "use it or lose it" was a factor
in the USA loss of 220, and that the USA set the trend for the change
up north.

wrote:
an old friend wrote:
anything or are the wheels still grinding there slow tune

People are probably still denying that "use it or lose it" was a factor
in the USA loss of 220, and that the USA set the trend for the change
up north.

Indeed OTOH I will almost welcome it as maybe the local 222 boys will
stop bitching that CA Hams talking outside our frequency ranges

an old friend wrote:
wrote:
an old friend wrote:
anything or are the wheels still grinding there slow tune

People are probably still denying that "use it or lose it" was a factor
in the USA loss of 220, and that the USA set the trend for the change
up north.

Indeed OTOH I will almost welcome it as maybe the local 222 boys will
stop bitching that CA Hams talking outside our frequency ranges

Hi! I always wondered what foolishness allowed Canadian voice
transmission in the USA Novice CW subband. Amateur bands and modes
should be ordered and standardized worldwide. That certainly meets
the basis and purpose, and would probably keep Frenchmen on 6M from
talking out of band.

wrote:
an old friend wrote:
wrote:
an old friend wrote:
anything or are the wheels still grinding there slow tune

People are probably still denying that "use it or lose it" was a factor
in the USA loss of 220, and that the USA set the trend for the change
up north.

Indeed OTOH I will almost welcome it as maybe the local 222 boys will
stop bitching that CA Hams talking outside our frequency ranges

Hi! I always wondered what foolishness allowed Canadian voice
transmission in the USA Novice CW subband. Amateur bands and modes
should be ordered and standardized worldwide. That certainly meets
the basis and purpose, and would probably keep Frenchmen on 6M from
talking out of band.

or at least by ITU regions (or was hat what you had in mind?)

an old friend wrote:
wrote:
an old friend wrote:
wrote:
an old friend wrote:
anything or are the wheels still grinding there slow tune

People are probably still denying that "use it or lose it" was a factor
in the USA loss of 220, and that the USA set the trend for the change
up north.

Indeed OTOH I will almost welcome it as maybe the local 222 boys will
stop bitching that CA Hams talking outside our frequency ranges

Hi! I always wondered what foolishness allowed Canadian voice
transmission in the USA Novice CW subband. Amateur bands and modes
should be ordered and standardized worldwide. That certainly meets
the basis and purpose, and would probably keep Frenchmen on 6M from
talking out of band.

or at least by ITU regions (or was hat what you had in mind?)

HF is what I had in mind. Worldwide.