I beg to differ, the courts have ruled a number of times that data, is
not copyrightable. One case comes to mine had to do with a phone book a
telephone company had put out and another company copied it from word
to word and the phone company sued for copyright violation and the
supreme court ruled that general data, no matter how you write it is
not copyrightable.

On 28 Feb 2006 06:06:12 -0800, N9OGL wrote:
I beg to differ, the courts have ruled a number of times that data, is
not copyrightable. One case comes to mine had to do with a phone book a
telephone company had put out and another company copied it from word
to word and the phone company sued for copyright violation and the
supreme court ruled that general data, no matter how you write it is
not copyrightable.

(*shrug*)

Tables of numbers do not constitute prose. What you ripped off does.
Try to reproduce a college text and distribute it, and see how long
it takes you to be hauled into court by its publisher.



----
God said, "div D = rho, div B = 0, curl E = -@B/@t, curl H = J + @D/@t,"
and then there was light.

On 28 Feb 2006 01:59:58 -0800, N9OGL plagiarized:
[THEFT SNIP #2341]

Word for word from:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electromagnetic_radiation

See, I told you that you are a plagiarzing bitch. Bwa HAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!

N9OGL wrote:
From Discussion group: Amateur Radio Experimentation

Electromagnetic radiation is a propagating wave in space with electric
and magnetic components.

Todd, you gotta try harder if you want to draw Eric Onyon into the
discussion.

yeah brian, and we need to get rid of certain elements so the topic
will remain on topic.

Todd N9OGL