| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
|
|
#1
March 25th 06, 03:15 AM
posted to rec.radio.amateur.misc,rec.radio.amateur.policy
|
|||
|
|||
ARRL not wanting to help impove the service. Why?
|
|
#2
March 25th 06, 08:29 PM
posted to rec.radio.amateur.misc,rec.radio.amateur.policy
|
|||
|
|||
|
ARRL not wanting to help impove the service. Why?
|
|
#4
March 26th 06, 12:23 AM
posted to rec.radio.amateur.misc,rec.radio.amateur.policy
|
|||
|
|||
|
ARRL not wanting to help impove the service. Why?
Slow Code wrote: wrote in ups.com: wrote: I guess "Slow Code" Dan isn't an ARRL member. Ten-Nine Good-buddy? Breaker, Breaker, You a product of out-come based licensing? "You a product " I was a member for many many years, I am glad the hear that now run along and get help for your misanthropism |
|
#5
March 26th 06, 03:57 AM
posted to rec.radio.amateur.misc,rec.radio.amateur.policy
|
|||
|
|||
|
"Hello..." ARRL not wanting to help impove the service. Why?
Slow Code wrote: wrote in ups.com: wrote: Slow Code wrote: wrote in oups.com: Slow Code wrote: Is it because they think they can get more money with dumber hams? SC "Hello..." Breaker Breaker... "Hello..." I guess "Slow Code" Dan isn't an ARRL member. Ten-Nine Good-buddy? Breaker, Breaker, You a product of out-come based licensing? "Hello..." I guess you missed out on the ARRL's campaign to bring more amateurs on board. I was a member for many many years, but I dumped them nine years ago when they started pushing their proposals to dumb things down. I always thought the code was doing enough to dumb down the service. I want those assholes to give me my dues money back now. I didn't pay them to screw everything up. BTW, I'm not Dan. SC In the April 2006 editorial by David Sumner, K1ZZ, David introduces the concept of "Hello." And in the 8th paragraph, he validates something I've said and have been blasted for again and again. I've said that you almost have to know a ham to become a ham. And I've said it again and again and again despite the attacks from the Extra-Elite that storm the halls of RRAP. Here are David's exact words: "The best place to start is with the people closest to you. Most of us were introduced to Amateur Radio by friends and family, or by someone once removed - the friend of a friend. Oh, we might have read a book or seen an article or some television coverage about Amateur Radio, but it took the personal touch to turn that glimmer of interest into a passion. It took someone's helping hand to guide us through the maze of unfamiliar terms, baffling regulations and arcane procedures. Now it's our turn." Now David Sumner, K1ZZ, speaking for the ARRL in QST magazine validates what I've said and have been attacked for saying. Did David say, "Most of us were introduced to Amateur Radio by friends and family, or by someone once removed - the friend of a friend???" Yes, he did. Did David say "baffling regulations???" Yes, he did. Well, I didn't need David's validation. I knew I was speaking the truth all along. This is funny, coming right on the heels of the FCC validating what they think the true worth of the ARS. |
|
#6
March 27th 06, 09:11 PM
posted to rec.radio.amateur.misc,rec.radio.amateur.policy
|
|||
|
|||
|
"Hello..." ARRL not wanting to help impove the service. Why?
wrote: Slow Code wrote: wrote in ups.com: wrote: Slow Code wrote: I was a member for many many years, but I dumped them nine years ago when they started pushing their proposals to dumb things down. I always thought the code was doing enough to dumb down the service. indeed breifity cut Now David Sumner, K1ZZ, speaking for the ARRL in QST magazine validates what I've said and have been attacked for saying. Did David say, "Most of us were introduced to Amateur Radio by friends and family, or by someone once removed - the friend of a friend???" Yes, he did. Did David say "baffling regulations???" Yes, he did. Well, I didn't need David's validation. I knew I was speaking the truth all along. but suley it is nice (and good fro Hamr Radio) that he may in fact have a glimer of the truth This is funny, coming right on the heels of the FCC validating what they think the true worth of the ARS. indeed the wake up call is both needed and clearly unheeded by many in the ARS |
| Reply |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| FCC: Broadband Power Line Systems | Policy | |||
| a great read | CB | |||
| ARRL Propose New License Class & Code-Free HF Access | Antenna | |||
| Amateur Radio Newslineâ„¢ Report 1415 Â September 24, 2004 | Policy | |||
| Broadcast Station Field Strengths.. | Antenna | |||
Hybrid Mode
