On 31 Mar 2006 06:31:47 -0800, "K4YZ" wrote:


nobodys_old_friend wrote:
dealing honestly with the state of the of ARS is the proper funtion of
this NG

What's the "stae"...?!?! If you meant "state", perhaps it is, but

what do YOU know of it?

More than you, QUITE obviously!

Please, Morkie,
you can't even spell my name corretly
again steve how my sexaul orientation a proper subject for this NG

Again, Morkie, why do YOU complain about others discussing sexual
issues yet you bring it into almost EVERY thread you post in!

more lies

You're a sexual deviate and everyone here knows it...The ONLY one
who won't let anyone forget you're a deviate is YOU!

lying agin steve

MR slit andthe various being in his head are bound and determeined

as are you

So far, your "knowledge" of the state of
Amateur Radio has been trying to weasel out of the Code test for
General.

you can't even get that right steve I want it gone for extra too

So you're a DOUBLE weasel. My bust.

and you show your colors again

using the rights that exist under the law is weasiling

but taking a postion on code testing does not limit my kowledge of the
ARS

I could care less about your "position" on the Code issue.
you borought it up
And
your "kowledge" on almost all Amateur Radio related discussions has
been proven, BY YOU, to be zilch-point-squat.

where?

Ot I forgot I disgreed with you therefore I know nothing


Certainly not by the American Red Cross, Salvation Army, etc etc
etc.

ttry the FCC

The onlyn ones "laughing" are those standing on the outside
looking in!

and making the decsiosns too

I know the FCC just said we were no more important to Homelannd
security than Taxi drivers

How's that?

you comented on the thread

And what do YOU know about "Homelannd security"...???
I don't have time to list that or BW

WHY should they take Amateur Radio into this new agency?
to show we are more important than cab drivers
How
would we be of any greater service under this different umbrella?

We would be in abetter postion to retain spectrum if we were
that would allow to reamin of the same service

Here's MY point of view: There's already ENOUGH bureaucratic crap
for them to worry about in organizing "homeland defense" without having
to administer the Amateur Service.

meaning you advocate them leaving us out of it

from which follows we will cease sooner or later to play a role

We have already PROVEN that when the malodorous human solid waste
strikes the electrically operated air circulating device in an
agrevious manner, we can respond, and respond in style.

but what style?

"Homeland defense" wasn't even a topic of conversation on
September 10th, 2001, yet on September 11th Amateur Radio stepped up
and carried itself with style and professionalism for WEEKS after the
attacks. So said FEMA, the NY OEM, the Govermor of the State of New
York, and countless others.

so? that was yesterday

you like resting on laurels

it is dangerous you fool

We were doing it for DECADES before Spetember 11th 2001, and we've
been doing it consistently since. The kudos since Katrina/Rita prove.

you need to learn something of reality

Steve, K4YZ

_________________________________________
Usenet Zone Free Binaries Usenet Server
More than 140,000 groups
Unlimited download
http://www.usenetzone.com to open account