Elimination of CW is a loss in the number of ways we can communicate with other.

May 12th 06, 03:35 PM posted to rec.radio.amateur.policy

Cecil Moore

Posts: n/a

Elimination of CW is a loss in the number of ways we can communicate with other.

"jawod" wrote:
Consider the letter "E": a single "dit" in Morse, but it becomes
one "tap" followed by 5 "taps" in the above scheme. None too efficient,
it seems to me.

OTOH, the tap code is infinitely more efficient for sending T, M, O, etc.

Incidentally, didn't 'HI HI' originate from the way 'HA HA' sounds in
telegraph code?
--
73, Cecil, W5DXP

Reply With Quote

Thread Tools	Search this Thread
Show Printable Version	Search this Thread: Advanced Search
Display Modes
Switch to Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Threaded Mode

Posting Rules
Smilies are On [IMG] code is On HTML code is Off Trackbacks are On Pingbacks are On Refbacks are On

Similar Threads
Thread	Thread Starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
Rare Books on Electronics and Radio and Commmunications	Hania Lux	Equipment	0	October 22nd 03 07:48 PM
Rare Books on Electronics and Radio and Commmunications	Hania Lux	Equipment	0	October 22nd 03 07:48 PM
Comet B-10 VHF Antenna Question	Ed	Antenna	6	October 21st 03 04:40 AM
The two sorts of loss	Reg Edwards	Antenna	10	August 21st 03 07:41 PM
NCVEC NPRM for elimination of horse and buggy morse code requirement.	Keith	Policy	1	July 31st 03 03:46 AM

All times are GMT +1. The time now is 04:42 AM.

Menu

About Us