![]() |
ARS License Numbers
These are the numbers of current, unexpired
amateur radio licenses held by individuals on the stated dates, and the percentage of the total number of active licenses that class contains: As of May 14, 2000: Novice - 49,329 (7.3%) Technician - 205,394 (30.4%) Technician Plus - 128,860 (19.1%) General - 112,677 (16.7%) Advanced - 99,782 (14.8%) Extra - 78,750 (11.7%) Total Tech/TechPlus - 334,254 (49.5%) Total General/Advanced/Extra - 291,209 (43.2%) Total all classes - 674,792 As of July 1, 2006: Novice - 24,877 (3.8%) [decrease of 24,452] Technician - 282,448 (42.9%) [increase of 77,054] Technician Plus - 37,801 (5.7%) [decrease of 91,059] General - 132,757 (20.2%) [increase of 20,080] Advanced - 71,749 (10.9%) [decrease of 28,033] Extra - 108,185 (16.4%) [increase of 29,435] Total Tech/TechPlus - 320,049 (48.7%) [decrease of 14,205] Total General/Advanced/Extra - 312,691 (47.5%) [increase of 21,482] Total all classes - 657,817 (decrease of 16,975) Note that these totals do not include licenses that have expired but are in the grace period. They also do not include club, military, RACES or other station-only licenses. Note also that effective April 15, 2000, new Novice, Technician Plus and Advanced licenses are no longer issued. Since April 15, 2000, FCC has renewed all existing Technician Plus licenses as Technician. It is therefore informative to consider the totals of the two classes, since the Technician class includes a significant number of Technician Plus licenses renewed as Technician. 73 de Jim, N2EY |
ARS License Numbers
|
ARS License Numbers
|
ARS License Numbers
Slow Code wrote: wrote in ups.com: 73 de Jim, N2EY They cheapened the license, now nobody decent wants to get one and the FCC is still thinking of dumbing it down even more. Pretty soon it will be just CB'ers, lids, and retards that get licensed because testing will get dumbed down to the point even they can get an extra, then the rest of us will have to listen to bands that sound like 11 meters. funny they sound that way nNOW esp the HF bands |
why are you such a troll SC?
"an old friend" wrote in message oups.com... Slow Code wrote: why is it you keep adding Ngs to threads? Why do you feel anybody has to answer you, Mark? You're a nobody. Nothing. |
why are you such a troll SC?
Jolly Roger wrote: "an old friend" wrote in message oups.com... Slow Code wrote: why is it you keep adding Ngs to threads? Why do you feel anybody has to answer you, Mark? I don't feel anybody has to answer OTOH SC would be will advised to answer is he could You're a nobody. Nothing. and yet you feel a need to reply to me, and those you don't reply to most are replied to y some or other Indeed if you truly thought I was nobody you would bother repling to me your reply is proof you are lying that and the efforts to forge my posts proves somebody thinks I am important enough to merit such treatement |
why are you such a troll SC?
"an old freind" wrote in message oups.com... Jolly Roger wrote: "an old friend" wrote in message oups.com... Slow Code wrote: why is it you keep adding Ngs to threads? Why do you feel anybody has to answer you, Mark? I don't feel anybody has to answer OTOH SC would be will advised to answer is he could You're a nobody. Nothing. and yet you feel a need to reply to me, and those you don't reply to most are replied to y some or other Indeed if you truly thought I was nobody you would bother repling to me your reply is proof you are lying that and the efforts to forge my posts proves somebody thinks I am important enough to merit such treatement One last time, Mark. You are a nobody. A nonentity. You don't count. plonk |
why are you such a troll SC?
Jolly Roger wrote: "an old freind" wrote in message oups.com... Jolly Roger wrote: "an old friend" wrote in message oups.com... You're a nobody. Nothing. and yet you feel a need to reply to me, and those you don't reply to most are replied to y some or other Indeed if you truly thought I was nobody you would bother repling to me your reply is proof you are lying that and the efforts to forge my posts proves somebody thinks I am important enough to merit such treatement One last time, Mark. You are a nobody. A nonentity. and yet you feel a need to reply to me, and those you don't reply to most are replied to y some or other Indeed if you truly thought I was nobody you would bother repling to me your reply is proof you are lying that and the efforts to forge my posts proves somebody thinks I am important enough to merit such treatement You don't count. obviously I do plonk promises promieses |
why are you such a troll SC?
Jolly Roger wrote: "an old freind" wrote in message oups.com... Jolly Roger wrote: "an old friend" wrote in message oups.com... You're a nobody. Nothing. and yet you feel a need to reply to me, and those you don't reply to most are replied to y some or other Indeed if you truly thought I was nobody you would bother repling to me your reply is proof you are lying that and the efforts to forge my posts proves somebody thinks I am important enough to merit such treatement One last time, Mark. You are a nobody. A nonentity. and yet you feel a need to reply to me, and those you don't reply to most are replied to y some or other Indeed if you truly thought I was nobody you would bother repling to me your reply is proof you are lying that and the efforts to forge my posts proves somebody thinks I am important enough to merit such treatement you have only forgered 4 posts from me this very night You don't count. obviously I do plonk promises promieses |
get help sicko
Not Cocksucker Lloyd wrote: assraped by an old freind wrote: get help sicko |
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 10:56 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
RadioBanter.com