ARS License Numbers
 

wrote:
These are the numbers of current, unexpired
amateur radio licenses held by individuals
on the stated dates, and the percentage of
the total number of active licenses that
class contains:
gotto be a bot at work here

ARS License Numbers
 

ARS License Numbers
 

an old friend wrote:
get help sicko

Poor Markie............

ARS License Numbers
 

Slow Code wrote:
wrote in
ups.com:

These are the numbers of current, unexpired

Total all classes - 658,032 (decrease of 16,760)



That's what happens when you dumb things down. Having a license doesn't
mean anything and they leave. Technology certainly didn't keep them in
the service.

Dumbing things down more will just let retards on HF.

well your "plan" would simply kill off the ARS

SC

ARS License Numbers
 

No, it's what happens when give people tests that are irrelevant to the
state of the service and the world today. It's what happens when old
timers keep the impression alive that ham radio is about code, tubes and
other worthless old "technologies". It's what happens when we try to
gate people out by making them pass the same worthless crap we had to
pass because, "well I had to do it so they should have to do it" mentality.

We already have a bunch of "retards" on HF and have for the thirty plus
years that I can remember. Testing didn't keep the low-lifes out then,
and it is not going to do it now.

Learn to face reality. The old tests are what has brought on the
problems - especially the worthless code tests.

It's not about "dumbing down" the testing. It's about the need to
modernize the testing, and our hanging onto the old and outdated for far
too long, that has caused the problems we face today.

Blow Code wrote:

That's what happens when you dumb things down. Having a license doesn't
mean anything and they leave. Technology certainly didn't keep them in
the service.

Dumbing things down more will just let retards on HF.

BC

ARS License Numbers
 

"J. D. B." wrote in
:

No, it's what happens when give people tests that are irrelevant to the
state of the service and the world today. It's what happens when old
timers keep the impression alive that ham radio is about code, tubes and
other worthless old "technologies". It's what happens when we try to
gate people out by making them pass the same worthless crap we had to
pass because, "well I had to do it so they should have to do it"
mentality.

We already have a bunch of "retards" on HF and have for the thirty plus
years that I can remember. Testing didn't keep the low-lifes out then,
and it is not going to do it now.

Learn to face reality. The old tests are what has brought on the
problems - especially the worthless code tests.

It's not about "dumbing down" the testing. It's about the need to
modernize the testing, and our hanging onto the old and outdated for far
too long, that has caused the problems we face today.



Having to learn CW isn't preventing you from modernizing, You're just
lazy. Now go play with your model cho-cho trains.

SC

ARS License Numbers
 

Slow Code wrote:
"J. D. B." wrote in
:

No, it's what happens when give people tests that are irrelevant to the
state of the service and the world today. It's what happens when old
timers keep the impression alive that ham radio is about code, tubes and
other worthless old "technologies". It's what happens when we try to
gate people out by making them pass the same worthless crap we had to
pass because, "well I had to do it so they should have to do it"
mentality.

We already have a bunch of "retards" on HF and have for the thirty plus
years that I can remember. Testing didn't keep the low-lifes out then,
and it is not going to do it now.

Learn to face reality. The old tests are what has brought on the
problems - especially the worthless code tests.

It's not about "dumbing down" the testing. It's about the need to
modernize the testing, and our hanging onto the old and outdated for far
too long, that has caused the problems we face today.



Having to learn CW isn't preventing you from modernizing, You're just
lazy. Now go play with your model cho-cho trains.
more libel you sound just liek wismen and robeson

SC

ARS License Numbers
 

These are the numbers of current, unexpired
amateur radio licenses held by individuals
on the stated dates, and the percentage of
the total number of active licenses that
class contains:

As of May 14, 2000:

Novice - 49,329 (7.3%)
Technician - 205,394 (30.4%)
Technician Plus - 128,860 (19.1%)
General - 112,677 (16.7%)
Advanced - 99,782 (14.8%)
Extra - 78,750 (11.7%)

Total Tech/TechPlus - 334,254 (49.5%)

Total General/Advanced/Extra - 291,209 (43.2%)

Total all classes - 674,792


As of August 2, 2006:

Novice - 24,715 (3.8%) [decrease of 24,614]
Technician - 283,467 (43.1%) [increase of 78,073]
Technician Plus - 37,012 (5.6%) [decrease of 91,848]
General - 132,510 (20.2%) [increase of 19,833]
Advanced - 71,381 (10.9%) [decrease of 28,401]
Extra - 108,206 (16.5%) [increase of 29,456]

(percentages may not add up to exactly 100.0% due to rounding)

Total Tech/TechPlus - 320,479 (48.8%) [decrease of 13,775]

Total General/Advanced/Extra - 312,097 (47.4%) [increase of 20,888]

Total all classes - 657,291 (decrease of 17,501)

Note that these totals do not include licenses
that have expired but are in the grace period.

They also do not include club, military, RACES
or other station-only licenses.

Note also that effective April 15, 2000, new
Novice, Technician Plus and Advanced licenses
are no longer issued.

Since April 15, 2000, FCC has renewed all existing
Technician Plus licenses as Technician. It is therefore
informative to consider the totals of the two classes,
since the Technician class includes a significant
number of Technician Plus licenses renewed as
Technician.

73 de Jim, N2EY

ARS License Numbers
 

wrote:
These are the numbers of current, unexpired
amateur radio licenses held by individuals
on the stated dates, and the percentage of
the total number of active licenses that
class contains:

As of May 14, 2000:
look like the bot has struck again

ARS License Numbers
 

wrote:
an old friend wrote:
wrote:
These are the numbers of current, unexpired
amateur radio licenses held by individuals
on the stated dates, and the percentage of
the total number of active licenses that
class contains:

As of May 14, 2000:
look like the bot has struck again

No.
well while I may be been mistaken it certainly did look the work of a
bot