Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1   Report Post  
Old July 15th 06, 08:39 PM posted to rec.radio.amateur.misc,rec.radio.amateur.policy,rec.radio.shortwave
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Jul 2006
Posts: 1,614
Default Elimination of CW is a loss in the number of ways we can communicatewithother.

J. D. B. wrote:
Thanks Dee, you admitted that CW is not the best mode in any condition.


Actually, CW is the best mode for me under average
conditions. It's my favorite mode.
--
73, Cecil http://www.qsl.net/w5dxp
  #2   Report Post  
Old July 15th 06, 09:20 PM posted to rec.radio.amateur.misc,rec.radio.amateur.policy,rec.radio.shortwave
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Jul 2006
Posts: 618
Default Elimination of CW is a loss in the number of ways we can communicatewith other.


"Cecil Moore" wrote in message
.com...
J. D. B. wrote:
Thanks Dee, you admitted that CW is not the best mode in any condition.


Actually, CW is the best mode for me under average
conditions. It's my favorite mode.
--
73, Cecil http://www.qsl.net/w5dxp


Unfortunately the anti-code crowd sees any rational comparison of the modes
as supporting their position. I do not support dropping the code
requirement.

Dee, N8UZE


  #3   Report Post  
Old July 16th 06, 01:13 AM posted to rec.radio.amateur.misc,rec.radio.amateur.policy,rec.radio.shortwave
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Jul 2006
Posts: 1,614
Default Elimination of CW is a loss in the number of ways we can communicatewithother.

Dee Flint wrote:
Unfortunately the anti-code crowd sees any rational comparison of the modes
as supporting their position. I do not support dropping the code
requirement.


It's like riding a bicycle when you could be driving an SUV.
If you like to do it, then do it, but don't force others to
adopt your particular favorite aspect of our hobby. There's
room for many favorite aspects.

For communications capability under difficult conditions, CW
cannot hold a candle to PACTOR II. For fun, PACTOR II cannot
hold a candle to CW. That's my personal experience and opinion.
--
73, Cecil http://www.qsl.net/w5dxp
Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Elimination of CW is a loss in the number of ways we cancommunicatewith other. dxAce Antenna 196 August 3rd 06 12:15 AM
Elimination of CW is a loss in the number of ways we cancommunicatewith other. dxAce General 159 August 3rd 06 12:15 AM
Rare Books on Electronics and Radio and Commmunications Hania Lux Equipment 0 October 22nd 03 07:48 PM
Rare Books on Electronics and Radio and Commmunications Hania Lux Equipment 0 October 22nd 03 07:48 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 07:27 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Radio"

 

Copyright © 2017