RadioBanter

RadioBanter (https://www.radiobanter.com/)
-   Policy (https://www.radiobanter.com/policy/)
-   -   CW isn't preventing the modernization of ham radio. Laziness is. (https://www.radiobanter.com/policy/98658-cw-isnt-preventing-modernization-ham-radio-laziness.html)

Bernie the Bignose July 18th 06 08:10 PM

Auction the ham bands to the Highest Bidder
 

wrote in message
oups.com...
amateur radio is obsolete and nobody cares about it.

The ham frequencies should be auctioned to the highest bidder!



......but what if nobody bids ?


Al Klein July 18th 06 10:47 PM

Auction the ham bands to the Highest Bidder
 
On Tue, 18 Jul 2006 12:03:27 +0900, "Brenda Ann"
wrote:

The bands 220 and below are not viable at all commercially because of the size of antenna needed.


Don't forget, UPS (or was it FedEx) wanted part of 220.

Slow Code July 19th 06 01:25 AM

Auction the ham bands to the Highest Bidder
 
wrote in
oups.com:

amateur radio is obsolete and nobody cares about it.

The ham frequencies should be auctioned to the highest bidder!




Sorry, CB'ers already got dibs on the bands after CW goes away.

SC

an_old_friend July 19th 06 01:38 AM

get help sicko
 
Slow Code wrote:

Sorry, CB'ers already got dibs on the bands after CW goes away.

SC

you are sicko get help and you will feel better you are surely suffring
from the long terms effects of narrow band rf expousure


Big Rich Soprano July 20th 06 11:19 AM

Auction the ham bands to the Highest Bidder
 
amateur radio is obsolete and nobody cares about it.

The ham frequencies should be auctioned to the highest bidder!



Don't you get tired of being an ass hole?

[email protected] July 20th 06 11:36 PM

CW isn't preventing the modernization of ham radio. Laziness is.
 

Slow Code wrote:
Barry OGrady wrote in
:

On 14 Jul 2006 17:07:18 -0700, "an old freind"
wrote:


Slow Code wrote:
wrote in
oups.com:



It's been downhill ever since.


I agree with that.

Whether you like or use CW or not, dumbing down as hurt ham radio.
in english please



SC
people that live in glass house whoudl dress in basement


In english please, with punctuation and spacing between quoted and your
text and proper quoting and spelling.

Barry


Get over yourself.

ROFL, Sorry. I'm starting to believe laughing at him just encourages him
to make more typo's. We need to stop laughing and pity him instead.

Maybe if he had to learn CW the mental process would help his spelling.

SC


I wonder how many a retired old-timer who decided to join ham radio
stroked out instead while doing speed runs trying to get to 13/20wpm on
CW?


Slow Code July 21st 06 09:57 PM

CW isn't preventing the modernization of ham radio. Laziness is.
 
wrote in
oups.com:


Slow Code wrote:
Barry OGrady wrote in
:

On 14 Jul 2006 17:07:18 -0700, "an old freind"
wrote:


Slow Code wrote:
wrote in
oups.com:



It's been downhill ever since.


I agree with that.

Whether you like or use CW or not, dumbing down as hurt ham radio.
in english please



SC
people that live in glass house whoudl dress in basement

In english please, with punctuation and spacing between quoted and
your text and proper quoting and spelling.

Barry


Get over yourself.

ROFL, Sorry. I'm starting to believe laughing at him just encourages
him to make more typo's. We need to stop laughing and pity him
instead.

Maybe if he had to learn CW the mental process would help his spelling.

SC


I wonder how many a retired old-timer who decided to join ham radio
stroked out instead while doing speed runs trying to get to 13/20wpm on
CW?



Why don't you get on your CB and ask them.

SC

[email protected] July 22nd 06 01:40 AM

CW isn't preventing the modernization of ham radio. Laziness is.
 

Slow Code wrote:
wrote in
oups.com:


Slow Code wrote:
Barry OGrady wrote in
:

On 14 Jul 2006 17:07:18 -0700, "an old freind"
wrote:


Slow Code wrote:
wrote in
oups.com:



It's been downhill ever since.


I agree with that.

Whether you like or use CW or not, dumbing down as hurt ham radio.
in english please



SC
people that live in glass house whoudl dress in basement

In english please, with punctuation and spacing between quoted and
your text and proper quoting and spelling.

Barry


Get over yourself.

ROFL, Sorry. I'm starting to believe laughing at him just encourages
him to make more typo's. We need to stop laughing and pity him
instead.

Maybe if he had to learn CW the mental process would help his spelling.

SC


I wonder how many a retired old-timer who decided to join ham radio
stroked out instead while doing speed runs trying to get to 13/20wpm on
CW?



Why don't you get on your CB and ask them.

SC


I don't think a CB will go that far.


an old friend July 22nd 06 05:04 PM

CW is Laziness
 

Slow Code wrote:
wrote in
oups.com:


I wonder how many a retired old-timer who decided to join ham radio
stroked out instead while doing speed runs trying to get to 13/20wpm on
CW?



Why don't you get on your CB and ask them.

the idea the radio could contact the dead was bad enough in frequency
do you need to repeat it

but one of your other nicks is hey stupid so I guess we must expect
that

SC



[email protected] September 23rd 06 02:25 PM

KB9RQZ Says Learning Code is EASY!
 

wrote:
On 16 Jul 2006 23:57:00 -0700, "K4YZ" wrote:


Cecil Moore wrote:
Al Klein wrote:
... laziness promotes not learning.

Some German General went on the record as preferring
his officers to be *intelligent and lazy*. He said the most
dangerous officers are the ambitious and stupid ones.
Now if I could just remember his name.


Welcome back, Cecil.

I think it was Herr Reichskindmolestor Morkie Von Aintgottaclue.

But that's just a guess.


Why does Morkie keep insisting that I am "lying" when all I am
doing is quoting HIM verbatim?

I'm not.

Here's YOUR words AGAIN, Morkie:

Message-ID: .com

KB9RQZ Said: "oh learning code is easy"

There you have it, folks! Morkie says learning code is easy!

Quoted Word For Word!

Steve, K4YZ



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 02:17 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
RadioBanter.com