LOL!

I laugh when you lazy asses whine CW is keeping you from modernizing.

The code requirement isn't stopping anyone from modernizing. Hams don't
want to modernize and won't modernize unless they're forced to modernize.
That's what's stopping the modernization.

How does having a CW requirement prevent you from hooking a computer to a
rig? It don't. You don't want to modernize because you're stupid or lazy.
Just like you don't want to learn CW because you're stupid or lazy.

SC

Slow Code wrote:
LOL!

I laugh when you lazy asses whine CW is keeping you from modernizing.

The code requirement isn't stopping anyone from modernizing. Hams don't
want to modernize and won't modernize unless they're forced to modernize.
That's what's stopping the modernization.

and cw usage as well as test promtoes that sort of laziness

ORIGINAL MESSAGE:

On Wed, 12 Jul 2006 23:09:17 GMT, Slow Code wrote:


Just like you don't want to learn CW because you're stupid or lazy.

------------ REPLY SEPARATOR ------------

Naw, CW makes it too easy to communicate. CW is for lazy people. Real
hams want to struggle to copy signals through noise and QRM. That's
why they hate CW... it's no challenge!

Bill, W6WRT

On 12 Jul 2006 16:12:12 -0700, "an old freind"
wrote:

I laugh when you lazy asses whine CW is keeping you from modernizing.

The code requirement isn't stopping anyone from modernizing. Hams don't
want to modernize and won't modernize unless they're forced to modernize.
That's what's stopping the modernization.

and cw usage as well as test promtoes that sort of laziness

Nonsense. Having to do something promotes laziness? Then exercise
promotes sloth and dieting promotes obesity. By your "logic", that
is.

Bill Turner wrote in
:

ORIGINAL MESSAGE:

On Wed, 12 Jul 2006 23:09:17 GMT, Slow Code wrote:


Just like you don't want to learn CW because you're stupid or lazy.

------------ REPLY SEPARATOR ------------

Naw, CW makes it too easy to communicate. CW is for lazy people. Real
hams want to struggle to copy signals through noise and QRM. That's
why they hate CW... it's no challenge!

Bill, W6WRT


Or when a couple ops with amplifiers move in a little too close to your
on-going qso. That does make things tough, and then they laugh at you
when you politely ask them to move up the band a little. LOL

Slow Code wrote:
LOL!

I laugh when you lazy asses whine CW is keeping you from modernizing.

The code requirement isn't stopping anyone from modernizing. Hams don't
want to modernize and won't modernize unless they're forced to modernize.
That's what's stopping the modernization.

How does having a CW requirement prevent you from hooking a computer to a
rig? It don't. You don't want to modernize because you're stupid or lazy.
Just like you don't want to learn CW because you're stupid or lazy.

SC

LOL! It started a long, long time ago.

When gasoline was 17 Cents a gallon, hams were complainining about how
hard it was to get to the FCC office and wanted a mail-order license.
The conditional was born.

It's been downhill ever since.

On 13 Jul 2006 07:12:36 -0700, "an old freind"
wrote:

Al Klein wrote:
On 12 Jul 2006 16:12:12 -0700, "an old freind"
wrote:

and cw usage as well as test promtoes that sort of laziness

Nonsense.

indeed the idea that refusing to expand ones horizon is nonsense

The idea that testing someone promotes laziness is nonsense.

Having to do something promotes laziness?

nope not chnaging and resting on lareuls does

So resting on your laurels and not learning CW promotes your laziness.
That's what I said and you agree.

On 13 Jul 2006 18:55:07 -0700, "an old friend"
wrote:

Al Klein wrote:

The idea that testing someone promotes laziness is nonsense.

not the test that was the subject
use of the mode promotes lazness

Learning something promotes laziness? Typical.

learning CW promotes laziness

Yep, as I said, typical. Of a lazy person. Learning doesn't promote
laziness, laziness promotes not learning.

Cecil Moore wrote:
Al Klein wrote:
... laziness promotes not learning.

Some German General went on the record as preferring
his officers to be *intelligent and lazy*. He said the most
dangerous officers are the ambitious and stupid ones.
Now if I could just remember his name.
Cecicl I think I rememebr that quote

but I think it is an ADmiral von Tirpitz the father of the WW1 navy
--
73, Cecil, http://www.qsl.net/w5dxp

On Fri, 14 Jul 2006 14:38:57 GMT, Cecil Moore
wrote:

Al Klein wrote:
... laziness promotes not learning.

Some German General went on the record as preferring
his officers to be *intelligent and lazy*. He said the most
dangerous officers are the ambitious and stupid ones.
Now if I could just remember his name.

Ribbentrop? It sounds like him.