| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
#8
November 8th 07, 12:51 AM
posted to alt.binaries.pictures.radio
|
|||
|
|||
This poor Emerson deserved so much better
Brenda Ann wrote:
"Jeffrey D Angus" wrote in message ... A few weeks ago I posted a comment with an experiment using a light bulb, oatmeal carton and a rock. This obviously shows the same mechanics at work. Mass + Inertia. No matter how many times you go around the outside of a radio with bubble wrap, if you can't keep the insides in place properly, this is the result. Jeff It would have had a MUCH better chance though if they had 1) Used bubble wrap that wasn't all popped 2) Used more than a single wrap 3) Wrapped the entire radio, not just around the front/back 4) Used a box more than 1cm larger than the radio Well, #4 explains why they had to pop all that bubble wrap. 8-) |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| Emerson project start | Radio Photos | |||
| FA: Emerson Radio service notes 1955-1959 | Swap | |||
| FA: Emerson Radio service notes 1955-1959 | Swap | |||
| Emerson MBR-1 | Shortwave | |||
| Emerson Radio Patrol 2002 | Scanner | |||
![Rick[_6_] is offline](https://www.radiobanter.com/images/SultanThemeVB3R/statusicon/user_offline.gif)
Threaded Mode
