LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #2   Report Post  
Old February 22nd 12, 04:20 AM posted to alt.binaries.pictures.radio
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Aug 2009
Posts: 344
Default 1922 Popular Science radio article



"Michael A. Terrell" wrote in message
m...



--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

After all this time, I've only just noticed that there is an error in the
text of this article. In the caption it states that it has a listening
radius of 1700 meters. Now, unless the British have a different use for the
word 'radius', and assuming that the story is correct about the receivable
wavelengths, then I figure they must have meant that the radio was capable
of receiving signals of up to 1700 meters in wavelength.

 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Today I saw a Uniden ad in Popular Science magazine. [email protected] Scanner 1 January 25th 11 03:24 AM
Popular Mechanics Article on New Technology that May Impact Shortwave Radio Joe Analssandrini Shortwave 6 August 12th 07 08:15 AM
1946 Popular Science Radio Make It Fix It Manual Mike Terry Broadcasting 0 November 4th 04 03:38 AM
1946 Popular Science Radio Make It Fix It Manual Mike Terry Shortwave 0 November 4th 04 03:38 AM
Popular Communications magazine July 2004: BPL article Stephen Newlyn Shortwave 0 July 4th 04 05:36 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 01:30 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Radio"

 

Copyright © 2017