You'll probably never have to use CW to save a life.

#25

August 27th 06, 05:11 PM posted to alt.radio.scanner,rec.radio.amateur.antenna,rec.radio.amateur.policy,rec.radio.scanner,rec.radio.swap

an_old_friend an_old_friend is offline

external usenet poster

First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Jun 2006

Posts: 1,554

You'll probably never have to use CW to save a life.

DrDeath wrote:
"Slow Code" wrote in message
...

"Cecil Moore" wrote in message
om...
The Kat wrote:
WHY in the **** are you continuing this thread in a SCANNER newsgroup??

Why in the @!#$% are you posting the identical objection
five times in an ANTENNA newsgroup??

Keep this crap out of rec.radio.amateur.policy!!!

Not a chance. Your group is up for the Buster Urinal award.
ebing full of **** what use have you got a for a urinal busted or not?

Reply With Quote

Thread Tools	Search this Thread
Show Printable Version	Search this Thread: Advanced Search
Display Modes
Switch to Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Threaded Mode

Posting Rules
Smilies are On [IMG] code is On HTML code is Off Trackbacks are On Pingbacks are On Refbacks are On

Similar Threads
Thread	Thread Starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
You'll probably never have to use CW to save a life.	Slow Code	Policy	189	December 14th 06 10:46 AM
You'll probably never have to use CW to save a life.	Slow Code	Antenna	58	September 17th 06 03:11 AM
If you had to use CW to save someone's life, would that person die?	RLW	General	3	August 26th 06 09:16 PM
If you had to use CW to save someone's life, would that person die?	Slow Code	Shortwave	42	August 23rd 06 02:28 PM
If you had to die to save someone's life, would that person send CW?	Buck	Antenna	0	July 21st 06 07:29 AM

All times are GMT +1. The time now is 10:01 AM.

Menu

About Us