You'll probably never have to use CW to save a life.

#15

September 4th 06, 03:29 AM posted to alt.radio.scanner,rec.radio.amateur.antenna,rec.radio.amateur.policy,rec.radio.scanner,rec.radio.swap

Slow Code

external usenet poster

First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Jul 2006

Posts: 4,113

You'll probably never use CW to save a life, if you're too lazy to learn it.

"an old friend" wrote in
oups.com:

Slow Code wrote:
" wrote in
oups.com:

Thank you, Rick! You spoke volumes of reality in this new
millennium.

And you're still just as stupid as you were before you read it.

trolling right along

Are you puting any effort into learning CW Mark or are you just being lazy
waiting for things to get dumbed down some more?

SC

Reply With Quote

Thread Tools	Search this Thread
Show Printable Version	Search this Thread: Advanced Search
Display Modes
Switch to Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Threaded Mode

Posting Rules
Smilies are On [IMG] code is On HTML code is Off Trackbacks are On Pingbacks are On Refbacks are On

Similar Threads
Thread	Thread Starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
You'll probably never have to use CW to save a life.	Slow Code	Policy	189	December 14th 06 10:46 AM
You'll probably never have to use CW to save a life.	Slow Code	Antenna	58	September 17th 06 03:11 AM
If you had to use CW to save someone's life, would that person die?	RLW	General	3	August 26th 06 09:16 PM
If you had to use CW to save someone's life, would that person die?	Slow Code	Shortwave	42	August 23rd 06 02:28 PM
If you had to die to save someone's life, would that person send CW?	Buck	Antenna	0	July 21st 06 07:29 AM

All times are GMT +1. The time now is 09:26 PM.

Menu

About Us