You'll probably never have to use CW to save a life.

#33

September 11th 06, 12:23 AM posted to rec.radio.amateur.antenna,rec.radio.amateur.policy,rec.radio.scanner,rec.radio.swap

Slow Code

external usenet poster

First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Jul 2006

Posts: 4,113

You'll probably never have to use CW to save a life.

"Unit 200" anon@anon wrote in :

Long time no hear, Len. Good to see that you are out and about and
belaboring Usenet with your tripe.
I'm sure that you feel much relieved after posting a ten paragraph
diatribe...you oldsters seem to feel like youngsters after passing a few
cubic feet of natural gas.
Did you rattle your Rely diapers while so doing?
You didn't "brit your ****ches", did you? I hate it when Flatulent Old
Men play their tunes while pretending they are not the fartee....

ROFLMAO

That was good.

Sc

Reply With Quote

Thread Tools	Search this Thread
Show Printable Version	Search this Thread: Advanced Search
Display Modes
Switch to Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Threaded Mode

Posting Rules
Smilies are On [IMG] code is On HTML code is Off Trackbacks are On Pingbacks are On Refbacks are On

Similar Threads
Thread	Thread Starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
You'll probably never have to use CW to save a life.	Slow Code	Policy	189	December 14th 06 10:46 AM
You'll probably never have to use CW to save a life.	Slow Code	Antenna	58	September 17th 06 03:11 AM
If you had to use CW to save someone's life, would that person die?	RLW	General	3	August 26th 06 09:16 PM
If you had to use CW to save someone's life, would that person die?	Slow Code	Shortwave	42	August 23rd 06 02:28 PM
If you had to die to save someone's life, would that person send CW?	Buck	Antenna	0	July 21st 06 07:29 AM

All times are GMT +1. The time now is 03:15 PM.

Menu

About Us