Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Could you support making the No-code license one year non-renewable?
On 8 Sep 2006 19:28:20 -0700, "Douche Bag"
wrote: The hobby is dead because of all these old ham geriatrics stuck on code. No one in the real world gives a **** about code. Slow Code wrote: I could support that. SC Code is dead - along with anything else that requires skill, practice, or a little bit of effort. The folks who want to do away with code should at least learn it and try it - they might find it to be (gasp) enjoyable. Personally, I could support doing away with no-code licensing altogether. I realize it won't happen, but I gotta think that if I managed to learn Morse code, then so can "they". The only thing no-code licensing accomplished in this neck of the woods was to move the CB mentality from 11 to 2 meters. -- -fb- |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
05-235 - Any new procode test arguments? | Policy | |||
Why You Don't Like The ARRL | CB | |||
Why You Don't Like The ARRL | Shortwave | |||
Response to "21st Century" Part One (Code Test) | Policy | |||
There is no International Code Requirement and techs can operate HF according to FCC Rules | General |