That story line of it "not" being the planes that brought the towers down,
is one of the BIGGEST bull **** stories ever to be printed.

IF you "watched" the towers fall, they fell from top to bottom. Straight
down (just about). IF there were "Dynamite" used - especially at the ground
floors, they would have went out first - and THAT WAS NOT THE CASE. ALSO -
you would most likely have seen implosions or adversely - walls "shattering"
"OUT" depending on how the charges were placed. That ALSO was not the case.
IF you recall, the FIRST attempt to bring the towers down WAS done with
"Explosives" placed in the garage area. Yes, it caused damage and some
injuries/deaths but as to bringing the towers down - It didn't work.

You bull **** conspiracy theorists really need to get a grip on life. THAT
was a ****ing attack on our country - pure and simple. OR "maybe" YOU were a
part of it! Trying to spin it out of the real truth!

L.


"Robert M. Gary" wrote in message
oups.com...
I thought it was strange that this guy was a physics professor. What
would a physics prof know about how the towers fell? That's the realm
of engineering. A physics prof would start the problem with "ok, assume
a zero gravity, zero atmophere environment..."

-Robert,




MnMikew wrote:
This is what happens to tinfoilers who spew this crap.

http://www.ksl.com/?nid=148&sid=476951

"Physics Professor Steven Jones has made numerous statements about the
collapse of the World Trade Center. BYU has repeatedly said that it does
not
endorse assertions made by individual faculty.

"We are, however, concerned about the increasingly speculative and
accusatory nature of these statements by Dr. Jones."

In article ,
"L." wrote:

That story line of it "not" being the planes that brought the towers down,
is one of the BIGGEST bull **** stories ever to be printed.

IF you "watched" the towers fall, they fell from top to bottom. Straight
down (just about). IF there were "Dynamite" used - especially at the ground
floors, they would have went out first - and THAT WAS NOT THE CASE. ALSO -
you would most likely have seen implosions or adversely - walls "shattering"
"OUT" depending on how the charges were placed. That ALSO was not the case.
IF you recall, the FIRST attempt to bring the towers down WAS done with
"Explosives" placed in the garage area. Yes, it caused damage and some
injuries/deaths but as to bringing the towers down - It didn't work.

You bull **** conspiracy theorists really need to get a grip on life. THAT
was a ****ing attack on our country - pure and simple. OR "maybe" YOU were a
part of it! Trying to spin it out of the real truth!


They started out with a story that it was "thermate" that brought them
down. When they found out that there is no such thing as "thermate,"
they switched the story to thermite. Now it is dynamite! If braind were
dynamite, the collective "9/11 'Truth' Movement" wouldn't ahve enough to
blow their noses!


"Robert M. Gary" wrote in message
oups.com...
I thought it was strange that this guy was a physics professor. What
would a physics prof know about how the towers fell? That's the realm
of engineering. A physics prof would start the problem with "ok, assume
a zero gravity, zero atmophere environment..."

-Robert,




MnMikew wrote:
This is what happens to tinfoilers who spew this crap.

http://www.ksl.com/?nid=148&sid=476951

"Physics Professor Steven Jones has made numerous statements about the
collapse of the World Trade Center. BYU has repeatedly said that it does
not
endorse assertions made by individual faculty.

"We are, however, concerned about the increasingly speculative and
accusatory nature of these statements by Dr. Jones."

Orval Fairbairn wrote:

They started out with a story that it was "thermate" that brought them
down. When they found out that there is no such thing as "thermate,"
they switched the story to thermite. Now it is dynamite! If braind
were dynamite, the collective "9/11 'Truth' Movement" wouldn't ahve
enough to blow their noses!


I recently was in an exchange with someone who didn't keep track of his
responses.

One of his last responses to me was to say that the "explosions" could have
been every ten floors and that "They" were sloppy.
One of his last posts to another person had him saying "They" had to wire
every floor with great precision.
I quoted his response to me in that thread and he went away.

The question that popped into my mind during that exchange was "Why bother
with airplanes?"

If they could wire two they could wire two hundred. Blow up a couple, tell
the world of the other 198 then blow one a week or one every time a search
crew went in.

The recent fear of water and toothpaste (but you can carry on KY-jelly) on
planes led me to another way to bring excitement onto an airplane.

Isn't it amazing how you can have an event like 911 on tape and people can
view the tape and deny the evidence of their own eyes?
We all SAW the planes hit the towers.
We all SAW the towers fall from the TOP down.
Many of us saw all this in person, not on tape.
The only conclusion I can draw is that some people are just idiots.


"L." wrote in message
...
That story line of it "not" being the planes that brought the towers down,
is one of the BIGGEST bull **** stories ever to be printed.

IF you "watched" the towers fall, they fell from top to bottom. Straight
down (just about). IF there were "Dynamite" used - especially at the
ground
floors, they would have went out first - and THAT WAS NOT THE CASE. ALSO -
you would most likely have seen implosions or adversely - walls
"shattering"
"OUT" depending on how the charges were placed. That ALSO was not the
case.
IF you recall, the FIRST attempt to bring the towers down WAS done with
"Explosives" placed in the garage area. Yes, it caused damage and some
injuries/deaths but as to bringing the towers down - It didn't work.

You bull **** conspiracy theorists really need to get a grip on life. THAT
was a ****ing attack on our country - pure and simple. OR "maybe" YOU were
a
part of it! Trying to spin it out of the real truth!

L.


"Robert M. Gary" wrote in message
oups.com...
I thought it was strange that this guy was a physics professor. What
would a physics prof know about how the towers fell? That's the realm
of engineering. A physics prof would start the problem with "ok, assume
a zero gravity, zero atmophere environment..."

-Robert,




MnMikew wrote:
This is what happens to tinfoilers who spew this crap.

http://www.ksl.com/?nid=148&sid=476951

"Physics Professor Steven Jones has made numerous statements about the
collapse of the World Trade Center. BYU has repeatedly said that it
does
not
endorse assertions made by individual faculty.

"We are, however, concerned about the increasingly speculative and
accusatory nature of these statements by Dr. Jones."

They need their ass kicked for even remotely trying to make humor of it in
any manner - be it joking or trying to twist it around in this sick manner.
Now "that" would be a lovely conclusion.

L.

"Bruce Markowitz" wrote in message
...
Isn't it amazing how you can have an event like 911 on tape and people can
view the tape and deny the evidence of their own eyes?
We all SAW the planes hit the towers.
We all SAW the towers fall from the TOP down.
Many of us saw all this in person, not on tape.
The only conclusion I can draw is that some people are just idiots.


"L." wrote in message
...
That story line of it "not" being the planes that brought the towers
down,
is one of the BIGGEST bull **** stories ever to be printed.

IF you "watched" the towers fall, they fell from top to bottom. Straight
down (just about). IF there were "Dynamite" used - especially at the
ground
floors, they would have went out first - and THAT WAS NOT THE CASE.
ALSO -
you would most likely have seen implosions or adversely - walls
"shattering"
"OUT" depending on how the charges were placed. That ALSO was not the
case.
IF you recall, the FIRST attempt to bring the towers down WAS done with
"Explosives" placed in the garage area. Yes, it caused damage and some
injuries/deaths but as to bringing the towers down - It didn't work.

You bull **** conspiracy theorists really need to get a grip on life.
THAT
was a ****ing attack on our country - pure and simple. OR "maybe" YOU
were
a
part of it! Trying to spin it out of the real truth!

L.


"Robert M. Gary" wrote in message
oups.com...
I thought it was strange that this guy was a physics professor. What
would a physics prof know about how the towers fell? That's the realm
of engineering. A physics prof would start the problem with "ok, assume
a zero gravity, zero atmophere environment..."

-Robert,




MnMikew wrote:
This is what happens to tinfoilers who spew this crap.

http://www.ksl.com/?nid=148&sid=476951

"Physics Professor Steven Jones has made numerous statements about the
collapse of the World Trade Center. BYU has repeatedly said that it
does
not
endorse assertions made by individual faculty.

"We are, however, concerned about the increasingly speculative and
accusatory nature of these statements by Dr. Jones."

9/11 Revisited - There were EXPLOSIONS?...
http://video.google.com/videoplay?do...10169657809939

Bruce Markowitz wrote:

Isn't it amazing how you can have an event like 911 on tape and people can
view the tape and deny the evidence of their own eyes?
We all SAW the planes hit the towers.
We all SAW the towers fall from the TOP down.
Many of us saw all this in person, not on tape.
The only conclusion I can draw is that some people are just idiots.


agreed!

btw, in the video, they highlight a "plume" of material ejecting from a
lower floor window below the start of the collapse and claim it was from an
explosion.

well, there was an explosion of sorts. its called compression. The air had
to exit somewhere, hence that debris plume. no dynamite needed!

Ever watch those documentaries on building implosions? Notice how they
spend weeks removing fixtures, walls, etc.? And then drilling holes in
supports and walls to hold the explosives? There's a lot of work
leading up to the big event. Wouldn't someone have noticed all that
going on in the weeks before 9/11? I know there has been a lot of
discussion about not "connecting the dots" but surely someone would
have noticed that. And what about hauling in all the tons of dynamite?
Wouldn't someone have noticed that and said something? "Hey, did
someone see a big cockroach upstairs or something?"

RK Henry

On Fri, 8 Sep 2006 19:03:12 -0400, "L." wrote:

That story line of it "not" being the planes that brought the towers down,
is one of the BIGGEST bull **** stories ever to be printed.

IF you "watched" the towers fall, they fell from top to bottom. Straight
down (just about). IF there were "Dynamite" used - especially at the ground
floors, they would have went out first - and THAT WAS NOT THE CASE. ALSO -
you would most likely have seen implosions or adversely - walls "shattering"
"OUT" depending on how the charges were placed. That ALSO was not the case.
IF you recall, the FIRST attempt to bring the towers down WAS done with
"Explosives" placed in the garage area. Yes, it caused damage and some
injuries/deaths but as to bringing the towers down - It didn't work.

You bull **** conspiracy theorists really need to get a grip on life. THAT
was a ****ing attack on our country - pure and simple. OR "maybe" YOU were a
part of it! Trying to spin it out of the real truth!

L.


"Robert M. Gary" wrote in message
roups.com...
I thought it was strange that this guy was a physics professor. What
would a physics prof know about how the towers fell? That's the realm
of engineering. A physics prof would start the problem with "ok, assume
a zero gravity, zero atmophere environment..."

-Robert,




MnMikew wrote:
This is what happens to tinfoilers who spew this crap.

http://www.ksl.com/?nid=148&sid=476951

"Physics Professor Steven Jones has made numerous statements about the
collapse of the World Trade Center. BYU has repeatedly said that it does
not
endorse assertions made by individual faculty.

"We are, however, concerned about the increasingly speculative and
accusatory nature of these statements by Dr. Jones."