The 9/11 terrorist attack on America which left almost 3,000 people
dead was an "inside job", according to a group of leading academics.

Around 75 top professors and leading scientists believe the attacks
were puppeteered by war mongers in the White House to justify the
invasion and the occupation of oil-rich Arab countries.

The claims have caused outrage and anger in the US which marks the
fifth anniversary of the terrorist attacks on Monday.

But leading scientists say the facts of their investigations cannot be
ignored and say they have evidence that points to one of the biggest
conspiracies ever perpetrated. Professor Steven Jones, who lectures in
physics at the Brigham Young University in Utah, says the official
version of events is the biggest and most evil cover up in history.

He has joined the 9/11 Scholars for Truth whose membership includes up
to 75 leading scientists and experts from universities across the US.

Prof Jones said: "We don't believe that 19 hijackers and a few others
in a cave in Afghanistan pulled this off acting alone.

"We challenge this official conspiracy theory and, by God, we're going
to get to the bottom of this."

They believe a group of US neo-conservatives called the Project for a
New American Century, set on US world dominance, orchestrated the 9/11
attacks as an excuse to hit Iraq, Afghanistan and later Iran.


http://www.dailymail.co.uk/pages/liv...n_page_id=1770

The Demolition of the World Trade Centre Complex:
http://video.google.com/videoplay?do...13046180631815

Gravity makes everything fall at the same rate. Fire
softens steel.

Little green men or maybe they're women, did it is just as
good a fantasy.


wrote in message
oups.com...
| The 9/11 terrorist attack on America which left almost
3,000 people
| dead was an "inside job", according to a group of leading
academics.
|
| Around 75 top professors and leading scientists believe
the attacks
| were puppeteered by war mongers in the White House to
justify the
| invasion and the occupation of oil-rich Arab countries.
|
| The claims have caused outrage and anger in the US which
marks the
| fifth anniversary of the terrorist attacks on Monday.
|
| But leading scientists say the facts of their
investigations cannot be
| ignored and say they have evidence that points to one of
the biggest
| conspiracies ever perpetrated. Professor Steven Jones, who
lectures in
| physics at the Brigham Young University in Utah, says the
official
| version of events is the biggest and most evil cover up in
history.
|
| He has joined the 9/11 Scholars for Truth whose membership
includes up
| to 75 leading scientists and experts from universities
across the US.
|
| Prof Jones said: "We don't believe that 19 hijackers and a
few others
| in a cave in Afghanistan pulled this off acting alone.
|
| "We challenge this official conspiracy theory and, by God,
we're going
| to get to the bottom of this."
|
| They believe a group of US neo-conservatives called the
Project for a
| New American Century, set on US world dominance,
orchestrated the 9/11
| attacks as an excuse to hit Iraq, Afghanistan and later
Iran.
|
|
|
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/pages/liv...n_page_id=1770
|
| The Demolition of the World Trade Centre Complex:
|
http://video.google.com/videoplay?do...13046180631815
|

You've seen the photos of the survivors standing in the impact holes on
the side of the tower begging for help. How could they do that if the
temperatures were hot enough to 'melt steel'?

wrote:
You've seen the photos of the survivors standing in the impact holes on
the side of the tower begging for help. How could they do that if the
temperatures were hot enough to 'melt steel'?

I never saw that particular picture -- where is it?

http://www.newsfocus.org/wtc_woman.gif

wrote:
You've seen the photos of the survivors standing in the impact holes on
the side of the tower begging for help. How could they do that if the
temperatures were hot enough to 'melt steel'?

The entire structure does not have to melt - just enough key
components.

For a physics professor he sure seems to ignore a lot of concepts such
as momentum, torque, leverage and conservation of energy...


HankC

HankC wrote:
wrote:

You've seen the photos of the survivors standing in the impact holes on
the side of the tower begging for help. How could they do that if the
temperatures were hot enough to 'melt steel'?


The entire structure does not have to melt - just enough key
components.

Nothing had to melt, just get hot enough to lose strength and yield.
With steel, this occurs well below the melting point. Hasn't anyone
ever watched a blacksmith at work?


For a physics professor he sure seems to ignore a lot of concepts such
as momentum, torque, leverage and conservation of energy...

And ignores common sense as well.

Matt

The following letter was sent today by Kevin Ryan of Underwriters
Laboratories to Frank Gayle of the National Institute of Standards and
Technology (NIST) . Underwriters Laboratories is the company that
certified the steel components used in the construction of the World
Trade Center towers. The information in this letter is of great
importance.

Dr. Gayle,

Having recently reviewed your team's report of 10/19/04, I felt the
need to contact you directly.

As I'm sure you know, the company I work for certified the steel
components used in the construction of the WTC buildings. [..]

We know that the steel components were certified to ASTM E119. The time
temperature curves for this standard require the samples to be exposed
to temperatures around 2000F for several hours. And as we all agree,
the steel applied met those specifications. Additionally, I think we
can all agree that even un-fireproofed steel will not melt until
reaching red-hot temperatures of nearly 3000F (2). Why Dr. Brown would
imply that 2000F would melt the high-grade steel used in those
buildings makes no sense at all. [..]

This story just does not add up. If steel from those buildings did
soften or melt, I'm sure we can all agree that this was certainly not
due to jet fuel fires of any kind, let alone the briefly burning fires
in those towers. That fact should be of great concern to all Americans.

http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.p...rt icleId=236

On 8 Sep 2006 06:28:09 -0700, wrote in
. com:

Newsgroups: alt.firefighters,alt.law-enforcement.traffic,rec.radio.scanner,rec.aviation .piloting,misc.emerg-services


Please remove rec.aviation.piloting from your replies to this spam.

In Larry Dighera writes:

On 8 Sep 2006 06:28:09 -0700, wrote in
.com:

Newsgroups: alt.firefighters,alt.law-enforcement.traffic,rec.radio.scanner,rec.aviation .piloting,misc.emerg-services

Please remove rec.aviation.piloting from your replies to this spam.

I realize I'm adding a post to this thread, but...

In general, don't bother replying to the creatures who
post this sort of drivel. They're living in their own
little spheres of stupidity and either don't read
any follows-up or don't care.

--
__________________________________________________ ___
Knowledge may be power, but communications is the key

[to foil spammers, my address has been double rot-13 encoded]