Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
thanks guys for the info.
I have another question if I put the antenna half way up the tower will I have decreased signal coming into the antenna through the triangular tower. would this not let the antenna be truly Omni? my tower is about 75 feet tall and I do not have access to the top of the tower? "Jeff" wrote in message news:AKQZg.245250$1i1.51592@attbi_s72... "TongSlinger" wrote in message ... I want to put 2 scanners on a diamond d discone antenna. is this possible without to much loss? thanks ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Forgot to add an important point. If you have a coax run of more than 10-20 feet please dont use RG 58. You will get more loss from it than the splitter especially at the higher freqs. If you dont want to/cant run the bigger heavier coax i.e. RG 213 go with RG 6. Its a 75 ohm cable instead of 50 but has very good loss rates and the difference in impedance's will be negligible and its the same basic diameter of RG 58. J |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mon, 23 Oct 2006 01:20:04 -0500, "TongSlinger"
wrote: I have another question if I put the antenna half way up the tower will I have decreased signal coming into the antenna through the triangular tower. would this not let the antenna be truly Omni? my tower is about 75 feet tall and I do not have access to the top of the tower? Depending on the distance between the tower and the antenna, and the frequency, you'll have a directional antenna pointing somewhere - either away from the tower, side-to-side relative to a line between the antenna and tower or somewhere between the two. You'd have to mount the antenna at least 3 or 4 wavelengths at the lowest frequency you're interested in (which would be around 25 feet at 150 MHZ, further for aircraft or VHF-lo) - 6 to 10 wavelengths is better - to get back a somewhat circular pattern. Since you'll be using the antenna at widely different frequencies there's no one solution unless the transmitters you want to monitor just happen to all be exactly where the antenna pattern points for that frequency. If you're that lucky, buy all the lottery tickets you can find - they'll all be winners. |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
thanks for all the good info on a subject I'm just starting to learn
"Al Klein" wrote in message ... On Mon, 23 Oct 2006 01:20:04 -0500, "TongSlinger" wrote: I have another question if I put the antenna half way up the tower will I have decreased signal coming into the antenna through the triangular tower. would this not let the antenna be truly Omni? my tower is about 75 feet tall and I do not have access to the top of the tower? Depending on the distance between the tower and the antenna, and the frequency, you'll have a directional antenna pointing somewhere - either away from the tower, side-to-side relative to a line between the antenna and tower or somewhere between the two. You'd have to mount the antenna at least 3 or 4 wavelengths at the lowest frequency you're interested in (which would be around 25 feet at 150 MHZ, further for aircraft or VHF-lo) - 6 to 10 wavelengths is better - to get back a somewhat circular pattern. Since you'll be using the antenna at widely different frequencies there's no one solution unless the transmitters you want to monitor just happen to all be exactly where the antenna pattern points for that frequency. If you're that lucky, buy all the lottery tickets you can find - they'll all be winners. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|