Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Bob,
Its always nice to have as many channels as possible. However I have both, actually 7 BC 780's and 2 BC 785's. As far as the 785 does I really don't like the radio at all. It suffers from FM overload which reduces the real world sensitivity and it also suffers from intermod problems. Two things I have yet to have a problem with on the 780's. I would only suggest a 785 is if you NEED digital. The 785 does digital just fine. The main reason I didn't sell my 785's is because I use them to monitor the NASA Kennedy Space Center 400 MHz Digital Trunk system. It does fine for this. However when it comes to trying to pickout distant stations in the MilAir range (which is what 99% of my listening is) the 785 sucks when compared to the 780. You can see pictures of my 780's and 785's he http://www.MilAirComms.com/shack.html George http://www.MilAirComms.com |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
WTB: VHF reference card for ITT-Mackay 3020/3020A ( a.k.a. DEBEG 7200, ITT-Mackay EB-3026, EB-3028) | Equipment | |||
POGO Recorder-MMC card | Broadcasting | |||
Rare Books on Electronics and Radio and Commmunications | Equipment | |||
Rare Books on Electronics and Radio and Commmunications | Equipment | |||
Taking Back the Group - Scanner Listener Helps Bust the Bad Guy | Scanner |