Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Other than one being a handheld and the other for mobile or desk use, are
there any differences in performance? |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() Bill wrote: Other than one being a handheld and the other for mobile or desk use, are there any differences in performance? Major difference. The 785 suffers from FM overload and Intermod problems. So much so that it lowers the sensitivity to nearly the point of uselessness in the 225-400 MHz range. The 250 does not have any of these problems and appears to be a very well built (from an electrical/RF standpoint) radio. I have many many radios in the shack (19 scanners plus HF rigs) and the 785 is the biggest dissapointment I've seen. The 785 however will receive digital systems well, but when it comes to Milair or Civil air bands forget it.... George http://www.MilAirComms.com/shack.html - Pictures of my Shack. http://www.MilAirComms.com |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|