LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #8   Report Post  
Old October 11th 03, 12:56 PM
GeorgeF
 
Posts: n/a
Default



frank smith wrote:
For me the bc9000xlt is better radio. Since im a big fan of alpha-tag (and
he give 16 chars to display a frequency), general coverage and ctcss the
bc9000xlt is a most usefull radio for me. It's not a yupiteru or a aor but
he is pretty nice, good sound and fast as hell.

I got 2045 ans 2006 and i will chose the bc9000xlt before them both. I will
have to try a bc780 one day ...


I have 2 PRO-2045's and really like that radio, good audio as well.

I had 1 BC9000XLT. Didn't like it because it received so many Cell phone
images in the 225-400 MHz range it made MilAir receiving worthless. My
closest Cell Phone tower at the time was over 5 miles away!

If you want to monitor MilAir then say away from the 9000XLT, that was
the only complaint however I had regarding that radio.

But recently I've pickup up used (but in great condition) PRO-2045's for
$100, that's an excellent scanner for $100. Great MilAir preformance.

George
http://www.MilAirComms.com

 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Which Bearcat: bc895xlt, bc9000xlt, or bc 780xlt? steelguitar Scanner 2 October 6th 03 02:27 AM
FS BC9000XLT Al Buterol Scanner 0 August 13th 03 05:23 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 10:53 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Radio"

 

Copyright © 2017