Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#8
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() frank smith wrote: For me the bc9000xlt is better radio. Since im a big fan of alpha-tag (and he give 16 chars to display a frequency), general coverage and ctcss the bc9000xlt is a most usefull radio for me. It's not a yupiteru or a aor but he is pretty nice, good sound and fast as hell. I got 2045 ans 2006 and i will chose the bc9000xlt before them both. I will have to try a bc780 one day ... I have 2 PRO-2045's and really like that radio, good audio as well. I had 1 BC9000XLT. Didn't like it because it received so many Cell phone images in the 225-400 MHz range it made MilAir receiving worthless. My closest Cell Phone tower at the time was over 5 miles away! If you want to monitor MilAir then say away from the 9000XLT, that was the only complaint however I had regarding that radio. But recently I've pickup up used (but in great condition) PRO-2045's for $100, that's an excellent scanner for $100. Great MilAir preformance. George http://www.MilAirComms.com |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Which Bearcat: bc895xlt, bc9000xlt, or bc 780xlt? | Scanner | |||
FS BC9000XLT | Scanner |