| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
What are the reviews for the '96 anyway, I haven't seen any yet. Is it
worth getting? What are the Pros-Cons of this scanner? Is this the best Scanner of it's type? For it's price, it better damn well recieve just about EVERYTHING. |
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
I really enjoy mine...
Good audio & great reception... There are a few things it could use, but they are minor... ** Don't shake my tree if you don't like what comes down** **Life is too short... Enjoy the ride...** {{:-}) ({-:}} |
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
On Tue, 25 Nov 2003 09:04:46 GMT, Steve Silverwood
wrote: There's one review in the December 2003 issue of Monitoring Times. And unfortunately, it omits the one band that I really need in a scanner: the UHF military aircraft band at 225-400 MHz...! I mean, what is the PROBLEM here? How hard is it to include that in a scanner? Especially a hand-held version, which is what one would naturally want to take along to an AIR SHOW? The 225-400 MHz band can be opened up on the PRO-96. It has excellent sensitivity on those frequencies. I have owned the PRO-96 for two months now and I would put it into the same category as the Radio Shack PRO-2006 and PRO-43. Excellent scanners that will become "classics" to scanner buffs. The Win96 computer control program allows you to open up all of these frequencies. If you go to the Win96 website, you can see the results of sensitivity tests at all of these frequencies. The address is: http://www.starrsoft.com/software/win96/FreqTest.asp |
| Reply |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| Amateur Radio Newsline™ Report 1415  September 24, 2004 | Dx | |||
| Amateur Radio Newsline™ Report 1402  June 25, 2004 | Dx | |||
| Amateur Radio Newsline™ Report 1379 – January 16, 2004 | Policy | |||
| Amateur Radio Newsline™ Report 1379 – January 16, 2004 | General | |||
| Amateur Radio Newsline™ Report 1379 – January 16, 2004 | Dx | |||